“Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Uchôa, Mateus
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Griot : Revista de Filosofia
Texto Completo: http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/3017
Resumo: This paper propose a reading and application of the homo sacer metaphysical concept, central to the Giorgio Agamben In his text Why Look at Animals? John Berger comments on how the animal metaphor was an indispensable resource for revealing a closeness between species, and that without the example of animals it would be unlikely, for example, to describe events such as those narrated by Homer in The Iliad. The correlation between similar and heterogeneous lives allowed human beings, inspired by animals, to provide answers to the first questions. It is reasonable to say that the first metaphor was that of the animal, as a way of sharing the world that was both common and different to them. But our relationship with non-human animals also contains contradictions; the creation of the zoo represented the raising of a monument to the impossibility of any reunion with animality. Instead of being liberated, animals were captured by other political categories. For John Berger the ambiguities remain "They are the objects of our ever-increasing knowledge. What we know about them is an index of our power, and so is an index of what separates us from them. The more we know, the more distant they become."  
id UFRB-4_6e0b44fa7fb0f701b5096031191d5165
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/3017
network_acronym_str UFRB-4
network_name_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository_id_str
spelling “Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger“Por quê olhar os animais?” Ética da alteridade e animalidade em John BergerAnimal ethics; Metaphor; Otherness; Confinement.Ética animal; Metáfora; Alteridade; Confinamento.This paper propose a reading and application of the homo sacer metaphysical concept, central to the Giorgio Agamben In his text Why Look at Animals? John Berger comments on how the animal metaphor was an indispensable resource for revealing a closeness between species, and that without the example of animals it would be unlikely, for example, to describe events such as those narrated by Homer in The Iliad. The correlation between similar and heterogeneous lives allowed human beings, inspired by animals, to provide answers to the first questions. It is reasonable to say that the first metaphor was that of the animal, as a way of sharing the world that was both common and different to them. But our relationship with non-human animals also contains contradictions; the creation of the zoo represented the raising of a monument to the impossibility of any reunion with animality. Instead of being liberated, animals were captured by other political categories. For John Berger the ambiguities remain "They are the objects of our ever-increasing knowledge. What we know about them is an index of our power, and so is an index of what separates us from them. The more we know, the more distant they become."  Em seu texto Por quê olhar os animais?, John Berger comenta como a metáfora animal foi um recurso indispensável para revelar uma proximidade entre as espécies, e que sem o exemplo de animais seria improvável, por exemplo, descrever eventos como aqueles narrados por Homero n’A Iíada. A correlação entre vidas semelhantes e heterogêneas permitiram aos seres humanos, inspirados pelos animais, darem respostas às primeiras perguntas. É razoável afirmar que a primeira metáfora tenha sido a do animal, como um modo de partilhar o mundo que lhes era comum e diferente. Mas nossa relação com os animais não-humanos também contém contradições; a criação do zoológico representou a elevação de um monumento à impossibilidade  de qualquer reencontro com  a animalidade. Em vez de liberados, os animais foram capturados por outras categorias políticas. Para John Berger as ambiguidades permanecem “Eles são os objetos de nosso conhecimento sempre crescente. O que sabemos sobre eles é um índice de nosso poder, e assim é um índice do que nos separa deles. Quanto mais sabemos, mais distante eles ficam.”  Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2022-10-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/301710.31977/grirfi.v22i3.3017Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 3 (2022); 183-1942178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/3017/1792Copyright (c) 2022 Mateus Uchôahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUchôa, Mateus2022-10-28T21:38:07Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/3017Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2022-10-28T21:38:07Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv “Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger
“Por quê olhar os animais?” Ética da alteridade e animalidade em John Berger
title “Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger
spellingShingle “Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger
Uchôa, Mateus
Animal ethics; Metaphor; Otherness; Confinement.
Ética animal; Metáfora; Alteridade; Confinamento.
title_short “Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger
title_full “Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger
title_fullStr “Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger
title_full_unstemmed “Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger
title_sort “Why look at animals?” Ethic of otherness and animality in John Berger
author Uchôa, Mateus
author_facet Uchôa, Mateus
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Uchôa, Mateus
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Animal ethics; Metaphor; Otherness; Confinement.
Ética animal; Metáfora; Alteridade; Confinamento.
topic Animal ethics; Metaphor; Otherness; Confinement.
Ética animal; Metáfora; Alteridade; Confinamento.
description This paper propose a reading and application of the homo sacer metaphysical concept, central to the Giorgio Agamben In his text Why Look at Animals? John Berger comments on how the animal metaphor was an indispensable resource for revealing a closeness between species, and that without the example of animals it would be unlikely, for example, to describe events such as those narrated by Homer in The Iliad. The correlation between similar and heterogeneous lives allowed human beings, inspired by animals, to provide answers to the first questions. It is reasonable to say that the first metaphor was that of the animal, as a way of sharing the world that was both common and different to them. But our relationship with non-human animals also contains contradictions; the creation of the zoo represented the raising of a monument to the impossibility of any reunion with animality. Instead of being liberated, animals were captured by other political categories. For John Berger the ambiguities remain "They are the objects of our ever-increasing knowledge. What we know about them is an index of our power, and so is an index of what separates us from them. The more we know, the more distant they become."  
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-Reviewed
Evaluados por los pares
Avaliados pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/3017
10.31977/grirfi.v22i3.3017
url http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/3017
identifier_str_mv 10.31977/grirfi.v22i3.3017
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/3017/1792
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Mateus Uchôa
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Mateus Uchôa
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 22 n. 3 (2022); 183-194
2178-1036
reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia
instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron:UFRB
instname_str Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
instacron_str UFRB
institution UFRB
reponame_str Griot : Revista de Filosofia
collection Griot : Revista de Filosofia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||griotrevista@gmail.com
_version_ 1754732700761063424