ASPECTOS POLÍTICOS DA TEORIA DE FLÁVIO VILLAÇA: O PROGRESSISMO URBANÍSTICO EM TEMPOS DE ABERTURA DEMOCRÁTICA

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Campos Andrade Lamparelli, Júlio
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Geografar
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufpr.br/geografar/article/view/78235
Resumo: Even in not always an immediate way, Flavio Villaça’s reflections on Brazilian cities keep a certain relation with the political setting of his time – mainly the historical time starting as from the democratic opening. Taking the theoretical aspects of his work into account and assuming they underlie his more political writings about Urban Planning in Brazil, one may say the reflections of the author are oriented as a whole towards the following theme: to distribute in a less unequal way the location-commodities. The theory adds to what we are calling “urbanistic progressivism”: the field of forces which was opened in Brazilian urban planning, especially in the left wing town halls of that ending century, with a highlight to São Paulo’s experience of 1989-92. Such experiences can be grasped here as an attempt to politicize market instruments, combining, broadly speaking, the following structure: the creation of public funds raised upon the capture of real estate resources, intended in general to the democratization of the housing market. The formation of a “theory and practice” complex reveals, in its turn, that thought and politics ran along the same lines: to fight social injustice by means of market mechanisms.  Insofar as it is a marxist theory- Villaça’s theory, in this case- it does not come as a surprise that the impasses faced by practice all along the New Republic were, as a rule, anticipated by theoretical paradoxes contained in the autor’s work.
id UFPR-7_474276c29476eb7b97abb5d740f09a10
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/78235
network_acronym_str UFPR-7
network_name_str Revista Geografar
repository_id_str
spelling ASPECTOS POLÍTICOS DA TEORIA DE FLÁVIO VILLAÇA: O PROGRESSISMO URBANÍSTICO EM TEMPOS DE ABERTURA DEMOCRÁTICAPOLITICAL ASPECTS OF FLÁVIO VILLAÇA'S THEORY: URBAN PROGRESSIVISM IN TIMES OF DEMOCRATIC OPENINGPlanejamento Urbano; Plano Diretor; Nova República; Setor ImobiliárioUrban Planning; Master Plan; New Republic; Real Estate SectorEven in not always an immediate way, Flavio Villaça’s reflections on Brazilian cities keep a certain relation with the political setting of his time – mainly the historical time starting as from the democratic opening. Taking the theoretical aspects of his work into account and assuming they underlie his more political writings about Urban Planning in Brazil, one may say the reflections of the author are oriented as a whole towards the following theme: to distribute in a less unequal way the location-commodities. The theory adds to what we are calling “urbanistic progressivism”: the field of forces which was opened in Brazilian urban planning, especially in the left wing town halls of that ending century, with a highlight to São Paulo’s experience of 1989-92. Such experiences can be grasped here as an attempt to politicize market instruments, combining, broadly speaking, the following structure: the creation of public funds raised upon the capture of real estate resources, intended in general to the democratization of the housing market. The formation of a “theory and practice” complex reveals, in its turn, that thought and politics ran along the same lines: to fight social injustice by means of market mechanisms.  Insofar as it is a marxist theory- Villaça’s theory, in this case- it does not come as a surprise that the impasses faced by practice all along the New Republic were, as a rule, anticipated by theoretical paradoxes contained in the autor’s work.Ainda que de modo nem sempre imediato, as reflexões de Flávio Villaça sobre as cidades brasileiras guardam certa relação com o ambiente político de seu tempo – sobretudo o tempo histórico que se inicia a partir da abertura democrática.  Levando em conta os aspectos teóricos de sua obra, como fossem subjacentes aos escritos mais políticos sobre o Planejamento Urbano no Brasil, pode-se dizer que as reflexões do autor se orientam, como um todo, para o seguinte lema: distribuir de modo menos desigual as mercadorias-localização.  A teoria soma-se, então, àquilo que estamos chamando de “progressismo urbanístico”: o campo de forças que se abriu no planejamento urbano brasileiro, em especial nas prefeituras de esquerda daquele fim de século, com destaque para a experiência paulista de 1989-92. Tais experiências podem ser aqui entendidas como uma tentativa de politizar os instrumentos de mercado, combinando, grosso modo, a seguinte estrutura: a criação de fundos públicos angariados mediante captura de recursos imobiliários, destinados de modo geral à democratização do mercado habitacional. A formação de um complexo “teoria e prática” revela, por sua vez, que pensamento e política corriam sob os mesmos trilhos: combater a injustiça social por meio dos mecanismos de mercado. Em se tratando de uma teoria marxista – a de Villaça, no caso – não é de se surpreender que os impasses que a prática encontrará ao longo da Nova República estivessem, via de regra, antecipados por paradoxos teóricos no interior da obra do autor. UFPRFaculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo