“Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
Texto Completo: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/3017 |
Resumo: | This paper propose a reading and application of the homo sacer metaphysical concept, central to the Giorgio Agamben In his text Why Look at Animals? John Berger comments on how the animal metaphor was an indispensable resource for revealing a closeness between species, and that without the example of animals it would be unlikely, for example, to describe events such as those narrated by Homer in The Iliad. The correlation between similar and heterogeneous lives allowed human beings, inspired by animals, to provide answers to the first questions. It is reasonable to say that the first metaphor was that of the animal, as a way of sharing the world that was both common and different to them. But our relationship with non-human animals also contains contradictions; the creation of the zoo represented the raising of a monument to the impossibility of any reunion with animality. Instead of being liberated, animals were captured by other political categories. For John Berger the ambiguities remain "They are the objects of our ever-increasing knowledge. What we know about them is an index of our power, and so is an index of what separates us from them. The more we know, the more distant they become." |
id |
UFRB-4_6e0b44fa7fb0f701b5096031191d5165 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/3017 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
“Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger“Por quê olhar os animais?” Ética da alteridade e animalidade em John BergerAnimal ethics; Metaphor; Otherness; Confinement.Ética animal; Metáfora; Alteridade; Confinamento.This paper propose a reading and application of the homo sacer metaphysical concept, central to the Giorgio Agamben In his text Why Look at Animals? John Berger comments on how the animal metaphor was an indispensable resource for revealing a closeness between species, and that without the example of animals it would be unlikely, for example, to describe events such as those narrated by Homer in The Iliad. The correlation between similar and heterogeneous lives allowed human beings, inspired by animals, to provide answers to the first questions. It is reasonable to say that the first metaphor was that of the animal, as a way of sharing the world that was both common and different to them. But our relationship with non-human animals also contains contradictions; the creation of the zoo represented the raising of a monument to the impossibility of any reunion with animality. Instead of being liberated, animals were captured by other political categories. For John Berger the ambiguities remain "They are the objects of our ever-increasing knowledge. What we know about them is an index of our power, and so is an index of what separates us from them. The more we know, the more distant they become." Em seu texto Por quê olhar os animais?, John Berger comenta como a metáfora animal foi um recurso indispensável para revelar uma proximidade entre as espécies, e que sem o exemplo de animais seria improvável, por exemplo, descrever eventos como aqueles narrados por Homero n’A Iíada. A correlação entre vidas semelhantes e heterogêneas permitiram aos seres humanos, inspirados pelos animais, darem respostas às primeiras perguntas. É razoável afirmar que a primeira metáfora tenha sido a do animal, como um modo de partilhar o mundo que lhes era comum e diferente. Mas nossa relação com os animais não-humanos também contém contradições; a criação do zoológico representou a elevação de um monumento à impossibilidade de qualquer reencontro com a animalidade. Em vez de liberados, os animais foram capturados por outras categorias políticas. Para John Berger as ambiguidades permanecem “Eles são os objetos de nosso conhecimento sempre crescente. O que sabemos sobre eles é um índice de nosso poder, e assim é um índice do que nos separa deles. Quanto mais sabemos, mais distante eles ficam.” Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2022-10-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/301710.31977/grirfi.v22i3.3017Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 3 (2022); 183-1942178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/3017/1792Copyright (c) 2022 Mateus Uchôahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUchôa, Mateus2022-10-28T21:38:07Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/3017Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2022-10-28T21:38:07Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
“Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger “Por quê olhar os animais?” Ética da alteridade e animalidade em John Berger |
title |
“Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger |
spellingShingle |
“Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger Uchôa, Mateus Animal ethics; Metaphor; Otherness; Confinement. Ética animal; Metáfora; Alteridade; Confinamento. |
title_short |
“Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger |
title_full |
“Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger |
title_fullStr |
“Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger |
title_full_unstemmed |
“Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger |
title_sort |
“Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger |
author |
Uchôa, Mateus |
author_facet |
Uchôa, Mateus |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Uchôa, Mateus |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Animal ethics; Metaphor; Otherness; Confinement. Ética animal; Metáfora; Alteridade; Confinamento. |
topic |
Animal ethics; Metaphor; Otherness; Confinement. Ética animal; Metáfora; Alteridade; Confinamento. |
description |
This paper propose a reading and application of the homo sacer metaphysical concept, central to the Giorgio Agamben In his text Why Look at Animals? John Berger comments on how the animal metaphor was an indispensable resource for revealing a closeness between species, and that without the example of animals it would be unlikely, for example, to describe events such as those narrated by Homer in The Iliad. The correlation between similar and heterogeneous lives allowed human beings, inspired by animals, to provide answers to the first questions. It is reasonable to say that the first metaphor was that of the animal, as a way of sharing the world that was both common and different to them. But our relationship with non-human animals also contains contradictions; the creation of the zoo represented the raising of a monument to the impossibility of any reunion with animality. Instead of being liberated, animals were captured by other political categories. For John Berger the ambiguities remain "They are the objects of our ever-increasing knowledge. What we know about them is an index of our power, and so is an index of what separates us from them. The more we know, the more distant they become." |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/3017 10.31977/grirfi.v22i3.3017 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/3017 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v22i3.3017 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/3017/1792 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Mateus Uchôa http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Mateus Uchôa http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 3 (2022); 183-194 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754732700761063424 |