The work of art as a common object
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
Texto Completo: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/737 |
Resumo: | The aim of this article is to relate Duchamp's ready-made – a work of art that is identical to a common object – with the history of art that preceded it and to understand how its radical rupture was already contained in that history. I choose to start it with an introduction and interpretation of the ready-made. Then, supported by Gombrich, Greenberg and others, I examine the three types of art in history proposed by Peter Bürger, focusing in the question of the reality/unreality of the work, gradually approaching the relation of the work with its character of object. My main point is that the two-dimensionality of the paiting reinforces the existence of the canvas (or of the support in question) and thus also the relation of its experience with the concrete world in which the paiting is found, as opposed to the dramatic illusion of the three-dimensional picture. Hereafter, I examine the impressionists, when its started a movement that goes to the reality of the canvas, which is then radicalized in various aspects of modernism, where Duchamp is found. Having taken this course, I examine Bürger's concept of vanguard and its relation to what he calls the "vital praxis", the world outside the illusionist framework, which I explain through Walter Benjamin's idea of distraction. Here, I suggest to think the ready-made as a proposal of transposition of art and its theory to the "non-artistic" world of the common things. |
id |
UFRB-4_d986d5680161772cf6c43ade69a18697 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/737 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The work of art as a common objectA obra de arte como objeto comumHistória da Arte; Arte Moderna;Walter Benjamin.Art History; Modern Art; Walter BenjaminThe aim of this article is to relate Duchamp's ready-made – a work of art that is identical to a common object – with the history of art that preceded it and to understand how its radical rupture was already contained in that history. I choose to start it with an introduction and interpretation of the ready-made. Then, supported by Gombrich, Greenberg and others, I examine the three types of art in history proposed by Peter Bürger, focusing in the question of the reality/unreality of the work, gradually approaching the relation of the work with its character of object. My main point is that the two-dimensionality of the paiting reinforces the existence of the canvas (or of the support in question) and thus also the relation of its experience with the concrete world in which the paiting is found, as opposed to the dramatic illusion of the three-dimensional picture. Hereafter, I examine the impressionists, when its started a movement that goes to the reality of the canvas, which is then radicalized in various aspects of modernism, where Duchamp is found. Having taken this course, I examine Bürger's concept of vanguard and its relation to what he calls the "vital praxis", the world outside the illusionist framework, which I explain through Walter Benjamin's idea of distraction. Here, I suggest to think the ready-made as a proposal of transposition of art and its theory to the "non-artistic" world of the common things.O objetivo deste artigo é relacionar o ready-made de Duchamp – uma obra de arte que é idêntica a um objeto comum – com a história da arte que o precedeu e entender de que modo sua ruptura radical já estava dentro dessa história. Inicio com uma introdução ao e interpretação do ready-made. Em seguida, me respaldando em Gombrich, Greenberg e outros, examino os três tipos de arte na história propostos por Peter Bürger, focando na questão da realidade/irrealidade da obra, aos poucos me aproximando da relação da obra com seu caráter de objeto. Meu ponto principal é que a bidimensionalidade do quadro reforça a existência da tela (ou do suporte em questão) e assim também a relação de sua experiência com o mundo concreto em que o quadro se encontra, em contraposição a ilusão dramática do quadro tridimensional. A seguir, examino os impressionistas, onde se inicia um movimento de encontro à realidade da tela, que se radicaliza depois em variadas vertentes do modernismo, onde se encontra Duchamp. Tendo feito este percurso, examino o conceito de vanguarda de Bürger e sua relação com o que ele chama de práxis vital, o mundo fora do quadro ilusionista, que explico através da ideia de distração de Walter Benjamin. Aqui, sugiro pensar o ready-made como uma proposta de transposição da arte e sua teoria ao mundo "não-artístico" das coisas comuns.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2017-06-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/73710.31977/grirfi.v15i1.737Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 15 n. 1 (2017); 301-3232178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/737/452Copyright (c) 2017 Filipe Ferreira Pires Völzinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVölz, Filipe Ferreira Pires2020-06-30T18:15:54Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/737Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:15:54Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The work of art as a common object A obra de arte como objeto comum |
title |
The work of art as a common object |
spellingShingle |
The work of art as a common object Völz, Filipe Ferreira Pires História da Arte; Arte Moderna;Walter Benjamin. Art History; Modern Art; Walter Benjamin |
title_short |
The work of art as a common object |
title_full |
The work of art as a common object |
title_fullStr |
The work of art as a common object |
title_full_unstemmed |
The work of art as a common object |
title_sort |
The work of art as a common object |
author |
Völz, Filipe Ferreira Pires |
author_facet |
Völz, Filipe Ferreira Pires |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Völz, Filipe Ferreira Pires |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
História da Arte; Arte Moderna;Walter Benjamin. Art History; Modern Art; Walter Benjamin |
topic |
História da Arte; Arte Moderna;Walter Benjamin. Art History; Modern Art; Walter Benjamin |
description |
The aim of this article is to relate Duchamp's ready-made – a work of art that is identical to a common object – with the history of art that preceded it and to understand how its radical rupture was already contained in that history. I choose to start it with an introduction and interpretation of the ready-made. Then, supported by Gombrich, Greenberg and others, I examine the three types of art in history proposed by Peter Bürger, focusing in the question of the reality/unreality of the work, gradually approaching the relation of the work with its character of object. My main point is that the two-dimensionality of the paiting reinforces the existence of the canvas (or of the support in question) and thus also the relation of its experience with the concrete world in which the paiting is found, as opposed to the dramatic illusion of the three-dimensional picture. Hereafter, I examine the impressionists, when its started a movement that goes to the reality of the canvas, which is then radicalized in various aspects of modernism, where Duchamp is found. Having taken this course, I examine Bürger's concept of vanguard and its relation to what he calls the "vital praxis", the world outside the illusionist framework, which I explain through Walter Benjamin's idea of distraction. Here, I suggest to think the ready-made as a proposal of transposition of art and its theory to the "non-artistic" world of the common things. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-06-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/737 10.31977/grirfi.v15i1.737 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/737 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v15i1.737 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/737/452 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Filipe Ferreira Pires Völz info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Filipe Ferreira Pires Völz |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 15 n. 1 (2017); 301-323 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754732699106410496 |