Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Galeano, Edileuza Aparecida Vital
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Ventura, José Aires
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Ciências Agrárias (Belém. Online)
Texto Completo: https://ajaes.ufra.edu.br/index.php/ajaes/article/view/2765
Resumo: The pineapple cv. Vitória has shown high productivity in relation to other cultivars. However, this cultivar is still little adopted due to the low availability and high cost of seedlings. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost of production and make an economic evaluation of cv. Vitória, comparing it with the estimated costs for ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’. The comparative results showed a profit of approximately 160% higher than cv. Pérola for cv. Vitória and 237% higher than cv. Smooth Cayenne, in single and double row planting, respectively. The profit per fruit in cv. Vitória was 54.7% higher than the ‘Pérola’ pineapple and 124.6% higher than ‘Smooth Cayenne’. Considering the evaluated phytosanitary risk, the profit per fruit in cv. Vitória was 163% and 337% higher in relation to ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples, respectively. Among the evaluated options, it is more economically feasible to produce Vitória pineapple due to its greater productivity, profitability, and resistance to fusariosis.
id UFRA_83322968095533603ba34cabd2623809
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.periodicos.ufra.edu.br:article/2765
network_acronym_str UFRA
network_name_str Revista de Ciências Agrárias (Belém. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapplesAnálise comparativa de custos de produção e avaliação econômica dos abacaxis ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ e ‘Smooth Cayenne’Ananas comosus var. comosusTechnical coefficientsProfitabilityAnanas comosus var. comosusCoeficientes técnicosLucratividadeThe pineapple cv. Vitória has shown high productivity in relation to other cultivars. However, this cultivar is still little adopted due to the low availability and high cost of seedlings. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost of production and make an economic evaluation of cv. Vitória, comparing it with the estimated costs for ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’. The comparative results showed a profit of approximately 160% higher than cv. Pérola for cv. Vitória and 237% higher than cv. Smooth Cayenne, in single and double row planting, respectively. The profit per fruit in cv. Vitória was 54.7% higher than the ‘Pérola’ pineapple and 124.6% higher than ‘Smooth Cayenne’. Considering the evaluated phytosanitary risk, the profit per fruit in cv. Vitória was 163% and 337% higher in relation to ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples, respectively. Among the evaluated options, it is more economically feasible to produce Vitória pineapple due to its greater productivity, profitability, and resistance to fusariosis.O cultivo do abacaxi ‘Vitória’ tem apresentado alta produtividade em relação às demais cultivares. No entanto, esta cultivar ainda é pouco adotada, em razão da pouca disponibilidade e alto custo das mudas. Objetivou–se com este estudo estimar o custo de produção e fazer a avaliação econômica da cv. Vitória, comparando–a com os custos estimados para as cultivares Pérola e Smooth Cayenne. Os resultados comparativos mostraram para a cv. Vitória um lucro de aproximadamente 160% superior à cv. Pérola e de 237% à cv. Smooth Cayenne, quando cultivada em fileira simples e dupla respectivamente. O lucro por fruto na cv. Vitória foi 54,7% superior em relação ao abacaxi Pérola e de 124,6% ao Smooth Cayenne. Considerando o risco fitossanitário avaliado, o lucro por fruto na cv. Vitória foi 163% superior em relação ao abacaxi ‘Pérola’ e de 337% ao ‘Smooth Cayenne’. Entre as opções avaliadas, ficou evidenciado ser mais viável economicamente produzir o abacaxi Vitória, considerando sua maior produtividade e rentabilidade em função de sua resistência à fusariose.Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia/UFRA2018-09-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontextoapplication/pdfhttps://ajaes.ufra.edu.br/index.php/ajaes/article/view/2765Amazonian Journal of Agricultural Sciences Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences; Vol 61 (2018): RCARevista de Ciências Agrárias Amazonian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences; v. 61 (2018): RCA2177-87601517-591Xreponame:Revista de Ciências Agrárias (Belém. Online)instname:Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia (UFRA)instacron:UFRAporhttps://ajaes.ufra.edu.br/index.php/ajaes/article/view/2765/1508Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Agrárias/Amazonian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGaleano, Edileuza Aparecida VitalVentura, José Aires2020-01-20T14:15:08Zoai:ojs.www.periodicos.ufra.edu.br:article/2765Revistahttps://ajaes.ufra.edu.br/index.php/ajaes/PUBhttps://ajaes.ufra.edu.br/index.php/ajaes/oaiallan.lobato@ufra.edu.br || ajaes.suporte@gmail.com2177-87601517-591Xopendoar:2020-01-20T14:15:08Revista de Ciências Agrárias (Belém. Online) - Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia (UFRA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples
Análise comparativa de custos de produção e avaliação econômica dos abacaxis ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ e ‘Smooth Cayenne’
title Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples
spellingShingle Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples
Galeano, Edileuza Aparecida Vital
Ananas comosus var. comosus
Technical coefficients
Profitability
Ananas comosus var. comosus
Coeficientes técnicos
Lucratividade
title_short Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples
title_full Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples
title_sort Comparative analysis of production costs and economic evaluation of ‘Vitória’, ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples
author Galeano, Edileuza Aparecida Vital
author_facet Galeano, Edileuza Aparecida Vital
Ventura, José Aires
author_role author
author2 Ventura, José Aires
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Galeano, Edileuza Aparecida Vital
Ventura, José Aires
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ananas comosus var. comosus
Technical coefficients
Profitability
Ananas comosus var. comosus
Coeficientes técnicos
Lucratividade
topic Ananas comosus var. comosus
Technical coefficients
Profitability
Ananas comosus var. comosus
Coeficientes técnicos
Lucratividade
description The pineapple cv. Vitória has shown high productivity in relation to other cultivars. However, this cultivar is still little adopted due to the low availability and high cost of seedlings. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost of production and make an economic evaluation of cv. Vitória, comparing it with the estimated costs for ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’. The comparative results showed a profit of approximately 160% higher than cv. Pérola for cv. Vitória and 237% higher than cv. Smooth Cayenne, in single and double row planting, respectively. The profit per fruit in cv. Vitória was 54.7% higher than the ‘Pérola’ pineapple and 124.6% higher than ‘Smooth Cayenne’. Considering the evaluated phytosanitary risk, the profit per fruit in cv. Vitória was 163% and 337% higher in relation to ‘Pérola’ and ‘Smooth Cayenne’ pineapples, respectively. Among the evaluated options, it is more economically feasible to produce Vitória pineapple due to its greater productivity, profitability, and resistance to fusariosis.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
texto
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ajaes.ufra.edu.br/index.php/ajaes/article/view/2765
url https://ajaes.ufra.edu.br/index.php/ajaes/article/view/2765
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ajaes.ufra.edu.br/index.php/ajaes/article/view/2765/1508
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia/UFRA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia/UFRA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Amazonian Journal of Agricultural Sciences Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences; Vol 61 (2018): RCA
Revista de Ciências Agrárias Amazonian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences; v. 61 (2018): RCA
2177-8760
1517-591X
reponame:Revista de Ciências Agrárias (Belém. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia (UFRA)
instacron:UFRA
instname_str Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia (UFRA)
instacron_str UFRA
institution UFRA
reponame_str Revista de Ciências Agrárias (Belém. Online)
collection Revista de Ciências Agrárias (Belém. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências Agrárias (Belém. Online) - Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia (UFRA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv allan.lobato@ufra.edu.br || ajaes.suporte@gmail.com
_version_ 1797231629819707392