da Universidade de São Paulo (FAUUSP)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)de Campos Andrade Lamparelli, Júlio2021-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/geografar/article/view/7823510.5380/geografar.v16i2.78235REVISTA GEOGRAFAR; v. 16, n. 2 (2021); 318-3341981-089X10.5380/geografar.v16i2reponame:Revista Geografarinstname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/geografar/article/view/78235/45219https://revistas.ufpr.br/geografar/article/view/78235/45524Direitos autorais 2021 Júlio de Campos Andrade Lamparellihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-12-31T16:14:22Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/78235Revistahttps://revistas.ufpr.br/geografarPUBhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/geografar/oai||geografar@ufpr.br1981-089X1981-089Xopendoar:2021-12-31T16:14:22Revista Geografar - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ASPECTOS POLÍTICOS DA TEORIA DE FLÁVIO VILLAÇA: O PROGRESSISMO URBANÍSTICO EM TEMPOS DE ABERTURA DEMOCRÁTICA
POLITICAL ASPECTS OF FLÁVIO VILLAÇA'S THEORY: URBAN PROGRESSIVISM IN TIMES OF DEMOCRATIC OPENING
title ASPECTOS POLÍTICOS DA TEORIA DE FLÁVIO VILLAÇA: O PROGRESSISMO URBANÍSTICO EM TEMPOS DE ABERTURA DEMOCRÁTICA
spellingShingle ASPECTOS POLÍTICOS DA TEORIA DE FLÁVIO VILLAÇA: O PROGRESSISMO URBANÍSTICO EM TEMPOS DE ABERTURA DEMOCRÁTICA
de Campos Andrade Lamparelli, Júlio
Planejamento Urbano; Plano Diretor; Nova República; Setor Imobiliário
Urban Planning; Master Plan; New Republic; Real Estate Sector
title_short ASPECTOS POLÍTICOS DA TEORIA DE FLÁVIO VILLAÇA: O PROGRESSISMO URBANÍSTICO EM TEMPOS DE ABERTURA DEMOCRÁTICA
title_full ASPECTOS POLÍTICOS DA TEORIA DE FLÁVIO VILLAÇA: O PROGRESSISMO URBANÍSTICO EM TEMPOS DE ABERTURA DEMOCRÁTICA
title_fullStr ASPECTOS POLÍTICOS DA TEORIA DE FLÁVIO VILLAÇA: O PROGRESSISMO URBANÍSTICO EM TEMPOS DE ABERTURA DEMOCRÁTICA
title_full_unstemmed ASPECTOS POLÍTICOS DA TEORIA DE FLÁVIO VILLAÇA: O PROGRESSISMO URBANÍSTICO EM TEMPOS DE ABERTURA DEMOCRÁTICA
title_sort ASPECTOS POLÍTICOS DA TEORIA DE FLÁVIO VILLAÇA: O PROGRESSISMO URBANÍSTICO EM TEMPOS DE ABERTURA DEMOCRÁTICA
author de Campos Andrade Lamparelli, Júlio
author_facet de Campos Andrade Lamparelli, Júlio
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo da Universidade de São Paulo (FAUUSP)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Campos Andrade Lamparelli, Júlio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Planejamento Urbano; Plano Diretor; Nova República; Setor Imobiliário
Urban Planning; Master Plan; New Republic; Real Estate Sector
topic Planejamento Urbano; Plano Diretor; Nova República; Setor Imobiliário
Urban Planning; Master Plan; New Republic; Real Estate Sector
description Even in not always an immediate way, Flavio Villaça’s reflections on Brazilian cities keep a certain relation with the political setting of his time – mainly the historical time starting as from the democratic opening. Taking the theoretical aspects of his work into account and assuming they underlie his more political writings about Urban Planning in Brazil, one may say the reflections of the author are oriented as a whole towards the following theme: to distribute in a less unequal way the location-commodities. The theory adds to what we are calling “urbanistic progressivism”: the field of forces which was opened in Brazilian urban planning, especially in the left wing town halls of that ending century, with a highlight to São Paulo’s experience of 1989-92. Such experiences can be grasped here as an attempt to politicize market instruments, combining, broadly speaking, the following structure: the creation of public funds raised upon the capture of real estate resources, intended in general to the democratization of the housing market. The formation of a “theory and practice” complex reveals, in its turn, that thought and politics ran along the same lines: to fight social injustice by means of market mechanisms.  Insofar as it is a marxist theory- Villaça’s theory, in this case- it does not come as a surprise that the impasses faced by practice all along the New Republic were, as a rule, anticipated by theoretical paradoxes contained in the autor’s work.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-31
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/geografar/article/view/78235
10.5380/geografar.v16i2.78235
url https://revistas.ufpr.br/geografar/article/view/78235
identifier_str_mv 10.5380/geografar.v16i2.78235
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/geografar/article/view/78235/45219
https://revistas.ufpr.br/geografar/article/view/78235/45524
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2021 Júlio de Campos Andrade Lamparelli
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2021 Júlio de Campos Andrade Lamparelli
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFPR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFPR
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA GEOGRAFAR; v. 16, n. 2 (2021); 318-334
1981-089X
10.5380/geografar.v16i2
reponame:Revista Geografar
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Revista Geografar
collection Revista Geografar
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Geografar - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||geografar@ufpr.br
_version_ 1788990019932782592