Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulness
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
Texto Completo: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/699 |
Resumo: | After an anylisis of the end of History of madness, we propose an interpretation of Blanchot’s article about it. Our aim is to examine a possible dialogue between them. We defend that the theme which might organize such a dialogue is that of forgetfulness and it’s relation with thought. The guiding question is the possibility of a tought that would march towards an active kind of forgetfulness, which isn’t just the result of memory’s fault. We defend the hypothesis that the blanchotian consideration on forgetfulness might help to understand that of ‘absence of work’ which appears in the end of History of madness ; even though blanchotian thought situated in a space of thought very different from that of Foucault, as the case of it’s concepts, methodology and objects. In the same way, this notion could reverberate more vastly in foucaultian works, even though it won’t be resumed after. We think that such a repercussion concern specially the question of the relation between Foucault’s own researches and the present itself ; and that the dialogue with Blanchot could help to think the critic of the present as an effort to actively forget the present and also oneself. |
id |
UFRB-4_2b0681f44611c3f8a70072859712f4f9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/699 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulnessFoucault e Blanchot: um diálogo possível a partir da ausência de obra e do esquecimentoEsquecimento; Ausência de obra; Crítica; Ética; Política.Fogetfulness ; Worklessness ; Critics ; Ethics ; PoliticsAfter an anylisis of the end of History of madness, we propose an interpretation of Blanchot’s article about it. Our aim is to examine a possible dialogue between them. We defend that the theme which might organize such a dialogue is that of forgetfulness and it’s relation with thought. The guiding question is the possibility of a tought that would march towards an active kind of forgetfulness, which isn’t just the result of memory’s fault. We defend the hypothesis that the blanchotian consideration on forgetfulness might help to understand that of ‘absence of work’ which appears in the end of History of madness ; even though blanchotian thought situated in a space of thought very different from that of Foucault, as the case of it’s concepts, methodology and objects. In the same way, this notion could reverberate more vastly in foucaultian works, even though it won’t be resumed after. We think that such a repercussion concern specially the question of the relation between Foucault’s own researches and the present itself ; and that the dialogue with Blanchot could help to think the critic of the present as an effort to actively forget the present and also oneself.Após uma análise do final de História da loucura, propomos uma leitura do artigo de Blanchot sobre este livro com o objetivo de explorar um diálogo possível entre ambos os autores. Defendemos que o tema de fundo deste diálogo é a relação entre pensamento e esquecimento. A questão que guia este diálogo concerne à possibilidade da construção de um pensamento que caminharia em direção a um tipo de esquecimento ativo e não de uma falta da memória. Defendemos a hipótese de que a reflexão blanchotiana sobre o esquecimento, ainda que situada num espaço de pensamento diferente daquele de Foucault quanto a conceitos, metodologia e objetos, pode ajudar a compreender a noção de ausência de obra, tal como ela aparece ao final de História da loucura. Ademais, também consideramos que tal noção repercute na obra foucaultiana posterior, mesmo que ela não seja literalmente retomada. Defendemos que tal repercussão concerne especialmente à questão da relação entre o trabalho de Foucault e o presente, bem como argumentamos que o diálogo com Blanchot pode ajudar a pensar a ontologia crítica do presente enquanto esforço de esquecimento ativo do presente e de si mesmo.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2016-06-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/69910.31977/grirfi.v13i1.699Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 13 n. 1 (2016); 13-362178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/699/415Copyright (c) 2016 Daniel Verginelli Galantininfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGalantin, Daniel Verginelli2020-06-30T18:16:28Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/699Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:16:28Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulness Foucault e Blanchot: um diálogo possível a partir da ausência de obra e do esquecimento |
title |
Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulness |
spellingShingle |
Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulness Galantin, Daniel Verginelli Esquecimento; Ausência de obra; Crítica; Ética; Política. Fogetfulness ; Worklessness ; Critics ; Ethics ; Politics |
title_short |
Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulness |
title_full |
Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulness |
title_fullStr |
Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulness |
title_full_unstemmed |
Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulness |
title_sort |
Foucault and Blanchot: a possible dialogue through worklessness and forgetfulness |
author |
Galantin, Daniel Verginelli |
author_facet |
Galantin, Daniel Verginelli |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Galantin, Daniel Verginelli |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Esquecimento; Ausência de obra; Crítica; Ética; Política. Fogetfulness ; Worklessness ; Critics ; Ethics ; Politics |
topic |
Esquecimento; Ausência de obra; Crítica; Ética; Política. Fogetfulness ; Worklessness ; Critics ; Ethics ; Politics |
description |
After an anylisis of the end of History of madness, we propose an interpretation of Blanchot’s article about it. Our aim is to examine a possible dialogue between them. We defend that the theme which might organize such a dialogue is that of forgetfulness and it’s relation with thought. The guiding question is the possibility of a tought that would march towards an active kind of forgetfulness, which isn’t just the result of memory’s fault. We defend the hypothesis that the blanchotian consideration on forgetfulness might help to understand that of ‘absence of work’ which appears in the end of History of madness ; even though blanchotian thought situated in a space of thought very different from that of Foucault, as the case of it’s concepts, methodology and objects. In the same way, this notion could reverberate more vastly in foucaultian works, even though it won’t be resumed after. We think that such a repercussion concern specially the question of the relation between Foucault’s own researches and the present itself ; and that the dialogue with Blanchot could help to think the critic of the present as an effort to actively forget the present and also oneself. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/699 10.31977/grirfi.v13i1.699 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/699 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v13i1.699 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/699/415 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Daniel Verginelli Galantin info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Daniel Verginelli Galantin |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 13 n. 1 (2016); 13-36 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754732698944929792 |