Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Ciências Agrárias (Belém. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ajaes.ufra.edu.br/index.php/ajaes/article/view/2765 |
Resumo: | The pineapple cv. Vitória has shown high productivity in relation to other cultivars. However, this cultivar is still little adopted due to the low availability and high cost of seedlings. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost of production and make an economic evaluation of cv. Vitória, comparing it with the estimated costs for ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’. The comparative results showed a profit of approximately 160% higher than cv. Pérola for cv. Vitória and 237% higher than cv. Smooth Cayenne, in single and double row planting, respectively. The profit per fruit in cv. Vitória was 54.7% higher than the ‘Pérola’ pineapple and 124.6% higher than ‘Smooth Cayenne’. Considering the evaluated phytosanitary risk, the profit per fruit in cv. Vitória was 163% and 337% higher in relation to ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples, respectively. Among the evaluated options, it is more economically feasible to produce Vitória pineapple due to its greater productivity, profitability, and resistance to fusariosis. |
id |
UFRA_83322968095533603ba34cabd2623809 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.periodicos.ufra.edu.br:article/2765 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRA |
network_name_str |
Revista de Ciências Agrárias (Belém. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapplesAnálise comparativa de custos de produção e avaliação econômica dos abacaxis ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ e ‘Smooth Cayenne’Ananas comosus var. comosusTechnical coefficientsProfitabilityAnanas comosus var. comosusCoeficientes técnicosLucratividadeThe pineapple cv. Vitória has shown high productivity in relation to other cultivars. However, this cultivar is still little adopted due to the low availability and high cost of seedlings. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost of production and make an economic evaluation of cv. Vitória, comparing it with the estimated costs for ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’. The comparative results showed a profit of approximately 160% higher than cv. Pérola for cv. Vitória and 237% higher than cv. Smooth Cayenne, in single and double row planting, respectively. The profit per fruit in cv. Vitória was 54.7% higher than the ‘Pérola’ pineapple and 124.6% higher than ‘Smooth Cayenne’. Considering the evaluated phytosanitary risk, the profit per fruit in cv. Vitória was 163% and 337% higher in relation to ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples, respectively. Among the evaluated options, it is more economically feasible to produce Vitória pineapple due to its greater productivity, profitability, and resistance to fusariosis.O cultivo do abacaxi ‘Vitória’ tem apresentado alta produtividade em relação às demais cultivares. No entanto, esta cultivar ainda é pouco adotada, em razão da pouca disponibilidade e alto custo das mudas. Objetivou–se com este estudo estimar o custo de produção e fazer a avaliação econômica da cv. Vitória, comparando–a com os custos estimados para as cultivares Pérola e Smooth Cayenne. Os resultados comparativos mostraram para a cv. Vitória um lucro de aproximadamente 160% superior à cv. Pérola e de 237% à cv. Smooth Cayenne, quando cultivada em fileira simples e dupla respectivamente. O lucro por fruto na cv. Vitória foi 54,7% superior em relação ao abacaxi Pérola e de 124,6% ao Smooth Cayenne. Considerando o risco fitossanitário avaliado, o lucro por fruto na cv. Vitória foi 163% superior em relação ao abacaxi ‘Pérola’ e de 337% ao ‘Smooth Cayenne’. Entre as opções avaliadas, ficou evidenciado ser mais viável economicamente produzir o abacaxi Vitória, considerando sua maior produtividade e rentabilidade em função de sua resistência à fusariose.Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia/UFRA2018-09-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextoapplication/pdfhttps://ajaes.ufra.edu.br/index.php/ajaes/article/view/2765Amazonian Journal of Agricultural Sciences Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences; Vol 61 (2018): RCARevista de Ciências Agrárias Amazonian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences; v. 61 (2018): RCA2177-87601517-591Xreponame:Revista de Ciências Agrárias (Belém. Online)instname:Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia (UFRA)instacron:UFRAporhttps://ajaes.ufra.edu.br/index.php/ajaes/article/view/2765/1508Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Agrárias/Amazonian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGaleano, Edileuza Aparecida VitalVentura, José Aires2020-01-20T14:15:08Zoai:ojs.www.periodicos.ufra.edu.br:article/2765Revistahttps://ajaes.ufra.edu.br/index.php/ajaes/PUBhttps://ajaes.ufra.edu.br/index.php/ajaes/oaiallan.lobato@ufra.edu.br || ajaes.suporte@gmail.com2177-87601517-591Xopendoar:2020-01-20T14:15:08Revista de Ciências Agrárias (Belém. Online) - Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia (UFRA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples Análise comparativa de custos de produção e avaliação econômica dos abacaxis ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ e ‘Smooth Cayenne’ |
title |
Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples |
spellingShingle |
Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples Galeano, Edileuza Aparecida Vital Ananas comosus var. comosus Technical coefficients Profitability Ananas comosus var. comosus Coeficientes técnicos Lucratividade |
title_short |
Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples |
title_full |
Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples |
title_fullStr |
Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples |
title_sort |
Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples |
author |
Galeano, Edileuza Aparecida Vital |
author_facet |
Galeano, Edileuza Aparecida Vital Ventura, José Aires |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ventura, José Aires |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Galeano, Edileuza Aparecida Vital Ventura, José Aires |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ananas comosus var. comosus Technical coefficients Profitability Ananas comosus var. comosus Coeficientes técnicos Lucratividade |
topic |
Ananas comosus var. comosus Technical coefficients Profitability Ananas comosus var. comosus Coeficientes técnicos Lucratividade |
description |
The pineapple cv. Vitória has shown high productivity in relation to other cultivars. However, this cultivar is still little adopted due to the low availability and high cost of seedlings. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost of production and make an economic evaluation of cv. Vitória, comparing it with the estimated costs for ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’. The comparative results showed a profit of approximately 160% higher than cv. Pérola for cv. Vitória and 237% higher than cv. Smooth Cayenne, in single and double row planting, respectively. The profit per fruit in cv. Vitória was 54.7% higher than the ‘Pérola’ pineapple and 124.6% higher than ‘Smooth Cayenne’. Considering the evaluated phytosanitary risk, the profit per fruit in cv. Vitória was 163% and 337% higher in relation to ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples, respectively. Among the evaluated options, it is more economically feasible to produce Vitória pineapple due to its greater productivity, profitability, and resistance to fusariosis. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ajaes.ufra.edu.br/index.php/ajaes/article/view/2765 |
url |
https://ajaes.ufra.edu.br/index.php/ajaes/article/view/2765 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ajaes.ufra.edu.br/index.php/ajaes/article/view/2765/1508 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia/UFRA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia/UFRA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Amazonian Journal of Agricultural Sciences Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences; Vol 61 (2018): RCA Revista de Ciências Agrárias Amazonian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences; v. 61 (2018): RCA 2177-8760 1517-591X reponame:Revista de Ciências Agrárias (Belém. Online) instname:Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia (UFRA) instacron:UFRA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia (UFRA) |
instacron_str |
UFRA |
institution |
UFRA |
reponame_str |
Revista de Ciências Agrárias (Belém. Online) |
collection |
Revista de Ciências Agrárias (Belém. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Ciências Agrárias (Belém. Online) - Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia (UFRA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
allan.lobato@ufra.edu.br || ajaes.suporte@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797231629819707392 |