The "anti psychologism" in Husserl and Heidegger: from consciousness to dasein

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carmo, Ísis Nery do
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Griot : Revista de Filosofia
Texto Completo: http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/791
Resumo: Our aim is to propose a dialogue between Husserl and Heidegger relating them from the criticism that these philosophers present to the investigation of naturalistic aspect about man, predominant in the philosophical tradition. For Husserl, the domain of naturalism represents the influence of Experimental Psychology on philosophy, Heidegger, in turn, highlights the anthropological thematic found in the history of philosophy. According to the first, "psychologism" entails the reduction of man to his empirical components, and to the second, "anthropologism" is equivalent to a process of man’s reification. "Psychologism" and "anthropologism" are inadequate reflections because they equate man with the natural object, that is, reflections that do not consider man's true sense of being, ignoring intentional consciousness and existence. Thus Husserl and Heidegger share the attempt to make philosophy return to that true essence of man, that is, both philosophers advocate the denaturalization of reflection and develop phenomenology as the exercise of this return.
id UFRB-4_07a39031016d70becb034a248b9f4793
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/791
network_acronym_str UFRB-4
network_name_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository_id_str
spelling The "anti psychologism" in Husserl and Heidegger: from consciousness to daseinO “antipsicologismo” em Husserl e Heidegger: da consciência ao daseinFenomenologia; Psicologismo; Antropologismo; Consciência; Existência.Phenomenology; Psychologism; Anthropologism; Consciousness; ExistenceOur aim is to propose a dialogue between Husserl and Heidegger relating them from the criticism that these philosophers present to the investigation of naturalistic aspect about man, predominant in the philosophical tradition. For Husserl, the domain of naturalism represents the influence of Experimental Psychology on philosophy, Heidegger, in turn, highlights the anthropological thematic found in the history of philosophy. According to the first, "psychologism" entails the reduction of man to his empirical components, and to the second, "anthropologism" is equivalent to a process of man’s reification. "Psychologism" and "anthropologism" are inadequate reflections because they equate man with the natural object, that is, reflections that do not consider man's true sense of being, ignoring intentional consciousness and existence. Thus Husserl and Heidegger share the attempt to make philosophy return to that true essence of man, that is, both philosophers advocate the denaturalization of reflection and develop phenomenology as the exercise of this return.O nosso objetivo é propor um diálogo entre Husserl e Heidegger relacionando-os a partir da crítica que estes filósofos apresentam à investigação de viés naturalista acerca do homem, predominante na tradição filosófica. Para Husserl, o domínio do naturalismo representa a influência da Psicologia Experimental na filosofia, Heidegger, por sua vez, destaca a temática antropológica encontrada na história da filosofia. De acordo com o primeiro, o “psicologismo” acarreta na redução do homem aos seus componentes empíricos, para o segundo, o “antropologismo” equivale a um processo de coisificação do homem. O “psicologismo” e o “antropologismo” são reflexões inadequadas pois equiparam o homem ao objeto natural, isto é, são reflexões que não consideram o verdadeiro sentido de ser do homem, ignorando a consciência intencional e a existência. Logo, Husserl e Heidegger compartilham a tentativa de fazer a filosofia retornar sobre aquele âmbito que compõe propriamente o homem, ou seja, ambos filósofos defendem a desnaturalização da reflexão e desenvolvem a fenomenologia como o exercício de tal retorno.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2018-06-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/79110.31977/grirfi.v17i1.791Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 17 n. 1 (2018); 326-3362178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/791/505Copyright (c) 2018 Ísis Nery do Carmoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarmo, Ísis Nery do2020-06-30T18:15:08Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/791Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:15:08Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The "anti psychologism" in Husserl and Heidegger: from consciousness to dasein
O “antipsicologismo” em Husserl e Heidegger: da consciência ao dasein
title The "anti psychologism" in Husserl and Heidegger: from consciousness to dasein
spellingShingle The "anti psychologism" in Husserl and Heidegger: from consciousness to dasein
Carmo, Ísis Nery do
Fenomenologia; Psicologismo; Antropologismo; Consciência; Existência.
Phenomenology; Psychologism; Anthropologism; Consciousness; Existence
title_short The "anti psychologism" in Husserl and Heidegger: from consciousness to dasein
title_full The "anti psychologism" in Husserl and Heidegger: from consciousness to dasein
title_fullStr The "anti psychologism" in Husserl and Heidegger: from consciousness to dasein
title_full_unstemmed The "anti psychologism" in Husserl and Heidegger: from consciousness to dasein
title_sort The "anti psychologism" in Husserl and Heidegger: from consciousness to dasein
author Carmo, Ísis Nery do
author_facet Carmo, Ísis Nery do
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carmo, Ísis Nery do
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fenomenologia; Psicologismo; Antropologismo; Consciência; Existência.
Phenomenology; Psychologism; Anthropologism; Consciousness; Existence
topic Fenomenologia; Psicologismo; Antropologismo; Consciência; Existência.
Phenomenology; Psychologism; Anthropologism; Consciousness; Existence
description Our aim is to propose a dialogue between Husserl and Heidegger relating them from the criticism that these philosophers present to the investigation of naturalistic aspect about man, predominant in the philosophical tradition. For Husserl, the domain of naturalism represents the influence of Experimental Psychology on philosophy, Heidegger, in turn, highlights the anthropological thematic found in the history of philosophy. According to the first, "psychologism" entails the reduction of man to his empirical components, and to the second, "anthropologism" is equivalent to a process of man’s reification. "Psychologism" and "anthropologism" are inadequate reflections because they equate man with the natural object, that is, reflections that do not consider man's true sense of being, ignoring intentional consciousness and existence. Thus Husserl and Heidegger share the attempt to make philosophy return to that true essence of man, that is, both philosophers advocate the denaturalization of reflection and develop phenomenology as the exercise of this return.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-Reviewed
Evaluados por los pares
Avaliados pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/791
10.31977/grirfi.v17i1.791
url http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/791
identifier_str_mv 10.31977/grirfi.v17i1.791
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/791/505
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Ísis Nery do Carmo
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Ísis Nery do Carmo
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 17 n. 1 (2018); 326-336
2178-1036
reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia
instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron:UFRB
instname_str Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron_str UFRB
institution UFRB
reponame_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
collection Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||griotrevista@gmail.com
_version_ 1754732699193442304