Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulness

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Galantin, Daniel Verginelli
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Griot : Revista de Filosofia
Texto Completo: http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/699
Resumo: After an anylisis of the end of History of madness, we propose an interpretation of Blanchot’s article about it. Our aim is to examine a possible dialogue between them. We defend that the theme which might organize such a dialogue is that of forgetfulness and it’s relation with thought. The guiding question is the possibility of a tought that would march towards an active kind of forgetfulness, which isn’t just the result of memory’s fault. We defend the hypothesis that the blanchotian consideration on forgetfulness might help to understand that of ‘absence of work’ which appears in the end of History of madness ; even though blanchotian thought situated in a space of thought very different from that of Foucault, as the case of it’s concepts, methodology and objects. In the same way, this notion could reverberate more vastly in foucaultian works, even though it won’t be resumed after. We think that such a repercussion concern specially the question of the relation between Foucault’s own researches and the present itself ; and that the dialogue with Blanchot could help to think the critic of the present as an effort to actively forget the present and also oneself.
id UFRB-4_2b0681f44611c3f8a70072859712f4f9
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/699
network_acronym_str UFRB-4
network_name_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository_id_str
spelling Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulnessFoucault e Blanchot: um diálogo possível a partir da ausência de obra e do esquecimentoEsquecimento; Ausência de obra; Crítica; Ética; Política.Fogetfulness ; Worklessness ; Critics ; Ethics ; PoliticsAfter an anylisis of the end of History of madness, we propose an interpretation of Blanchot’s article about it. Our aim is to examine a possible dialogue between them. We defend that the theme which might organize such a dialogue is that of forgetfulness and it’s relation with thought. The guiding question is the possibility of a tought that would march towards an active kind of forgetfulness, which isn’t just the result of memory’s fault. We defend the hypothesis that the blanchotian consideration on forgetfulness might help to understand that of ‘absence of work’ which appears in the end of History of madness ; even though blanchotian thought situated in a space of thought very different from that of Foucault, as the case of it’s concepts, methodology and objects. In the same way, this notion could reverberate more vastly in foucaultian works, even though it won’t be resumed after. We think that such a repercussion concern specially the question of the relation between Foucault’s own researches and the present itself ; and that the dialogue with Blanchot could help to think the critic of the present as an effort to actively forget the present and also oneself.Após uma análise do final de História da loucura, propomos uma leitura do artigo de Blanchot sobre este livro com o objetivo de explorar um diálogo possível entre ambos os autores. Defendemos que o tema de fundo deste diálogo é a relação entre pensamento e esquecimento. A questão que guia este diálogo concerne à possibilidade da construção de um pensamento que caminharia em direção a um tipo de esquecimento ativo e não de uma falta da memória. Defendemos a hipótese de que a reflexão blanchotiana sobre o esquecimento, ainda que situada num espaço de pensamento diferente daquele de Foucault quanto a conceitos, metodologia e objetos, pode ajudar a compreender a noção de ausência de obra, tal como ela aparece ao final de História da loucura. Ademais, também consideramos que tal noção repercute na obra foucaultiana posterior, mesmo que ela não seja literalmente retomada. Defendemos que tal repercussão concerne especialmente à questão da relação entre o trabalho de Foucault e o presente, bem como argumentamos que o diálogo com Blanchot pode ajudar a pensar a ontologia crítica do presente enquanto esforço de esquecimento ativo do presente e de si mesmo.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2016-06-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/69910.31977/grirfi.v13i1.699Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 13 n. 1 (2016); 13-362178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/699/415Copyright (c) 2016 Daniel Verginelli Galantininfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGalantin, Daniel Verginelli2020-06-30T18:16:28Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/699Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:16:28Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulness
Foucault e Blanchot: um diálogo possível a partir da ausência de obra e do esquecimento
title Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulness
spellingShingle Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulness
Galantin, Daniel Verginelli
Esquecimento; Ausência de obra; Crítica; Ética; Política.
Fogetfulness ; Worklessness ; Critics ; Ethics ; Politics
title_short Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulness
title_full Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulness
title_fullStr Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulness
title_full_unstemmed Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulness
title_sort Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulness
author Galantin, Daniel Verginelli
author_facet Galantin, Daniel Verginelli
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Galantin, Daniel Verginelli
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Esquecimento; Ausência de obra; Crítica; Ética; Política.
Fogetfulness ; Worklessness ; Critics ; Ethics ; Politics
topic Esquecimento; Ausência de obra; Crítica; Ética; Política.
Fogetfulness ; Worklessness ; Critics ; Ethics ; Politics
description After an anylisis of the end of History of madness, we propose an interpretation of Blanchot’s article about it. Our aim is to examine a possible dialogue between them. We defend that the theme which might organize such a dialogue is that of forgetfulness and it’s relation with thought. The guiding question is the possibility of a tought that would march towards an active kind of forgetfulness, which isn’t just the result of memory’s fault. We defend the hypothesis that the blanchotian consideration on forgetfulness might help to understand that of ‘absence of work’ which appears in the end of History of madness ; even though blanchotian thought situated in a space of thought very different from that of Foucault, as the case of it’s concepts, methodology and objects. In the same way, this notion could reverberate more vastly in foucaultian works, even though it won’t be resumed after. We think that such a repercussion concern specially the question of the relation between Foucault’s own researches and the present itself ; and that the dialogue with Blanchot could help to think the critic of the present as an effort to actively forget the present and also oneself.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-Reviewed
Evaluados por los pares
Avaliados pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/699
10.31977/grirfi.v13i1.699
url http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/699
identifier_str_mv 10.31977/grirfi.v13i1.699
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/699/415
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Daniel Verginelli Galantin
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Daniel Verginelli Galantin
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 13 n. 1 (2016); 13-36
2178-1036
reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia
instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron:UFRB
instname_str Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron_str UFRB
institution UFRB
reponame_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
collection Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||griotrevista@gmail.com
_version_ 1754732698944929792