Ferdinand Alquié against the Spinoza’s monism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
Texto Completo: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/972 |
Resumo: | This paper aims to present Ferdinand Alquié's rejection of Spinoza's monism. Unlike Descartes, who sustains dualism, the monist thesis determines that there can be only one substance constituted by infinite attributes. This thesis is fundamental for the consolidation of the entire philosophical system of Spinoza. Alquié concludes that the monist thesis is incompatible with the argumentative structure of the first book of the Ethics. Alquié's approach is important because it exposes the problem very clearly, which justifies the presentation of his thinking, that can be useful to those who are interested in the studies of Spinoza's philosophy. |
id |
UFRB-4_6d5332cae4a929eaf4853ae39b10318d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/972 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ferdinand Alquié against the Spinoza’s monismFerdinand Alquié contra o monismo de EspinosaEspinosa; Alquié; Monismo; Substância; Atributo.Spinoza; Alquié; Monism; Substance; Attribute.This paper aims to present Ferdinand Alquié's rejection of Spinoza's monism. Unlike Descartes, who sustains dualism, the monist thesis determines that there can be only one substance constituted by infinite attributes. This thesis is fundamental for the consolidation of the entire philosophical system of Spinoza. Alquié concludes that the monist thesis is incompatible with the argumentative structure of the first book of the Ethics. Alquié's approach is important because it exposes the problem very clearly, which justifies the presentation of his thinking, that can be useful to those who are interested in the studies of Spinoza's philosophy.Este artigo tem como objetivo apresentar a rejeição de Ferdinand Alquié à tese do monismo de Espinosa. Diferentemente de Descartes, que sustenta o dualismo, a tese do monismo determina que só pode existir uma única substância constituída de infinitos atributos. Esta tese é fundamental para a consolidação de todo o sistema filosófico de Espinosa. Alquié conclui que a tese do monismo é incompatível com a estrutura argumentativa do primeiro livro da Ética. A abordagem de Alquié é importante porque expõe o problema de maneira muito clara, razão pela qual a apresentação de seu pensamento pode ser útil àqueles que se interessam pelos estudos da filosofia de Espinosa.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2018-12-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/97210.31977/grirfi.v18i2.972Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 18 n. 2 (2018); 72-852178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/972/578Copyright (c) 2018 Marcio Francisco Teixeira de Oliveirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Marcio Francisco Teixeira de2020-06-30T18:14:28Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/972Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:14:28Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ferdinand Alquié against the Spinoza’s monism Ferdinand Alquié contra o monismo de Espinosa |
title |
Ferdinand Alquié against the Spinoza’s monism |
spellingShingle |
Ferdinand Alquié against the Spinoza’s monism Oliveira, Marcio Francisco Teixeira de Espinosa; Alquié; Monismo; Substância; Atributo. Spinoza; Alquié; Monism; Substance; Attribute. |
title_short |
Ferdinand Alquié against the Spinoza’s monism |
title_full |
Ferdinand Alquié against the Spinoza’s monism |
title_fullStr |
Ferdinand Alquié against the Spinoza’s monism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ferdinand Alquié against the Spinoza’s monism |
title_sort |
Ferdinand Alquié against the Spinoza’s monism |
author |
Oliveira, Marcio Francisco Teixeira de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Marcio Francisco Teixeira de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Marcio Francisco Teixeira de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Espinosa; Alquié; Monismo; Substância; Atributo. Spinoza; Alquié; Monism; Substance; Attribute. |
topic |
Espinosa; Alquié; Monismo; Substância; Atributo. Spinoza; Alquié; Monism; Substance; Attribute. |
description |
This paper aims to present Ferdinand Alquié's rejection of Spinoza's monism. Unlike Descartes, who sustains dualism, the monist thesis determines that there can be only one substance constituted by infinite attributes. This thesis is fundamental for the consolidation of the entire philosophical system of Spinoza. Alquié concludes that the monist thesis is incompatible with the argumentative structure of the first book of the Ethics. Alquié's approach is important because it exposes the problem very clearly, which justifies the presentation of his thinking, that can be useful to those who are interested in the studies of Spinoza's philosophy. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/972 10.31977/grirfi.v18i2.972 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/972 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v18i2.972 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/972/578 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Marcio Francisco Teixeira de Oliveira info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Marcio Francisco Teixeira de Oliveira |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 18 n. 2 (2018); 72-85 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754732699532132352 |