In search of alternative ways to resolve conflict according to a guarantee model of juvenile prosecution: restorative justice in a framework of adequacy of jurisdictional practices and discourses to the integral protection paradigm
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/85481 |
Resumo: | This article seeks to analyze to what extent there is an adequacy between the ratio decidendi expressed in part of Brazilian jurisprudence and the principled guidelines that characterize the doctrine of full protection of children and adolescents, a normative framework of the 1988 Constitution. More specifically, the degree of adherence of Brazilian jurisprudence to the recommendation of prioritizing alternative forms of conflict resolution in the area of juvenile justice is examined. This will be done through the qualitative analysis of decisions handed down by Brazilian higher and state courts that work on the subject, between the years 2012 and 2019, selected according to criteria of region and impact. The analytical comparison considers the indicators developed by the Ibero-American Center for Children’s Rights (Santiago, Chile), specifically developed for this purpose in the context of Ibero-America. The results indicate the permanence of practices of “minorism”, which respond to the legacies of the tutelary stage of juvenile criminal law which, in turn, is in force in the Brazilian legal space in the legislation of the doctrine of the irregular situation of the 19th century. The framework, added to other aspects highlighted in the conclusion, poses important obstacles to the implementation of restorative practices in the field of juvenile justice. |
id |
UFPR-3_3b62a91ea6ce3c9b1f369b36042e1bc6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/85481 |
network_acronym_str |
UFPR-3 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
In search of alternative ways to resolve conflict according to a guarantee model of juvenile prosecution: restorative justice in a framework of adequacy of jurisdictional practices and discourses to the integral protection paradigmEm busca de formas alternativas de resolução de conflito segundo um modelo garantista de responsabilização juvenil: justiça restaurativa em um quadro de adequação de práticas e discursos jurisdicionais ao paradigma da proteção integralJuvenile justice. Restorative justice. Doctrine of integral protection. Jurisprudence. Hermeneutics.Direito; Sociologia JurídicaJustiça juvenil. Justiça restaurativa. Doutrina da proteção integral. Jurisprudência. Hermenêutica.This article seeks to analyze to what extent there is an adequacy between the ratio decidendi expressed in part of Brazilian jurisprudence and the principled guidelines that characterize the doctrine of full protection of children and adolescents, a normative framework of the 1988 Constitution. More specifically, the degree of adherence of Brazilian jurisprudence to the recommendation of prioritizing alternative forms of conflict resolution in the area of juvenile justice is examined. This will be done through the qualitative analysis of decisions handed down by Brazilian higher and state courts that work on the subject, between the years 2012 and 2019, selected according to criteria of region and impact. The analytical comparison considers the indicators developed by the Ibero-American Center for Children’s Rights (Santiago, Chile), specifically developed for this purpose in the context of Ibero-America. The results indicate the permanence of practices of “minorism”, which respond to the legacies of the tutelary stage of juvenile criminal law which, in turn, is in force in the Brazilian legal space in the legislation of the doctrine of the irregular situation of the 19th century. The framework, added to other aspects highlighted in the conclusion, poses important obstacles to the implementation of restorative practices in the field of juvenile justice.Este artigo busca analisar em que medida existe adequação entre a ratio decidendi expressa em parte da jurisprudência brasileira e as diretrizes principiológicas que caracterizam a doutrina da proteção integral das crianças e adolescentes, marco normativo da Constituição de 1988. Examina-se, mais especificamente, o grau de adesão da jurisprudência brasileira à recomendação de priorização por formas alternativas de resolução de conflitos na seara da justiça juvenil. Isso será realizado por meio da análise qualitativa de decisões proferidas por tribunais superiores e tribunais de justiça estaduais brasileiros que atuam na temática, entre os anos de 2012 e 2019, selecionadas segundo critérios de região e impacto. O cotejo analítico considera os indicadores desenvolvidos pelo Centro Ibero-Americano de Direitos da Criança (Santiago, Chile), especificamente desenvolvidos para esta finalidade no contexto da Ibero-América. Os resultados indicam a permanência de práticas de cariz menorista, as quais respondem às heranças da etapa tutelar do direito penal juvenil que, por sua vez, encontra vigência no espaço jurídico brasileiro nas legislações da doutrina da situação irregular do século XIX. O quadro, somado a outros aspectos destacados na conclusão, oferece obstáculos importantes à implementação das práticas restaurativas no âmbito da justiça juvenil..Lamare, Bruno Jacoby deCosta, Ana Paula MottaCunha, Victória Hoff da2023-04-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/8548110.5380/rfdufpr.v68i1.85481Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR; v. 68, n. 1 (2023); 137-1702236-72840104-331510.5380/rfdufpr.v68i1reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/85481/49120https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/downloadSuppFile/85481/54597Direitos autorais 2023 Bruno Jacoby de Lamare, Ana Paula Motta Costa, Victória Hoff da Cunhainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-04-28T13:08:50Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/85481Revistahttp://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs2/index.php/direitoPUBhttp://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs/index.php/direito/oai||revistadireito@ufpr.br2236-72840104-3315opendoar:2023-04-28T13:08:50Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
