The problem of peer disagreement in contemporary epistemology

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marques Silva, Juliomar
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Griot : Revista de Filosofia
Texto Completo: http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2160
Resumo: Recently, contemporary epistemology come systematically discussing the theme of disagreement. In our everyday life, although many cases can be seen as merely apparent disagreements, there are also some cases where disputes are legitimates and the disagreements are real. But, would be possible to occur real disagreements between agents we consider epistemic peers? If that is possible, how can we react to these cases, in others words, what is the correct rational attitude in cases of peer disagreements? These are some of the main questions raised by what we call epistemology of disagreements. The aim of this article is to offer a general vision of this contemporary debate. Firstly, i will to present the problem and demonstrate why the scenario of disagreement - mainly between epistemic peers - would be an important philosophical question. Then, i will to present the main theoretical alternatives that arose on the contemporary epistemology as an answers to this problem. Therefore, the aim of this article is to be explanatory it not search for any original position on this debate.
id UFRB-4_44b99e42f72a08815b2bea4986cb3ef1
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/2160
network_acronym_str UFRB-4
network_name_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository_id_str
spelling The problem of peer disagreement in contemporary epistemologyO problema do desacordo na epistemologia contemporâneaDesacordo; Pares epistêmicos; Epistemologia dos desacordos.Disagreement; Epistemic peers; Epistemology of disagreements.Recently, contemporary epistemology come systematically discussing the theme of disagreement. In our everyday life, although many cases can be seen as merely apparent disagreements, there are also some cases where disputes are legitimates and the disagreements are real. But, would be possible to occur real disagreements between agents we consider epistemic peers? If that is possible, how can we react to these cases, in others words, what is the correct rational attitude in cases of peer disagreements? These are some of the main questions raised by what we call epistemology of disagreements. The aim of this article is to offer a general vision of this contemporary debate. Firstly, i will to present the problem and demonstrate why the scenario of disagreement - mainly between epistemic peers - would be an important philosophical question. Then, i will to present the main theoretical alternatives that arose on the contemporary epistemology as an answers to this problem. Therefore, the aim of this article is to be explanatory it not search for any original position on this debate.Recentemente, a epistemologia contemporânea vem discutindo sistematicamente o tema do desacordo. Em nosso dia a dia, embora muitos casos possam ser vistos como desacordos meramente aparentes, existem também os casos em que as disputas são legítimas e os desacordos são reais. Mas, seria possível haver desacordos reais entre agentes considerados pares epistêmicos? Se isso é possível, como deveríamos reagir a esses casos, em outras palavras, qual seria a atitude racional correta em casos de desacordos entre pares? Essas são algumas das principais questões levantadas pela chamada epistemologia dos desacordos. A proposta deste artigo é oferecer um panorama geral desse debate contemporâneo. Primeiramente, busco apresentar o problema e procuro demonstrar porque o cenário dos desacordos – principalmente entre pares epistêmicos – se torna uma importante questão filosófica. Em seguida, irei apresentar as principais alternativas teóricas que surgiram na epistemologia contemporânea como respostas a esse problema. Desta forma, o objetivo deste artigo é ser mais explanatório e não busca por nenhuma posição de originalidade nesse debate.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2021-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/216010.31977/grirfi.v21i1.2160Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 21 n. 1 (2021); 206-2202178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2160/1229Copyright (c) 2021 Juliomar Marques Silvahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarques Silva, Juliomar2021-06-02T12:21:07Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/2160Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2021-06-02T12:21:07Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The problem of peer disagreement in contemporary epistemology
O problema do desacordo na epistemologia contemporânea
title The problem of peer disagreement in contemporary epistemology
spellingShingle The problem of peer disagreement in contemporary epistemology
Marques Silva, Juliomar
Desacordo; Pares epistêmicos; Epistemologia dos desacordos.
Disagreement; Epistemic peers; Epistemology of disagreements.
title_short The problem of peer disagreement in contemporary epistemology
title_full The problem of peer disagreement in contemporary epistemology
title_fullStr The problem of peer disagreement in contemporary epistemology
title_full_unstemmed The problem of peer disagreement in contemporary epistemology
title_sort The problem of peer disagreement in contemporary epistemology
author Marques Silva, Juliomar
author_facet Marques Silva, Juliomar
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marques Silva, Juliomar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Desacordo; Pares epistêmicos; Epistemologia dos desacordos.
Disagreement; Epistemic peers; Epistemology of disagreements.
topic Desacordo; Pares epistêmicos; Epistemologia dos desacordos.
Disagreement; Epistemic peers; Epistemology of disagreements.
description Recently, contemporary epistemology come systematically discussing the theme of disagreement. In our everyday life, although many cases can be seen as merely apparent disagreements, there are also some cases where disputes are legitimates and the disagreements are real. But, would be possible to occur real disagreements between agents we consider epistemic peers? If that is possible, how can we react to these cases, in others words, what is the correct rational attitude in cases of peer disagreements? These are some of the main questions raised by what we call epistemology of disagreements. The aim of this article is to offer a general vision of this contemporary debate. Firstly, i will to present the problem and demonstrate why the scenario of disagreement - mainly between epistemic peers - would be an important philosophical question. Then, i will to present the main theoretical alternatives that arose on the contemporary epistemology as an answers to this problem. Therefore, the aim of this article is to be explanatory it not search for any original position on this debate.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-Reviewed
Evaluados por los pares
Avaliados pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2160
10.31977/grirfi.v21i1.2160
url http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2160
identifier_str_mv 10.31977/grirfi.v21i1.2160
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/2160/1229
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Juliomar Marques Silva
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Juliomar Marques Silva
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 21 n. 1 (2021); 206-220
2178-1036
reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia
instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron:UFRB
instname_str Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron_str UFRB
institution UFRB
reponame_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
collection Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||griotrevista@gmail.com
_version_ 1754732700372041728

Registros relacionados