A MODEL SUGGESTION FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE TRAFFIC ACCIDENT HOTSPOTS ON THE TURKISH HIGHWAY ROAD NETWORK: A PILOT STUDY

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Erdogan, Saffet
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Ilçi, Veli, Saysal, Omer, Korkmaz, Aysegul
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/40463
Resumo: Traffic accidents are very serious problems for human life and the environment. In road safety, it is crucial to identify the high risk locations to apply proper counter measures. This paper aims at introducing outcomes of a pilot project whose main goal is to develop a GIS based crash analysis system integrated with the quantitative methods for identification of high risk locations on road networks in Turkey. In this concept, traditional hotspot detection methods used in Turkey(crash frequency, rate, and severity) are compared with the spatial statistical methods including Moran‟s I, GetisOrd G and planar and network kernel density estimation in terms of their sensitivity to spatial characteristics of crash clusters. Many countries use traditional hotspot detection approaches such as crash frequency, crash rate, and crash severity as well as Turkey. In this project, we aimed at obtaining a model including different hotspot identification methods for the safety program of Turkey. In order to obtain the model, many hotspot detection methods will be used and compare stage by stage. In the first stage, the seven methods mentioned above are used and examined. Although some of these methods are compared in couple, there is no study using all these methods together extensively in the literature. Methods validated with a different spatial vantage points. Repetitiveness of hotspots in a seven years period are used to compare the methods. Meanwhile advantages and disadvantages of the methods according to location of hotspots are examined additionally. Results show that using planar KDE with Gi in the junction locations and using planar KDE with Moran‟s I in the straight road locations could improve the model while determining hotspots
id UFPR-2_123b85a1bec2f7cc818cdede3a1f32ba
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/40463
network_acronym_str UFPR-2
network_name_str Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
repository_id_str
spelling A MODEL SUGGESTION FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE TRAFFIC ACCIDENT HOTSPOTS ON THE TURKISH HIGHWAY ROAD NETWORK: A PILOT STUDYA MODEL SUGGESTION FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE TRAFFIC ACCIDENT HOTSPOTS ON THE TURKISH HIGHWAY ROAD NETWORK: A PILOT STUDYGeociências; GeodésiaTraffic Accidents; Hotspot; Spatial Statistical Methods; GIS.Geociências; GeodésiaTraffic Accidents; Hotspot; Spatial Statistical Methods; GIS.Traffic accidents are very serious problems for human life and the environment. In road safety, it is crucial to identify the high risk locations to apply proper counter measures. This paper aims at introducing outcomes of a pilot project whose main goal is to develop a GIS based crash analysis system integrated with the quantitative methods for identification of high risk locations on road networks in Turkey. In this concept, traditional hotspot detection methods used in Turkey(crash frequency, rate, and severity) are compared with the spatial statistical methods including Moran‟s I, GetisOrd G and planar and network kernel density estimation in terms of their sensitivity to spatial characteristics of crash clusters. Many countries use traditional hotspot detection approaches such as crash frequency, crash rate, and crash severity as well as Turkey. In this project, we aimed at obtaining a model including different hotspot identification methods for the safety program of Turkey. In order to obtain the model, many hotspot detection methods will be used and compare stage by stage. In the first stage, the seven methods mentioned above are used and examined. Although some of these methods are compared in couple, there is no study using all these methods together extensively in the literature. Methods validated with a different spatial vantage points. Repetitiveness of hotspots in a seven years period are used to compare the methods. Meanwhile advantages and disadvantages of the methods according to location of hotspots are examined additionally. Results show that using planar KDE with Gi in the junction locations and using planar KDE with Moran‟s I in the straight road locations could improve the model while determining hotspotsTraffic accidents are very serious problems for human life and the environment. In road safety, it is crucial to identify the high risk locations to apply proper counter measures. This paper aims at introducing outcomes of a pilot project whose main goal is to develop a GIS based crash analysis system integrated with the quantitative methods for identification of high risk locations on road networks in Turkey. In this concept, traditional hotspot detection methods used in Turkey(crash frequency, rate, and severity) are compared with the spatial statistical methods including Moran‟s I, GetisOrd G and planar and network kernel density estimation in terms of their sensitivity to spatial characteristics of crash clusters. Many countries use traditional hotspot detection approaches such as crash frequency, crash rate, and crash severity as well as Turkey. In this project, we aimed at obtaining a model including different hotspot identification methods for the safety program of Turkey. In order to obtain the model, many hotspot detection methods will be used and compare stage by stage. In the first stage, the seven methods mentioned above are used and examined. Although some of these methods are compared in couple, there is no study using all these methods together extensively in the literature. Methods validated with a different spatial vantage points. Repetitiveness of hotspots in a seven years period are used to compare the methods. Meanwhile advantages and disadvantages of the methods according to location of hotspots are examined additionally. Results show that using planar KDE with Gi in the junction locations and using planar KDE with Moran‟s I in the straight road locations could improve the model while determining hotspots.Boletim de Ciências GeodésicasBulletin of Geodetic SciencesErdogan, SaffetIlçi, VeliSaysal, OmerKorkmaz, Aysegul2015-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/40463Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas; Vol 21, No 1 (2015)Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences; Vol 21, No 1 (2015)1982-21701413-4853reponame:Boletim de Ciências Geodésicasinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/40463/24695info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-05-26T14:02:15Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/40463Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcgPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/oaiqdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br||qdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br1982-21701413-4853opendoar:2015-05-26T14:02:15Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A MODEL SUGGESTION FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE TRAFFIC ACCIDENT HOTSPOTS ON THE TURKISH HIGHWAY ROAD NETWORK: A PILOT STUDY
A MODEL SUGGESTION FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE TRAFFIC ACCIDENT HOTSPOTS ON THE TURKISH HIGHWAY ROAD NETWORK: A PILOT STUDY
title A MODEL SUGGESTION FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE TRAFFIC ACCIDENT HOTSPOTS ON THE TURKISH HIGHWAY ROAD NETWORK: A PILOT STUDY
spellingShingle A MODEL SUGGESTION FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE TRAFFIC ACCIDENT HOTSPOTS ON THE TURKISH HIGHWAY ROAD NETWORK: A PILOT STUDY
Erdogan, Saffet
Geociências; Geodésia
Traffic Accidents; Hotspot; Spatial Statistical Methods; GIS.
