State of art of bathymetric surveys

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ferreira, Italo Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: de Andrade, Laura Coelho, Teixeira, Victoria Gibrim, Santos, Felipe Catão Mesquita
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/85450
Resumo: Technological advances in bathymetric equipment, positioning capacity, data processing, as well as the development of new ways of obtaining depth and other ways of exploring the submerged bottom, have been noticed in recent years. It is known that acoustic remote sensing is the most widely used technique for depth measurement. Survey systems can be embedded on various platforms and also provide different accuracies. Coupled to these systems are also Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), auxiliary sensors and speed profilers, improving the accuracy of the data obtained. Alternatively to the use of echo sounders, optical sensing (active and passive sensors) or satellite radar altimetry can be used to estimate depth. Thus, this study aims to present an overview of bathymetric survey methodologies, as well as the evolution of the use of sounding platforms, systems and sensors and various existing technologies. In addition, the main uncertainties involved and the advantages and disadvantages of the available solutions are also evidenced, providing the reader the ability to choose the most appropriate technique.
id UFPR-2_5bac640f8737923037443cd40fd2bb21
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/85450
network_acronym_str UFPR-2
network_name_str Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
repository_id_str
spelling State of art of bathymetric surveysBathymetric survey; Hydrographic; Methods; Platforms; Seafloor mapping.Technological advances in bathymetric equipment, positioning capacity, data processing, as well as the development of new ways of obtaining depth and other ways of exploring the submerged bottom, have been noticed in recent years. It is known that acoustic remote sensing is the most widely used technique for depth measurement. Survey systems can be embedded on various platforms and also provide different accuracies. Coupled to these systems are also Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), auxiliary sensors and speed profilers, improving the accuracy of the data obtained. Alternatively to the use of echo sounders, optical sensing (active and passive sensors) or satellite radar altimetry can be used to estimate depth. Thus, this study aims to present an overview of bathymetric survey methodologies, as well as the evolution of the use of sounding platforms, systems and sensors and various existing technologies. In addition, the main uncertainties involved and the advantages and disadvantages of the available solutions are also evidenced, providing the reader the ability to choose the most appropriate technique.Boletim de Ciências GeodésicasBulletin of Geodetic SciencesFerreira, Italo Oliveirade Andrade, Laura CoelhoTeixeira, Victoria GibrimSantos, Felipe Catão Mesquita2022-05-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/85450Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas; Vol 28, No 1 (2022)Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences; Vol 28, No 1 (2022)1982-21701413-4853reponame:Boletim de Ciências Geodésicasinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRenghttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/85450/46220Copyright (c) 2022 Italo Oliveira Ferreira, Laura Coelho de Andrade, Victoria Gibrim Teixeira, Felipe Catão Mesquita Santoshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-05-28T04:07:24Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/85450Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcgPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/oaiqdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br||qdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br1982-21701413-4853opendoar:2022-05-28T04:07:24Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv State of art of bathymetric surveys
title State of art of bathymetric surveys
spellingShingle State of art of bathymetric surveys
Ferreira, Italo Oliveira
Bathymetric survey; Hydrographic; Methods; Platforms; Seafloor mapping.
title_short State of art of bathymetric surveys
title_full State of art of bathymetric surveys
title_fullStr State of art of bathymetric surveys
title_full_unstemmed State of art of bathymetric surveys
title_sort State of art of bathymetric surveys
author Ferreira, Italo Oliveira
author_facet Ferreira, Italo Oliveira
de Andrade, Laura Coelho
Teixeira, Victoria Gibrim
Santos, Felipe Catão Mesquita
author_role author
author2 de Andrade, Laura Coelho
Teixeira, Victoria Gibrim
Santos, Felipe Catão Mesquita
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, Italo Oliveira
de Andrade, Laura Coelho
Teixeira, Victoria Gibrim
Santos, Felipe Catão Mesquita
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bathymetric survey; Hydrographic; Methods; Platforms; Seafloor mapping.
topic Bathymetric survey; Hydrographic; Methods; Platforms; Seafloor mapping.
description Technological advances in bathymetric equipment, positioning capacity, data processing, as well as the development of new ways of obtaining depth and other ways of exploring the submerged bottom, have been noticed in recent years. It is known that acoustic remote sensing is the most widely used technique for depth measurement. Survey systems can be embedded on various platforms and also provide different accuracies. Coupled to these systems are also Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), auxiliary sensors and speed profilers, improving the accuracy of the data obtained. Alternatively to the use of echo sounders, optical sensing (active and passive sensors) or satellite radar altimetry can be used to estimate depth. Thus, this study aims to present an overview of bathymetric survey methodologies, as well as the evolution of the use of sounding platforms, systems and sensors and various existing technologies. In addition, the main uncertainties involved and the advantages and disadvantages of the available solutions are also evidenced, providing the reader the ability to choose the most appropriate technique.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-28
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/85450
url https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/85450
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/bcg/article/view/85450/46220
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas; Vol 28, No 1 (2022)
Bulletin of Geodetic Sciences; Vol 28, No 1 (2022)
1982-2170
1413-4853
reponame:Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
collection Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv Boletim de Ciências Geodésicas - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv qdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br||qdalmolin@ufpr.br|| danielsantos@ufpr.br
_version_ 1799771720078327808