From practice to theory: reflections on the organization of social movements and popular struggles
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/99288 |
Resumo: | This paper argues for an explicit materialist ontology to study social movements and popular struggles that oppose and confront the capitalist social order. Taking into consideration that differences between theories or theoretical systems should be discussed at the ontological dimension, not merely at the epistemological, empirical or logic-formal, we address the differences between the conventional set of Social Movement Theories, the post-Marxist approach, and an alternative approach that dialogues with those engaged in contemporary struggles, through the ontology of social being formulated by György Lukács. These constitute the first part of this paper, which aims to present our ontological, theoretical and methodological positions. In the second part, we offer some theoretical reflection on the themes provided by the activists in their actions and debates, in dialogue with propositions from intellectuals who engaged with social movements and/or oriented their work to oppose the system of capital. |
id |
UFRGS-13_550922f034260293be17c7a48df9ffe6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/99288 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-13 |
network_name_str |
REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
From practice to theory: reflections on the organization of social movements and popular strugglesSocial Movements. Ontology. Popular Struggles. Resistance.This paper argues for an explicit materialist ontology to study social movements and popular struggles that oppose and confront the capitalist social order. Taking into consideration that differences between theories or theoretical systems should be discussed at the ontological dimension, not merely at the epistemological, empirical or logic-formal, we address the differences between the conventional set of Social Movement Theories, the post-Marxist approach, and an alternative approach that dialogues with those engaged in contemporary struggles, through the ontology of social being formulated by György Lukács. These constitute the first part of this paper, which aims to present our ontological, theoretical and methodological positions. In the second part, we offer some theoretical reflection on the themes provided by the activists in their actions and debates, in dialogue with propositions from intellectuals who engaged with social movements and/or oriented their work to oppose the system of capital.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2020-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/99288Electronic Review of Administration; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2020): JANEIRO / ABRIL; 18-48Revista Electrónica de Administración; Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2020): JANEIRO / ABRIL; 18-48Revista Eletrônica de Administração; v. 26 n. 1 (2020): JANEIRO / ABRIL; 18-481413-23111980-4164reponame:REAd (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/99288/56520Copyright (c) 2020 Maria Ceci Misoczky, Rafael Kruter Floresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMisoczky, Maria CeciFlores, Rafael Kruter2020-09-15T21:42:26Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/99288Revistahttp://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/indexPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/read/oaiea_read@ufrgs.br1413-23111413-2311opendoar:2020-09-15T21:42:26REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
From practice to theory: reflections on the organization of social movements and popular struggles |
title |
From practice to theory: reflections on the organization of social movements and popular struggles |
spellingShingle |
From practice to theory: reflections on the organization of social movements and popular struggles Misoczky, Maria Ceci Social Movements. Ontology. Popular Struggles. Resistance. |
title_short |
From practice to theory: reflections on the organization of social movements and popular struggles |
title_full |
From practice to theory: reflections on the organization of social movements and popular struggles |
title_fullStr |
From practice to theory: reflections on the organization of social movements and popular struggles |
title_full_unstemmed |
From practice to theory: reflections on the organization of social movements and popular struggles |
title_sort |
From practice to theory: reflections on the organization of social movements and popular struggles |
author |
Misoczky, Maria Ceci |
author_facet |
Misoczky, Maria Ceci Flores, Rafael Kruter |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Flores, Rafael Kruter |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Misoczky, Maria Ceci Flores, Rafael Kruter |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Social Movements. Ontology. Popular Struggles. Resistance. |
topic |
Social Movements. Ontology. Popular Struggles. Resistance. |
description |
This paper argues for an explicit materialist ontology to study social movements and popular struggles that oppose and confront the capitalist social order. Taking into consideration that differences between theories or theoretical systems should be discussed at the ontological dimension, not merely at the epistemological, empirical or logic-formal, we address the differences between the conventional set of Social Movement Theories, the post-Marxist approach, and an alternative approach that dialogues with those engaged in contemporary struggles, through the ontology of social being formulated by György Lukács. These constitute the first part of this paper, which aims to present our ontological, theoretical and methodological positions. In the second part, we offer some theoretical reflection on the themes provided by the activists in their actions and debates, in dialogue with propositions from intellectuals who engaged with social movements and/or oriented their work to oppose the system of capital. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/99288 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/99288 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/99288/56520 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Maria Ceci Misoczky, Rafael Kruter Flores info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Maria Ceci Misoczky, Rafael Kruter Flores |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Electronic Review of Administration; Vol. 26 No. 1 (2020): JANEIRO / ABRIL; 18-48 Revista Electrónica de Administración; Vol. 26 Núm. 1 (2020): JANEIRO / ABRIL; 18-48 Revista Eletrônica de Administração; v. 26 n. 1 (2020): JANEIRO / ABRIL; 18-48 1413-2311 1980-4164 reponame:REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) |
collection |
REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ea_read@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1799766206070128640 |