Geociências; Geodésia
Traffic Accidents; Hotspot; Spatial Statistical Methods; GIS.
title_short A MODEL SUGGESTION FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE TRAFFIC ACCIDENT HOTSPOTS ON THE TURKISH HIGHWAY ROAD NETWORK: A PILOT STUDY
title_full A MODEL SUGGESTION FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE TRAFFIC ACCIDENT HOTSPOTS ON THE TURKISH HIGHWAY ROAD NETWORK: A PILOT STUDY
title_fullStr A MODEL SUGGESTION FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE TRAFFIC ACCIDENT HOTSPOTS ON THE TURKISH HIGHWAY ROAD NETWORK: A PILOT STUDY
title_full_unstemmed A MODEL SUGGESTION FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE TRAFFIC ACCIDENT HOTSPOTS ON THE TURKISH HIGHWAY ROAD NETWORK: A PILOT STUDY
title_sort A MODEL SUGGESTION FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE TRAFFIC ACCIDENT HOTSPOTS ON THE TURKISH HIGHWAY ROAD NETWORK: A PILOT STUDY
author Erdogan, Saffet
author_facet Erdogan, Saffet
Ilçi, Veli
Saysal, Omer
Korkmaz, Aysegul
author_role author
author2 Ilçi, Veli
Saysal, Omer
Korkmaz, Aysegul
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Erdogan, Saffet
Ilçi, Veli
Saysal, Omer
Korkmaz, Aysegul
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Geociências; Geodésia
Traffic Accidents; Hotspot; Spatial Statistical Methods; GIS.
Geociências; Geodésia
Traffic Accidents; Hotspot; Spatial Statistical Methods; GIS.
topic Geociências; Geodésia
Traffic Accidents; Hotspot; Spatial Statistical Methods; GIS.
Geociências; Geodésia
Traffic Accidents; Hotspot; Spatial Statistical Methods; GIS.
description Traffic accidents are very serious problems for human life and the environment. In road safety, it is crucial to identify the high risk locations to apply proper counter measures. This paper aims at introducing outcomes of a pilot project whose main goal is to develop a GIS based crash analysis system integrated with the quantitative methods for identification of high risk locations on road networks in Turkey. In this concept, traditional hotspot detection methods used in Turkey(crash frequency, rate, and severity) are compared with the spatial statistical methods including Moran‟s I, GetisOrd G and planar and network kernel density estimation in terms of their sensitivity to spatial characteristics of crash clusters. Many countries use traditional hotspot detection approaches such as crash frequency, crash rate, and crash severity as well as Turkey. In this project, we aimed at obtaining a model including different hotspot identification methods for the safety program of Turkey. In order to obtain the model, many hotspot detection methods will be used and compare stage by stage. In the first stage, the seven methods mentioned above are used and examined. Although some of these methods are compared in couple, there is no study using all these methods together extensively in the literature. Methods validated with a different spatial vantage points. Repetitiveness of hotspots in a seven years period are used to compare the methods. Meanwhile advantages and disadvantages of the methods according to location of hotspots are examined additionally. Results show that using planar KDE with Gi in the junction locations and using planar KDE with Moran‟s I in the straight road locations could improve the model while determining hotspots
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-03-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/40463
url https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/40463
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/40463/24695
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas; Vol 21, No 1 (2015)
Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences; Vol 21, No 1 (2015)
1982-2170
1413-4853
reponame:Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
collection Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv qdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br||qdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br
_version_ 1799771718234931200