In search of alternative ways to resolve conflict according to a guarantee model of juvenile prosecution: restorative justice in a framework of adequacy of jurisdictional practices and discourses to the integral protection paradigm Em busca de formas alternativas de resolução de conflito segundo um modelo garantista de responsabilização juvenil: justiça restaurativa em um quadro de adequação de práticas e discursos jurisdicionais ao paradigma da proteção integral |
title |
In search of alternative ways to resolve conflict according to a guarantee model of juvenile prosecution: restorative justice in a framework of adequacy of jurisdictional practices and discourses to the integral protection paradigm |
spellingShingle |
In search of alternative ways to resolve conflict according to a guarantee model of juvenile prosecution: restorative justice in a framework of adequacy of jurisdictional practices and discourses to the integral protection paradigm Lamare, Bruno Jacoby de Juvenile justice. Restorative justice. Doctrine of integral protection. Jurisprudence. Hermeneutics. Direito; Sociologia Jurídica Justiça juvenil. Justiça restaurativa. Doutrina da proteção integral. Jurisprudência. Hermenêutica. |
title_short |
In search of alternative ways to resolve conflict according to a guarantee model of juvenile prosecution: restorative justice in a framework of adequacy of jurisdictional practices and discourses to the integral protection paradigm |
title_full |
In search of alternative ways to resolve conflict according to a guarantee model of juvenile prosecution: restorative justice in a framework of adequacy of jurisdictional practices and discourses to the integral protection paradigm |
title_fullStr |
In search of alternative ways to resolve conflict according to a guarantee model of juvenile prosecution: restorative justice in a framework of adequacy of jurisdictional practices and discourses to the integral protection paradigm |
title_full_unstemmed |
In search of alternative ways to resolve conflict according to a guarantee model of juvenile prosecution: restorative justice in a framework of adequacy of jurisdictional practices and discourses to the integral protection paradigm |
title_sort |
In search of alternative ways to resolve conflict according to a guarantee model of juvenile prosecution: restorative justice in a framework of adequacy of jurisdictional practices and discourses to the integral protection paradigm |
author |
Lamare, Bruno Jacoby de |
author_facet |
Lamare, Bruno Jacoby de Costa, Ana Paula Motta Cunha, Victória Hoff da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Costa, Ana Paula Motta Cunha, Victória Hoff da |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lamare, Bruno Jacoby de Costa, Ana Paula Motta Cunha, Victória Hoff da |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Juvenile justice. Restorative justice. Doctrine of integral protection. Jurisprudence. Hermeneutics. Direito; Sociologia Jurídica Justiça juvenil. Justiça restaurativa. Doutrina da proteção integral. Jurisprudência. Hermenêutica. |
topic |
Juvenile justice. Restorative justice. Doctrine of integral protection. Jurisprudence. Hermeneutics. Direito; Sociologia Jurídica Justiça juvenil. Justiça restaurativa. Doutrina da proteção integral. Jurisprudência. Hermenêutica. |
description |
This article seeks to analyze to what extent there is an adequacy between the ratio decidendi expressed in part of Brazilian jurisprudence and the principled guidelines that characterize the doctrine of full protection of children and adolescents, a normative framework of the 1988 Constitution. More specifically, the degree of adherence of Brazilian jurisprudence to the recommendation of prioritizing alternative forms of conflict resolution in the area of juvenile justice is examined. This will be done through the qualitative analysis of decisions handed down by Brazilian higher and state courts that work on the subject, between the years 2012 and 2019, selected according to criteria of region and impact. The analytical comparison considers the indicators developed by the Ibero-American Center for Children’s Rights (Santiago, Chile), specifically developed for this purpose in the context of Ibero-America. The results indicate the permanence of practices of “minorism”, which respond to the legacies of the tutelary stage of juvenile criminal law which, in turn, is in force in the Brazilian legal space in the legislation of the doctrine of the irregular situation of the 19th century. The framework, added to other aspects highlighted in the conclusion, poses important obstacles to the implementation of restorative practices in the field of juvenile justice. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-04-28 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/85481 10.5380/rfdufpr.v68i1.85481 |
url |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/85481 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5380/rfdufpr.v68i1.85481 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/85481/49120 https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/downloadSuppFile/85481/54597 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2023 Bruno Jacoby de Lamare, Ana Paula Motta Costa, Victória Hoff da Cunha info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2023 Bruno Jacoby de Lamare, Ana Paula Motta Costa, Victória Hoff da Cunha |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR; v. 68, n. 1 (2023); 137-170 2236-7284 0104-3315 10.5380/rfdufpr.v68i1 reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) instacron:UFPR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
instacron_str |
UFPR |
institution |
UFPR |
reponame_str |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireito@ufpr.br |
_version_ |
1799766285995737088 |