Towards the Non-Mertonian Ethos of a Non-Mertonian Science: Situating the Research Value of Openness
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Novation |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/95879 |
Resumo: | It is hard to disagree with the thrust of René von Schomberg’s position paper. It is driven by the worry that current conceptions of “open science” are all too impoverished – that they need to be complemented by the social practice of “mutual responsiveness”. In terms of political theory or notions of democracy, on the one hand, in terms of socially relevant research practice, on the other hand, only an ambitious commitment to open science will be robust enough to make a difference and contribute to the solution of pressing problems. In contrast, it is paying lip service only to the ideal of openness when “open science” becomes reduced to “open access publishing” or data storage rituals. As von Schomberg shows, this might actually deepen disparities and redundancies within dysfunctional science. |
id |
UFPR-18_fc967faa718c69fc3f19bdfb3e122b64 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/95879 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-18 |
network_name_str |
Novation |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Towards the Non-Mertonian Ethos of a Non-Mertonian Science: Situating the Research Value of Opennessopen science; Robert K. Merton; Covid 19, research values; scientific integrity; research assessmentIt is hard to disagree with the thrust of René von Schomberg’s position paper. It is driven by the worry that current conceptions of “open science” are all too impoverished – that they need to be complemented by the social practice of “mutual responsiveness”. In terms of political theory or notions of democracy, on the one hand, in terms of socially relevant research practice, on the other hand, only an ambitious commitment to open science will be robust enough to make a difference and contribute to the solution of pressing problems. In contrast, it is paying lip service only to the ideal of openness when “open science” becomes reduced to “open access publishing” or data storage rituals. As von Schomberg shows, this might actually deepen disparities and redundancies within dysfunctional science.Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba (Brazil)Nordmann, Alfred2024-06-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo de convidadoGuest Authorapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/9587910.5380/nocsi.v0i6.95879NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 6 (2024): Towards a New Ethos of Science or a Reform of the Institution of Science?; 77-85NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 6 (2024): Towards a New Ethos of Science or a Reform of the Institution of Science?; 77-852562-714710.5380/nocsi.v0i6reponame:Novationinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRenghttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/95879/52197Copyright (c) 2024 Alfred Nordmannhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-07-01T11:52:24Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/95879Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/indexPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/oainovation@ufpr.br2562-71472562-7147opendoar:2024-07-01T12:57:13.571382Novation - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Towards the Non-Mertonian Ethos of a Non-Mertonian Science: Situating the Research Value of Openness |
title |
Towards the Non-Mertonian Ethos of a Non-Mertonian Science: Situating the Research Value of Openness |
spellingShingle |
Towards the Non-Mertonian Ethos of a Non-Mertonian Science: Situating the Research Value of Openness Nordmann, Alfred open science; Robert K. Merton; Covid 19, research values; scientific integrity; research assessment |
title_short |
Towards the Non-Mertonian Ethos of a Non-Mertonian Science: Situating the Research Value of Openness |
title_full |
Towards the Non-Mertonian Ethos of a Non-Mertonian Science: Situating the Research Value of Openness |
title_fullStr |
Towards the Non-Mertonian Ethos of a Non-Mertonian Science: Situating the Research Value of Openness |
title_full_unstemmed |
Towards the Non-Mertonian Ethos of a Non-Mertonian Science: Situating the Research Value of Openness |
title_sort |
Towards the Non-Mertonian Ethos of a Non-Mertonian Science: Situating the Research Value of Openness |
author |
Nordmann, Alfred |
author_facet |
Nordmann, Alfred |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nordmann, Alfred |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
open science; Robert K. Merton; Covid 19, research values; scientific integrity; research assessment |
topic |
open science; Robert K. Merton; Covid 19, research values; scientific integrity; research assessment |
description |
It is hard to disagree with the thrust of René von Schomberg’s position paper. It is driven by the worry that current conceptions of “open science” are all too impoverished – that they need to be complemented by the social practice of “mutual responsiveness”. In terms of political theory or notions of democracy, on the one hand, in terms of socially relevant research practice, on the other hand, only an ambitious commitment to open science will be robust enough to make a difference and contribute to the solution of pressing problems. In contrast, it is paying lip service only to the ideal of openness when “open science” becomes reduced to “open access publishing” or data storage rituals. As von Schomberg shows, this might actually deepen disparities and redundancies within dysfunctional science. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-06-25 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo de convidado Guest Author |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/95879 10.5380/nocsi.v0i6.95879 |
url |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/95879 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5380/nocsi.v0i6.95879 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/novation/article/view/95879/52197 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Alfred Nordmann http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Alfred Nordmann http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba (Brazil) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba (Brazil) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 6 (2024): Towards a New Ethos of Science or a Reform of the Institution of Science?; 77-85 NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation; No 6 (2024): Towards a New Ethos of Science or a Reform of the Institution of Science?; 77-85 2562-7147 10.5380/nocsi.v0i6 reponame:Novation instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Novation |
collection |
Novation |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Novation - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
novation@ufpr.br |
_version_ |
1808579137643741184 |