Resentment and revenge: conservation and breakdown of the political space in Arendt
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
Texto Completo: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1756 |
Resumo: | The public space is the stage for the most varied conflicts, resulting, in certain cases, in violence. However, it is in this space that men experience freedom, expressing themselves in front of plurality of opinions. As it is a space for free expression, our actions and opinions are not always received without contradiction, arousing resentful feelings. Following Arendt's thinking, the public space is the arena in which everyone should manifest themselves spontaneously, showing themselves from their uniqueness before the plurality that characterizes the community. As it is a space for the expression of the individual, guided by freedom and plurality, the individual’s action is irreversible and unpredictable, enabling a cycle of misunderstandings and violence. Consequently, there is no way to prevent conflicting emotions from being fed by the damage originated from political action. According to Arendt, resentments are emotional states peculiar to human beings, facilitating common understanding and coexistence. Thus, resentment can lead to acts against injustice, with punishment and forgiveness, enabling a new beginning. However, there are acts that are not in keeping with forgiveness, such as the crimes perpetrated by Nazism, whose relationship established among men was not human. In the face of the absurdity of the situation, on which there is no way to judge, forgiveness has no place, closing the doors to a new beginning. Anyway, this text intends to explore the role of resentment as a factor that enables the survival of public space, but that can also lead to its destruction. |
id |
UFRB-4_78945c2eca4350eb72220ee62b53719f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/1756 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Resentment and revenge: conservation and breakdown of the political space in ArendtRessentimento e vingança: conservação e desagregação do espaço político em ArendtEspaço público; Hannah Arendt; Política; Perdão; Promessa; Ressentimento.Publicspace; Hannah Arendt; Politics; Forgiveness; Promise; Resentment.The public space is the stage for the most varied conflicts, resulting, in certain cases, in violence. However, it is in this space that men experience freedom, expressing themselves in front of plurality of opinions. As it is a space for free expression, our actions and opinions are not always received without contradiction, arousing resentful feelings. Following Arendt's thinking, the public space is the arena in which everyone should manifest themselves spontaneously, showing themselves from their uniqueness before the plurality that characterizes the community. As it is a space for the expression of the individual, guided by freedom and plurality, the individual’s action is irreversible and unpredictable, enabling a cycle of misunderstandings and violence. Consequently, there is no way to prevent conflicting emotions from being fed by the damage originated from political action. According to Arendt, resentments are emotional states peculiar to human beings, facilitating common understanding and coexistence. Thus, resentment can lead to acts against injustice, with punishment and forgiveness, enabling a new beginning. However, there are acts that are not in keeping with forgiveness, such as the crimes perpetrated by Nazism, whose relationship established among men was not human. In the face of the absurdity of the situation, on which there is no way to judge, forgiveness has no place, closing the doors to a new beginning. Anyway, this text intends to explore the role of resentment as a factor that enables the survival of public space, but that can also lead to its destruction. O espaço público é palco para os mais variados conflitos, resultando, em certos casos, em violência. Entretanto, é nesse espaço que os homens experimentam a liberdade, expressando-se frente à pluralidade de opiniões. Por ser um espaço para a livre expressão, nem sempre nossas ações e opiniões são recebidas sem contrariedade, despertando sentimentos rancorosos. Seguindo o pensamento de Arendt, o espaço público é a arena em que todos devem se manifestar espontaneamente, evidenciando-se a partir de sua singularidade diante da pluralidade que caracteriza a comunidade. Por ser um espaço de manifestação do indivíduo, pautado pela liberdade e pluralidade, a ação é irreversível e imprevisível, possibilitando um ciclo de mal-entendidos e violência. Por conseguinte, não há como impedir que emoções conflitantes sejam alimentadas do prejuízo originado da ação política. Segundo Arendt, ressentimentos são estados emocionais peculiares ao ser humano, facilitando o entendimento comum e a convivência. Assim, o ressentimento pode conduzir a atos contra a injustiça, com a punição e o perdão, possibilitando um novo começo. Contudo, há atos que não se coadunam com o perdão, como os crimes perpetrados pelo nazismo, cuja relação estabelecida entre os homens não era humana. Diante do absurdo da situação, sobre a qual não há como julgar, o perdão não tem lugar, fechando as portas para um novo começo. Enfim, este texto pretende explorar o papel do ressentimento enquanto fator que possibilita a sobrevivência do espaço público, mas que também pode conduzir à sua destruição. Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2020-06-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/175610.31977/grirfi.v20i2.1756Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 2 (2020); 360-3792178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1756/1055Copyright (c) 2020 Ricardo Gião Bortolottihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBortolotti, Ricardo Gião2020-08-17T22:29:29Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/1756Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-08-17T22:29:29Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Resentment and revenge: conservation and breakdown of the political space in Arendt Ressentimento e vingança: conservação e desagregação do espaço político em Arendt |
title |
Resentment and revenge: conservation and breakdown of the political space in Arendt |
spellingShingle |
Resentment and revenge: conservation and breakdown of the political space in Arendt Bortolotti, Ricardo Gião Espaço público; Hannah Arendt; Política; Perdão; Promessa; Ressentimento. Publicspace; Hannah Arendt; Politics; Forgiveness; Promise; Resentment. |
title_short |
Resentment and revenge: conservation and breakdown of the political space in Arendt |
title_full |
Resentment and revenge: conservation and breakdown of the political space in Arendt |
title_fullStr |
Resentment and revenge: conservation and breakdown of the political space in Arendt |
title_full_unstemmed |
Resentment and revenge: conservation and breakdown of the political space in Arendt |
title_sort |
Resentment and revenge: conservation and breakdown of the political space in Arendt |
author |
Bortolotti, Ricardo Gião |
author_facet |
Bortolotti, Ricardo Gião |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bortolotti, Ricardo Gião |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Espaço público; Hannah Arendt; Política; Perdão; Promessa; Ressentimento. Publicspace; Hannah Arendt; Politics; Forgiveness; Promise; Resentment. |
topic |
Espaço público; Hannah Arendt; Política; Perdão; Promessa; Ressentimento. Publicspace; Hannah Arendt; Politics; Forgiveness; Promise; Resentment. |
description |
The public space is the stage for the most varied conflicts, resulting, in certain cases, in violence. However, it is in this space that men experience freedom, expressing themselves in front of plurality of opinions. As it is a space for free expression, our actions and opinions are not always received without contradiction, arousing resentful feelings. Following Arendt's thinking, the public space is the arena in which everyone should manifest themselves spontaneously, showing themselves from their uniqueness before the plurality that characterizes the community. As it is a space for the expression of the individual, guided by freedom and plurality, the individual’s action is irreversible and unpredictable, enabling a cycle of misunderstandings and violence. Consequently, there is no way to prevent conflicting emotions from being fed by the damage originated from political action. According to Arendt, resentments are emotional states peculiar to human beings, facilitating common understanding and coexistence. Thus, resentment can lead to acts against injustice, with punishment and forgiveness, enabling a new beginning. However, there are acts that are not in keeping with forgiveness, such as the crimes perpetrated by Nazism, whose relationship established among men was not human. In the face of the absurdity of the situation, on which there is no way to judge, forgiveness has no place, closing the doors to a new beginning. Anyway, this text intends to explore the role of resentment as a factor that enables the survival of public space, but that can also lead to its destruction. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1756 10.31977/grirfi.v20i2.1756 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1756 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v20i2.1756 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/1756/1055 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Ricardo Gião Bortolotti http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Ricardo Gião Bortolotti http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 2 (2020); 360-379 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754732700003991552 |