State of art of bathymetric surveys
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/85450 |
Resumo: | Technological advances in bathymetric equipment, positioning capacity, data processing, as well as the development of new ways of obtaining depth and other ways of exploring the submerged bottom, have been noticed in recent years. It is known that acoustic remote sensing is the most widely used technique for depth measurement. Survey systems can be embedded on various platforms and also provide different accuracies. Coupled to these systems are also Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), auxiliary sensors and speed profilers, improving the accuracy of the data obtained. Alternatively to the use of echo sounders, optical sensing (active and passive sensors) or satellite radar altimetry can be used to estimate depth. Thus, this study aims to present an overview of bathymetric survey methodologies, as well as the evolution of the use of sounding platforms, systems and sensors and various existing technologies. In addition, the main uncertainties involved and the advantages and disadvantages of the available solutions are also evidenced, providing the reader the ability to choose the most appropriate technique. |
id |
UFPR-2_5bac640f8737923037443cd40fd2bb21 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/85450 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-2 |
network_name_str |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
State of art of bathymetric surveysBathymetric survey; Hydrographic; Methods; Platforms; Seafloor mapping.Technological advances in bathymetric equipment, positioning capacity, data processing, as well as the development of new ways of obtaining depth and other ways of exploring the submerged bottom, have been noticed in recent years. It is known that acoustic remote sensing is the most widely used technique for depth measurement. Survey systems can be embedded on various platforms and also provide different accuracies. Coupled to these systems are also Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), auxiliary sensors and speed profilers, improving the accuracy of the data obtained. Alternatively to the use of echo sounders, optical sensing (active and passive sensors) or satellite radar altimetry can be used to estimate depth. Thus, this study aims to present an overview of bathymetric survey methodologies, as well as the evolution of the use of sounding platforms, systems and sensors and various existing technologies. In addition, the main uncertainties involved and the advantages and disadvantages of the available solutions are also evidenced, providing the reader the ability to choose the most appropriate technique.Boletim de Ciências GeodésicasBulletin of Geodetic SciencesFerreira, Italo Oliveirade Andrade, Laura CoelhoTeixeira, Victoria GibrimSantos, Felipe Catão Mesquita2022-05-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/85450Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas; Vol 28, No 1 (2022)Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences; Vol 28, No 1 (2022)1982-21701413-4853reponame:Boletim de Ciências Geodésicasinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRenghttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/85450/46220Copyright (c) 2022 Italo Oliveira Ferreira, Laura Coelho de Andrade, Victoria Gibrim Teixeira, Felipe Catão Mesquita Santoshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-05-28T04:07:24Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/85450Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcgPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/oaiqdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br||qdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br1982-21701413-4853opendoar:2022-05-28T04:07:24Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
State of art of bathymetric surveys |
title |
State of art of bathymetric surveys |
spellingShingle |
State of art of bathymetric surveys Ferreira, Italo Oliveira Bathymetric survey; Hydrographic; Methods; Platforms; Seafloor mapping. |
title_short |
State of art of bathymetric surveys |
title_full |
State of art of bathymetric surveys |
title_fullStr |
State of art of bathymetric surveys |
title_full_unstemmed |
State of art of bathymetric surveys |
title_sort |
State of art of bathymetric surveys |
author |
Ferreira, Italo Oliveira |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Italo Oliveira de Andrade, Laura Coelho Teixeira, Victoria Gibrim Santos, Felipe Catão Mesquita |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Andrade, Laura Coelho Teixeira, Victoria Gibrim Santos, Felipe Catão Mesquita |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Italo Oliveira de Andrade, Laura Coelho Teixeira, Victoria Gibrim Santos, Felipe Catão Mesquita |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bathymetric survey; Hydrographic; Methods; Platforms; Seafloor mapping. |
topic |
Bathymetric survey; Hydrographic; Methods; Platforms; Seafloor mapping. |
description |
Technological advances in bathymetric equipment, positioning capacity, data processing, as well as the development of new ways of obtaining depth and other ways of exploring the submerged bottom, have been noticed in recent years. It is known that acoustic remote sensing is the most widely used technique for depth measurement. Survey systems can be embedded on various platforms and also provide different accuracies. Coupled to these systems are also Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), auxiliary sensors and speed profilers, improving the accuracy of the data obtained. Alternatively to the use of echo sounders, optical sensing (active and passive sensors) or satellite radar altimetry can be used to estimate depth. Thus, this study aims to present an overview of bathymetric survey methodologies, as well as the evolution of the use of sounding platforms, systems and sensors and various existing technologies. In addition, the main uncertainties involved and the advantages and disadvantages of the available solutions are also evidenced, providing the reader the ability to choose the most appropriate technique. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-28 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/85450 |
url |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/85450 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/85450/46220 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas; Vol 28, No 1 (2022) Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences; Vol 28, No 1 (2022) 1982-2170 1413-4853 reponame:Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas |
collection |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
qdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br||qdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br |
_version_ |
1799771720078327808 |