Rousseau and the paradox of censorship
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
Texto Completo: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/978 |
Resumo: | This article aims to analyze the apparent contradiction between the institution of censorship in the Social Contract of Rousseau and the censorship he suffered in Geneva and Paris. With this aim, we will analyze the concept of censorship in the Social Contract and the Rousseau’s arguments in the works: Letters of the Mountain and the Letter to Christophe Beaumont, supported in the work of some experts on Rousseau's political work. Our studies allow us to conclude Jean-Jacques Rousseau does in fact, admit the possibility of censorship; however, the action of the censors must be restricted by public opinion, just like the prince’s actions by the laws. In addition, if there is a similar process it should meet all the requirements of the civil law of the State where censorship takes place. Both in Paris and in Geneva Rousseau disagrees with the way they dealt with him and his works. |
id |
UFRB-4_b309ee1380b03fb32c10ec9248fc3448 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/978 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Rousseau and the paradox of censorshipRousseau e o paradoxo da censuraCensura; Filosofia; Política; Religião; Rousseau.Censorship; Philosophy; Politics; Religion; Rousseau.This article aims to analyze the apparent contradiction between the institution of censorship in the Social Contract of Rousseau and the censorship he suffered in Geneva and Paris. With this aim, we will analyze the concept of censorship in the Social Contract and the Rousseau’s arguments in the works: Letters of the Mountain and the Letter to Christophe Beaumont, supported in the work of some experts on Rousseau's political work. Our studies allow us to conclude Jean-Jacques Rousseau does in fact, admit the possibility of censorship; however, the action of the censors must be restricted by public opinion, just like the prince’s actions by the laws. In addition, if there is a similar process it should meet all the requirements of the civil law of the State where censorship takes place. Both in Paris and in Geneva Rousseau disagrees with the way they dealt with him and his works.Este artigo tem por objetivo analisar a aparente contradição entre a instituição da censura no Contrato Social de Rousseau e a censura que sofreu em Genebra e Paris. Para tanto analisaremos o conceito de censura no Contrato Social e os argumentos utilizados por Rousseau nas obras Cartas escritas da Montanha e a Carta à Christophe Beaumont, com apoio na obra de alguns comentadores da obra política de Rousseau. Nossos estudos nos levam a concluir que Jean-Jacques Rousseau admite, de fato, a possibilidade da instituição da censura, no entanto, a ação dos censores deve ser restrita pela opinião pública, tal como a do príncipe em relação às leis. Além disso, se há um processo semelhante deveria atender todos os requisitos da legislação civil do Estado no qual ocorre. Tanto em Paris, como em Genebra Rousseau discorda do modo como procederam em relação às suas obras e sua pessoa.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2018-12-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/97810.31977/grirfi.v18i2.978Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 18 n. 2 (2018); 176-1862178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/978/586Copyright (c) 2018 José Benedito de Almeida Júnior, Loyana Christian de Lima Tomaz, Luciana Xavier de Castroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJúnior, José Benedito de AlmeidaTomaz, Loyana Christian de LimaCastro, Luciana Xavier de2020-06-30T18:14:25Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/978Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:14:25Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Rousseau and the paradox of censorship Rousseau e o paradoxo da censura |
title |
Rousseau and the paradox of censorship |
spellingShingle |
Rousseau and the paradox of censorship Júnior, José Benedito de Almeida Censura; Filosofia; Política; Religião; Rousseau. Censorship; Philosophy; Politics; Religion; Rousseau. |
title_short |
Rousseau and the paradox of censorship |
title_full |
Rousseau and the paradox of censorship |
title_fullStr |
Rousseau and the paradox of censorship |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rousseau and the paradox of censorship |
title_sort |
Rousseau and the paradox of censorship |
author |
Júnior, José Benedito de Almeida |
author_facet |
Júnior, José Benedito de Almeida Tomaz, Loyana Christian de Lima Castro, Luciana Xavier de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tomaz, Loyana Christian de Lima Castro, Luciana Xavier de |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Júnior, José Benedito de Almeida Tomaz, Loyana Christian de Lima Castro, Luciana Xavier de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Censura; Filosofia; Política; Religião; Rousseau. Censorship; Philosophy; Politics; Religion; Rousseau. |
topic |
Censura; Filosofia; Política; Religião; Rousseau. Censorship; Philosophy; Politics; Religion; Rousseau. |
description |
This article aims to analyze the apparent contradiction between the institution of censorship in the Social Contract of Rousseau and the censorship he suffered in Geneva and Paris. With this aim, we will analyze the concept of censorship in the Social Contract and the Rousseau’s arguments in the works: Letters of the Mountain and the Letter to Christophe Beaumont, supported in the work of some experts on Rousseau's political work. Our studies allow us to conclude Jean-Jacques Rousseau does in fact, admit the possibility of censorship; however, the action of the censors must be restricted by public opinion, just like the prince’s actions by the laws. In addition, if there is a similar process it should meet all the requirements of the civil law of the State where censorship takes place. Both in Paris and in Geneva Rousseau disagrees with the way they dealt with him and his works. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/978 10.31977/grirfi.v18i2.978 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/978 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v18i2.978 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/978/586 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 18 n. 2 (2018); 176-186 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754732699538423808 |