The concept of “my nature” in Descartes Metaphysical Meditations’: regarding a practical-self in cartesianism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
Texto Completo: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1310 |
Resumo: | What is the status of the concept of "my nature" in Descartes' Metaphysical Meditations? That is the inquiry of this article. In order to answer it, the present study is divided into two moments. In the first part of the work, I intend to investigate the concept of “my nature” as it appears specially in the first two meditations, namely, as the nature of the common sense; which needs to be overcome in order to give rise to a theory of knowledge accordingly to the natural light of reason. In the second part of the work, notably through the analysis of the sixth meditation, I try to elucidate that, despite its impertinence to a theory of knowledge, the notion of “my nature” is, conversely, the fundamental building bloc of a Cartesian practical philosophy. And this, however, entails some cost for Cartesian metaphysics in general. Surely, Descartes’ theory of knowledge is wholly based on a priori elements (i.e., necessity, universality and innatism); but his practical philosophy, in turn, and this is the point to be stressed, since founded on the mixture of reason and senses, must be constructed almost entirely in a contingent and experimental soil. |
id |
UFRB-4_251c04fbd65373d2ac6864e289db0f61 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/1310 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The concept of “my nature” in Descartes Metaphysical Meditations’: regarding a practical-self in cartesianismA noção de “minha natureza” nas “Meditações Metafísicas” de Descartes: sobre um eu-prático no cartesianismoDescartes; Minha natureza; Sexta meditação.Descartes; My nature; Sixth meditation.What is the status of the concept of "my nature" in Descartes' Metaphysical Meditations? That is the inquiry of this article. In order to answer it, the present study is divided into two moments. In the first part of the work, I intend to investigate the concept of “my nature” as it appears specially in the first two meditations, namely, as the nature of the common sense; which needs to be overcome in order to give rise to a theory of knowledge accordingly to the natural light of reason. In the second part of the work, notably through the analysis of the sixth meditation, I try to elucidate that, despite its impertinence to a theory of knowledge, the notion of “my nature” is, conversely, the fundamental building bloc of a Cartesian practical philosophy. And this, however, entails some cost for Cartesian metaphysics in general. Surely, Descartes’ theory of knowledge is wholly based on a priori elements (i.e., necessity, universality and innatism); but his practical philosophy, in turn, and this is the point to be stressed, since founded on the mixture of reason and senses, must be constructed almost entirely in a contingent and experimental soil.Qual o estatuto da noção de “minha natureza” nas “Meditações Metafísicas” de Descartes? Esta é a questão do presente artigo. Para respondê-la, o estudo se divide em duas partes. Num primeiro momento, mais enxuto, trata-se de investigar a referida noção tal como ela aparece, sobretudo, nas duas primeiras meditações, a saber: como a natureza do senso comum, a qual requer ser superada com vistas a dar lugar a uma noção de natureza propriamente filosófica, guiada pelo que se denomina nas “Meditações” por “luz natural”. Num segundo momento do trabalho, mais alongado e seminal, notadamente através da análise da sexta meditação, trata-se de evidenciar que se a noção de “minha natureza” em nada auxilia na tarefa de uma teoria do conhecimento, para uma filosofia prática em específico será justamente a ela que o autor se verá obrigado a recorrer. O que comporta, contudo, algum custo para a metafísica cartesiana de maneira geral. Pois se a sua teoria do conhecimento está inteiramente baseada em elementos a priori (isto é, necessários, universais e inatos), a sua filosofia prática, por sua vez, porquanto fundada numa mistura entre razão e sentimentos, precisará ser edificada quase que inteiramente num solo contingencial e experimental.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2020-02-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/131010.31977/grirfi.v20i1.1310Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 1 (2020); 106-1172178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1310/970Copyright (c) 2020 Bruno Santos Alexandreinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos Alexandre, Bruno2020-06-30T18:13:25Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/1310Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:13:25Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The concept of “my nature” in Descartes Metaphysical Meditations’: regarding a practical-self in cartesianism A noção de “minha natureza” nas “Meditações Metafísicas” de Descartes: sobre um eu-prático no cartesianismo |
title |
The concept of “my nature” in Descartes Metaphysical Meditations’: regarding a practical-self in cartesianism |
spellingShingle |
The concept of “my nature” in Descartes Metaphysical Meditations’: regarding a practical-self in cartesianism Santos Alexandre, Bruno Descartes; Minha natureza; Sexta meditação. Descartes; My nature; Sixth meditation. |
title_short |
The concept of “my nature” in Descartes Metaphysical Meditations’: regarding a practical-self in cartesianism |
title_full |
The concept of “my nature” in Descartes Metaphysical Meditations’: regarding a practical-self in cartesianism |
title_fullStr |
The concept of “my nature” in Descartes Metaphysical Meditations’: regarding a practical-self in cartesianism |
title_full_unstemmed |
The concept of “my nature” in Descartes Metaphysical Meditations’: regarding a practical-self in cartesianism |
title_sort |
The concept of “my nature” in Descartes Metaphysical Meditations’: regarding a practical-self in cartesianism |
author |
Santos Alexandre, Bruno |
author_facet |
Santos Alexandre, Bruno |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos Alexandre, Bruno |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Descartes; Minha natureza; Sexta meditação. Descartes; My nature; Sixth meditation. |
topic |
Descartes; Minha natureza; Sexta meditação. Descartes; My nature; Sixth meditation. |
description |
What is the status of the concept of "my nature" in Descartes' Metaphysical Meditations? That is the inquiry of this article. In order to answer it, the present study is divided into two moments. In the first part of the work, I intend to investigate the concept of “my nature” as it appears specially in the first two meditations, namely, as the nature of the common sense; which needs to be overcome in order to give rise to a theory of knowledge accordingly to the natural light of reason. In the second part of the work, notably through the analysis of the sixth meditation, I try to elucidate that, despite its impertinence to a theory of knowledge, the notion of “my nature” is, conversely, the fundamental building bloc of a Cartesian practical philosophy. And this, however, entails some cost for Cartesian metaphysics in general. Surely, Descartes’ theory of knowledge is wholly based on a priori elements (i.e., necessity, universality and innatism); but his practical philosophy, in turn, and this is the point to be stressed, since founded on the mixture of reason and senses, must be constructed almost entirely in a contingent and experimental soil. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-02-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1310 10.31977/grirfi.v20i1.1310 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1310 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v20i1.1310 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1310/970 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Bruno Santos Alexandre info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Bruno Santos Alexandre |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 1 (2020); 106-117 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754732699920105472 |