TORT LAW, JUSTICE AND INSTITUTIONAL REGIME: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE WELFARE STATE AND ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zanitelli, Leandro Martins
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/38089
Resumo: The paper distinguishes two types of institutional regime, welfare state and economic democracy, and attempts to determine which tort rules are most suited to each one of them. It argues in favor of two central claims, namely, that a tendency for the adoption of strict liability rules in Brazilian law coheres with welfare state’s capitalist way of production, and that strict liability rules are also required by economic democracy, a kind of institutional regime in which the problem of externalities, though probably minored, still exists. In so doing, the paper also illustrates a (“indirect”) way of examining issues of private law through the lens of justice, which consists in first electing the type of institutional regime most prone to the realization of the principles of justice and inquiring thereafter about which rules of private law are fitted for that regime.
id UFPR-3_9603ea66c82c855a4221016d80c76828
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/38089
network_acronym_str UFPR-3
network_name_str Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling TORT LAW, JUSTICE AND INSTITUTIONAL REGIME: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE WELFARE STATE AND ECONOMIC DEMOCRACYRESPONSABILIDADE CIVIL, JUSTIÇA E REGIME INSTITUCIONAL: UMA COMPARAÇÃO ENTRE O ESTADO DE BEM-ESTAR E A DEMOCRACIA ECONÔMICAEconomic democracy. Externalities. Justice. Tort law. Welfare state.Direito; Direito CivilDemocracia econômica. Estado de bem-estar. Externalidades. Justiça. Responsabilidade civil.The paper distinguishes two types of institutional regime, welfare state and economic democracy, and attempts to determine which tort rules are most suited to each one of them. It argues in favor of two central claims, namely, that a tendency for the adoption of strict liability rules in Brazilian law coheres with welfare state’s capitalist way of production, and that strict liability rules are also required by economic democracy, a kind of institutional regime in which the problem of externalities, though probably minored, still exists. In so doing, the paper also illustrates a (“indirect”) way of examining issues of private law through the lens of justice, which consists in first electing the type of institutional regime most prone to the realization of the principles of justice and inquiring thereafter about which rules of private law are fitted for that regime.O trabalho diferencia dois tipos de regime institucional – o Estado de bem-estar e a democracia econômica, e procura determinar as características gerais da responsabilidade civil mais consentâneas com cada um deles. Argumenta-se em favor de duas afirmações centrais, a saber, primeiro, a de que a tendência à objetivação da responsabilidade civil verificada no direito brasileiro é adequada ao modo de produção do Estado de bem-estar e, segundo, a de que essa objetivação também se coaduna com a democracia econômica, regime sob o qual o problema das externalidades relacionadas ao volume da produção se abranda, mas não desaparece. Com isso, o artigo também ilustra uma maneira (“indireta”) de aplicar a justiça a problemas de direito civil, a qual consiste em verificar inicialmente qual o tipo de regime institucional mais propenso à realização dos princípios da justiça, para então inquirir sobre as características do direito civil mais congruentes com esse regime..Zanitelli, Leandro Martins2015-02-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/3808910.5380/rfdufpr.v60i2.38089Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR; v. 60, n. 2 (2015); 141-1552236-72840104-331510.5380/rfdufpr.v60i2reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/38089/26048https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/downloadSuppFile/38089/20100info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-08-31T12:04:04Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/38089Revistahttp://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs2/index.php/direitoPUBhttp://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs/index.php/direito/oai||revistadireito@ufpr.br2236-72840104-3315opendoar:2015-08-31T12:04:04Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv TORT LAW, JUSTICE AND INSTITUTIONAL REGIME: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE WELFARE STATE AND ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY
RESPONSABILIDADE CIVIL, JUSTIÇA E REGIME INSTITUCIONAL: UMA COMPARAÇÃO ENTRE O ESTADO DE BEM-ESTAR E A DEMOCRACIA ECONÔMICA
title TORT LAW, JUSTICE AND INSTITUTIONAL REGIME: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE WELFARE STATE AND ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY
spellingShingle TORT LAW, JUSTICE AND INSTITUTIONAL REGIME: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE WELFARE STATE AND ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY
Zanitelli, Leandro Martins
Economic democracy. Externalities. Justice. Tort law. Welfare state.
Direito; Direito Civil
Democracia econômica. Estado de bem-estar. Externalidades. Justiça. Responsabilidade civil.
title_short TORT LAW, JUSTICE AND INSTITUTIONAL REGIME: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE WELFARE STATE AND ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY
title_full TORT LAW, JUSTICE AND INSTITUTIONAL REGIME: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE WELFARE STATE AND ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY
title_fullStr TORT LAW, JUSTICE AND INSTITUTIONAL REGIME: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE WELFARE STATE AND ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY
title_full_unstemmed TORT LAW, JUSTICE AND INSTITUTIONAL REGIME: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE WELFARE STATE AND ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY
title_sort TORT LAW, JUSTICE AND INSTITUTIONAL REGIME: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE WELFARE STATE AND ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY
author Zanitelli, Leandro Martins
author_facet Zanitelli, Leandro Martins
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zanitelli, Leandro Martins
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Economic democracy. Externalities. Justice. Tort law. Welfare state.
Direito; Direito Civil
Democracia econômica. Estado de bem-estar. Externalidades. Justiça. Responsabilidade civil.
topic Economic democracy. Externalities. Justice. Tort law. Welfare state.
Direito; Direito Civil
Democracia econômica. Estado de bem-estar. Externalidades. Justiça. Responsabilidade civil.
description The paper distinguishes two types of institutional regime, welfare state and economic democracy, and attempts to determine which tort rules are most suited to each one of them. It argues in favor of two central claims, namely, that a tendency for the adoption of strict liability rules in Brazilian law coheres with welfare state’s capitalist way of production, and that strict liability rules are also required by economic democracy, a kind of institutional regime in which the problem of externalities, though probably minored, still exists. In so doing, the paper also illustrates a (“indirect”) way of examining issues of private law through the lens of justice, which consists in first electing the type of institutional regime most prone to the realization of the principles of justice and inquiring thereafter about which rules of private law are fitted for that regime.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-02-25
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/38089
10.5380/rfdufpr.v60i2.38089
url https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/38089
identifier_str_mv 10.5380/rfdufpr.v60i2.38089
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/38089/26048
https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/downloadSuppFile/38089/20100
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv .
publisher.none.fl_str_mv .
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR; v. 60, n. 2 (2015); 141-155
2236-7284
0104-3315
10.5380/rfdufpr.v60i2
reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)
collection Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireito@ufpr.br
_version_ 1799766287877931008