Human rights: from the uniformity of the species to the universality of the right
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
Texto Completo: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/774 |
Resumo: | This article intends to approach, for a philosophical bias, the problem of Human Rights enunciated in Declarations of the XVIII and XX centuries. The basic question is human rights based on the "ideal of humanity" or "human dignity", considering two ideas: 1) the paradox of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen and the notion that one feels only a human "With guaranteed rights someone who sees himself contemplated in the legal scope of a nation. 2) Humanity as a "great family" (Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948), and the world as "great nation". Therefore, we promote in this work a debate between three thinkers: Diderot, with his notion of the general will of the human race; Rousseau, with his refutation of Diderot's thesis, denying that there is a "natural or general society among men"; And Kant, who in his Perpetual Peace, in his own way, takes up the notion of cosmopolitanism denied by Rousseau and points to the possibility of the right to extend to all mankind. |
id |
UFRB-4_c673d690e7cef6981d487da340757df6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/774 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Human rights: from the uniformity of the species to the universality of the rightDireitos humanos: da uniformidade da espécie à universalidade do direitoHomem; Direito; Uniformidade; Universalidade.Man; Right; Uniformity; Universality.This article intends to approach, for a philosophical bias, the problem of Human Rights enunciated in Declarations of the XVIII and XX centuries. The basic question is human rights based on the "ideal of humanity" or "human dignity", considering two ideas: 1) the paradox of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen and the notion that one feels only a human "With guaranteed rights someone who sees himself contemplated in the legal scope of a nation. 2) Humanity as a "great family" (Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948), and the world as "great nation". Therefore, we promote in this work a debate between three thinkers: Diderot, with his notion of the general will of the human race; Rousseau, with his refutation of Diderot's thesis, denying that there is a "natural or general society among men"; And Kant, who in his Perpetual Peace, in his own way, takes up the notion of cosmopolitanism denied by Rousseau and points to the possibility of the right to extend to all mankind.Este artigo pretende abordar, por um viés filosófico, o problema dos Direitos Humanos enunciados em Declarações dos séculos XVIII e XX. A questão de fundo consiste nos Direitos do Homem a partir do “ideal de humanidade” ou “dignidade humana” considerando duas ideias: 1) o paradoxo da Declaração dos Direitos do Homem e do Cidadão e a noção de que só se sente um “humano” com direitos garantidos alguém que se vê contemplado no bojo jurídico de uma nação. 2) A humanidade como “grande família” (Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos, de 1948), e o mundo como “grande nação”. Para tanto, promovemos neste trabalho um debate entre três pensadores: Diderot, com sua noção de vontade geral do gênero humano; Rousseau, com sua refutação à tese de Diderot, negando que exista uma “sociedade natural ou geral entre os homens”; e Kant, que no seu À Paz Perpétua retoma, a seu modo, a noção de cosmopolitismo negada por Rousseau e aponta para a possibilidade do direito se estender a toda a humanidade.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2017-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/77410.31977/grirfi.v16i2.774Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 16 n. 2 (2017); 132-1472178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/774/489Copyright (c) 2017 Moisés Rodrigues da Silvainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Moisés Rodrigues da2020-06-30T18:15:21Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/774Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:15:21Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Human rights: from the uniformity of the species to the universality of the right Direitos humanos: da uniformidade da espécie à universalidade do direito |
title |
Human rights: from the uniformity of the species to the universality of the right |
spellingShingle |
Human rights: from the uniformity of the species to the universality of the right Silva, Moisés Rodrigues da Homem; Direito; Uniformidade; Universalidade. Man; Right; Uniformity; Universality. |
title_short |
Human rights: from the uniformity of the species to the universality of the right |
title_full |
Human rights: from the uniformity of the species to the universality of the right |
title_fullStr |
Human rights: from the uniformity of the species to the universality of the right |
title_full_unstemmed |
Human rights: from the uniformity of the species to the universality of the right |
title_sort |
Human rights: from the uniformity of the species to the universality of the right |
author |
Silva, Moisés Rodrigues da |
author_facet |
Silva, Moisés Rodrigues da |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Moisés Rodrigues da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Homem; Direito; Uniformidade; Universalidade. Man; Right; Uniformity; Universality. |
topic |
Homem; Direito; Uniformidade; Universalidade. Man; Right; Uniformity; Universality. |
description |
This article intends to approach, for a philosophical bias, the problem of Human Rights enunciated in Declarations of the XVIII and XX centuries. The basic question is human rights based on the "ideal of humanity" or "human dignity", considering two ideas: 1) the paradox of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen and the notion that one feels only a human "With guaranteed rights someone who sees himself contemplated in the legal scope of a nation. 2) Humanity as a "great family" (Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948), and the world as "great nation". Therefore, we promote in this work a debate between three thinkers: Diderot, with his notion of the general will of the human race; Rousseau, with his refutation of Diderot's thesis, denying that there is a "natural or general society among men"; And Kant, who in his Perpetual Peace, in his own way, takes up the notion of cosmopolitanism denied by Rousseau and points to the possibility of the right to extend to all mankind. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/774 10.31977/grirfi.v16i2.774 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/774 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v16i2.774 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/774/489 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Moisés Rodrigues da Silva info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Moisés Rodrigues da Silva |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 16 n. 2 (2017); 132-147 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754732699169325056 |