The aesthetics of extremes: notes on the relationship between rock art and technical reproducibility in Theodor Adorno

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Jéverton Soares dos
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Almeida, Robson da Rosa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Griot : Revista de Filosofia
Texto Completo: http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/704
Resumo: The article proposes a connection between two different fields of research, but with notorious elective affinities: the field of archeology and the philosophical aesthetics. It is intended to find, within the dialectic of Adorno, how articulate the concepts of prehistory and proto-history, it having as a guide the theme of rock art and its modern counterpart, the reproducibility technique. Such an approach takes as its starting point an intriguing paragraph of posthumous Adorno’s work, "Ästhetische Theorie," this subsection thus classified by Rolf Tiedmann as "Moderne Kunst und Industrielle Produktion" in which Adorno asserts that there is a convergence between the rock art and photographic camera, that occurred in objectification (Objektivation), e.g., in the action to separate the subjective act of the object that is seen . From this finding the greatest contribution of this paper was to identify a kind of mechanical reproduction proto-history in the prehistoric world. Thus, in a radically dialectical perspective it can be said that the virtual progress and technological sense in recent decades does not represent something qualitatively new in human history, being only an offshoot of a trend already contained in prehistory, which leads us to believe we have not yet overcome the state of mythical immanence widely denounced by Adorno and Horkheimer's "Dialectic of Enlightment. To demonstrate that this article aims to reconstruct the main thrust of the "Dialectic of Enlightenment", focusing on the myth category (Section 1). After it intends to present the relationship between prehistory and proto-history in the context of Adorno's thought, especially in the construction and essays of intermediate period of his thought, such as "Minima Moralia" and "Prismen" (Section 2). Finally, it wants to present some Adorno's reflections on rock art and mechanical reproduction present in Aesthetic Theory (Section 3).
id UFRB-4_5f5101fabd394e218c7dd1766cfadb2c
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/704
network_acronym_str UFRB-4
network_name_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository_id_str
spelling The aesthetics of extremes: notes on the relationship between rock art and technical reproducibility in Theodor AdornoA estética dos extremos: notas sobre a relação entre a arte rupestre e a reprodutibilidade técnica em Theodor AdornoReprodutibilidade Técnica; Arte Rupestre; Imanência Mítica.Technical reproducibility; Rock art; Mythical immanenceThe article proposes a connection between two different fields of research, but with notorious elective affinities: the field of archeology and the philosophical aesthetics. It is intended to find, within the dialectic of Adorno, how articulate the concepts of prehistory and proto-history, it having as a guide the theme of rock art and its modern counterpart, the reproducibility technique. Such an approach takes as its starting point an intriguing paragraph of posthumous Adorno’s work, "Ästhetische Theorie," this subsection thus classified by Rolf Tiedmann as "Moderne Kunst und Industrielle Produktion" in which Adorno asserts that there is a convergence between the rock art and photographic camera, that occurred in objectification (Objektivation), e.g., in the action to separate the subjective act of the object that is seen . From this finding the greatest contribution of this paper was to identify a kind of mechanical reproduction proto-history in the prehistoric world. Thus, in a radically dialectical perspective it can be said that the virtual progress and technological sense in recent decades does not represent something qualitatively new in human history, being only an offshoot of a trend already contained in prehistory, which leads us to believe we have not yet overcome the state of mythical immanence widely denounced by Adorno and Horkheimer's "Dialectic of Enlightment. To demonstrate that this article aims to reconstruct the main thrust of the "Dialectic of Enlightenment", focusing on the myth category (Section 1). After it intends to present the relationship between prehistory and proto-history in the context of Adorno's thought, especially in the construction and essays of intermediate period of his thought, such as "Minima Moralia" and "Prismen" (Section 2). Finally, it wants to present some Adorno's reflections on rock art and mechanical reproduction present in Aesthetic Theory (Section 3).O artigo propõe uma aproximação entre dois campos de pesquisa distintos, mas com notórias afinidades eletivas: o campo da arqueologia e o da estética filosófica. Pretende-se saber de que modo, no interior do pensamento dialético de Adorno, articulam-se os conceitos de pré-história e proto-história, tendo como fio condutor a temática da arte rupestre e a sua contrapartida moderna, isto é, a reprodutibilidade técnica. Tal aproximação tem como ponto de partida um instigante parágrafo da obra póstuma de Adorno, “Ästhetische Theorie”, presente na subseção assim classificada por Rolf Tiedmann como "Moderne Kunst und Industrielle Produktion", no qual Adorno afirma que há uma convergência entre a arte rupestre e a câmera fotográfica, que se daria na objetivação (Objektivation), isto é, na ação de separar o ato subjetivo do objeto que é visto. A partir desta constatação, a contribuição maior deste artigo estaria em identificar uma espécie de proto-história da reprodutibilidade técnica no mundo pré-histórico. Deste modo, numa perspectiva radicalmente dialética pode-se dizer que o progresso virtual e tecnológico sentido nas últimas décadas não representa algo qualitativamente novo na história humana, sendo apenas um desdobramento de uma tendência já contida na pré-história, algo que nos leva a crer que não conseguimos ainda superar o estado de imanência mítica denunciado amplamente por Adorno e Horkheimer na “Dialektik der Aufklärung. Para demonstrar isto o presente artigo almeja reconstruir as principais linhas de força da "Dialética do Esclarecimento", centrando na categoria de mito (Seção 1). Após, pretende apresentar a relação entre pré-história e proto-história no contexto do pensamento adorniano, especialmente nas obras e nos ensaios do período intermediário de sua bibliografia, tais como “Minima Moralia” e “Prismen” (Seção 2). Por último, deseja apresentar algumas reflexões de Adorno sobre a arte rupestre e a reprodutibilidade técnica presentes na Teoria Estética (Seção 3).Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2016-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/70410.31977/grirfi.v14i2.704Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 14 n. 2 (2016); 427-4522178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/704/420Copyright (c) 2016 Jéverton Soares dos Santos, Robson da Rosa Almeidainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos, Jéverton Soares dosAlmeida, Robson da Rosa2020-06-30T18:16:24Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/704Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:16:24Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The aesthetics of extremes: notes on the relationship between rock art and technical reproducibility in Theodor Adorno
A estética dos extremos: notas sobre a relação entre a arte rupestre e a reprodutibilidade técnica em Theodor Adorno
title The aesthetics of extremes: notes on the relationship between rock art and technical reproducibility in Theodor Adorno
spellingShingle The aesthetics of extremes: notes on the relationship between rock art and technical reproducibility in Theodor Adorno
Santos, Jéverton Soares dos
Reprodutibilidade Técnica; Arte Rupestre; Imanência Mítica.
Technical reproducibility; Rock art; Mythical immanence
title_short The aesthetics of extremes: notes on the relationship between rock art and technical reproducibility in Theodor Adorno
title_full The aesthetics of extremes: notes on the relationship between rock art and technical reproducibility in Theodor Adorno
title_fullStr The aesthetics of extremes: notes on the relationship between rock art and technical reproducibility in Theodor Adorno
title_full_unstemmed The aesthetics of extremes: notes on the relationship between rock art and technical reproducibility in Theodor Adorno
title_sort The aesthetics of extremes: notes on the relationship between rock art and technical reproducibility in Theodor Adorno
author Santos, Jéverton Soares dos
author_facet Santos, Jéverton Soares dos
Almeida, Robson da Rosa
author_role author
author2 Almeida, Robson da Rosa
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Jéverton Soares dos
Almeida, Robson da Rosa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Reprodutibilidade Técnica; Arte Rupestre; Imanência Mítica.
Technical reproducibility; Rock art; Mythical immanence
topic Reprodutibilidade Técnica; Arte Rupestre; Imanência Mítica.
Technical reproducibility; Rock art; Mythical immanence
description The article proposes a connection between two different fields of research, but with notorious elective affinities: the field of archeology and the philosophical aesthetics. It is intended to find, within the dialectic of Adorno, how articulate the concepts of prehistory and proto-history, it having as a guide the theme of rock art and its modern counterpart, the reproducibility technique. Such an approach takes as its starting point an intriguing paragraph of posthumous Adorno’s work, "Ästhetische Theorie," this subsection thus classified by Rolf Tiedmann as "Moderne Kunst und Industrielle Produktion" in which Adorno asserts that there is a convergence between the rock art and photographic camera, that occurred in objectification (Objektivation), e.g., in the action to separate the subjective act of the object that is seen . From this finding the greatest contribution of this paper was to identify a kind of mechanical reproduction proto-history in the prehistoric world. Thus, in a radically dialectical perspective it can be said that the virtual progress and technological sense in recent decades does not represent something qualitatively new in human history, being only an offshoot of a trend already contained in prehistory, which leads us to believe we have not yet overcome the state of mythical immanence widely denounced by Adorno and Horkheimer's "Dialectic of Enlightment. To demonstrate that this article aims to reconstruct the main thrust of the "Dialectic of Enlightenment", focusing on the myth category (Section 1). After it intends to present the relationship between prehistory and proto-history in the context of Adorno's thought, especially in the construction and essays of intermediate period of his thought, such as "Minima Moralia" and "Prismen" (Section 2). Finally, it wants to present some Adorno's reflections on rock art and mechanical reproduction present in Aesthetic Theory (Section 3).
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-Reviewed
Evaluados por los pares
Avaliados pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/704
10.31977/grirfi.v14i2.704
url http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/704
identifier_str_mv 10.31977/grirfi.v14i2.704
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/704/420
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Jéverton Soares dos Santos, Robson da Rosa Almeida
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Jéverton Soares dos Santos, Robson da Rosa Almeida
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 14 n. 2 (2016); 427-452
2178-1036
reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia
instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron:UFRB
instname_str Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron_str UFRB
institution UFRB
reponame_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
collection Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||griotrevista@gmail.com
_version_ 1754732698951221248