ARE ISO 14001 CERTIFIED FIRMS MORE PROFITABLE? AN APROACH TO OPEN COMPANIES IN BRAZIL
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/39182 |
Resumo: | This paper aims to present the results of a study that identified in the Annual Report of Information (IAN) companies that presented in 2006 (covering the period of 2005) information related to environmental issues and to verify if there were differences in performance between those companies. There were identified three different groups of companies being, 45 who reported having a system of environmental monitoring, 40 companies that did not have any environmental information and 24 companies that reported to have the environmental certification (ISO 14001), totaling 109 companies distributed in seven sectors of the economy. The motivation to study these sectors of the economy was based on the Annex VIII of Law No 10165 of December 27, 2000, the National Environment Policy. According to this document, the activities of potentially polluting (PP) and users of natural resources (GU) of these sectors are considered of high and medium grade. Three variables were used for performance: return on assets (ROA), operating profit of Assets (ROAOP) and profitability of the PL (ROE). It was found through the analysis if there were significant differences in the variables of profitability among the three groups of companies. The results did not show statistically significant differences for any of the variables, however, the group of companies with environmental certification showed profitability higher in relation to other groups of companies for all variables of performance. Another feature observed was that the chemical industry has largest number of companies with ISO 14001 certification. |
id |
UFRGS-13_95a790b6c8f5ed617c19afc711eb983d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/39182 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-13 |
network_name_str |
REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ARE ISO 14001 CERTIFIED FIRMS MORE PROFITABLE? AN APROACH TO OPEN COMPANIES IN BRAZIL¿LAS EMPRESAS CON CERTIFICACIÓN ISO 14001 SON MÁS RENTABLES? UN ABORDAJE EN COMPAÑÍAS ABIERTAS EN BRASILAS EMPRESAS COM CERTIFICAÇÃO ISO 14001 SÃO MAIS RENTÁVEIS? UMA ABORDAGEM EM COMPANHIAS ABERTAS NO BRASILmeio ambientesistema de gestão ambientalcertificação ISO 14001vantagem competitivaperformanceenvironmentenvironmental management systemISO 14001 certificationcompetitive advantageperformancemedio ambientesistema de gestión ambientalcertificación ISO 14001ventaja competitivadesempeñoThis paper aims to present the results of a study that identified in the Annual Report of Information (IAN) companies that presented in 2006 (covering the period of 2005) information related to environmental issues and to verify if there were differences in performance between those companies. There were identified three different groups of companies being, 45 who reported having a system of environmental monitoring, 40 companies that did not have any environmental information and 24 companies that reported to have the environmental certification (ISO 14001), totaling 109 companies distributed in seven sectors of the economy. The motivation to study these sectors of the economy was based on the Annex VIII of Law No 10165 of December 27, 2000, the National Environment Policy. According to this document, the activities of potentially polluting (PP) and users of natural resources (GU) of these sectors are considered of high and medium grade. Three variables were used for performance: return on assets (ROA), operating profit of Assets (ROAOP) and profitability of the PL (ROE). It was found through the analysis if there were significant differences in the variables of profitability among the three groups of companies. The results did not show statistically significant differences for any of the variables, however, the group of companies with environmental certification showed profitability higher in relation to other groups of companies for all variables of performance. Another feature observed was that the chemical industry has largest number of companies with ISO 14001 certification.Este artículo pretende presentar los resultados de un estudio que identificó en el Informe de Información Anual (IAN) empresas que presentaron en 2006 (referente al periodo de 2005) informaciones relacionadas a las cuestiones ambientales y verificar se habían diferencias en el desempeño entre esas empresas. Fueron identificados tres grupos de empresas siendo, 45 que informaron poseer algún sistema de monitorización ambiental, 40 empresas que no poseían ninguna información ambiental y 24 empresas que decían poseer la certificación ambiental (ISO 14001), totalizando 109 empresas distribuidas en siete sectores de la economía. Se optó por estudiar esos sectores de la economía teniendo en vista que según el anexo VIII de la Ley n 10.165 de 27 de diciembre de 2000, de la Política Nacional de Medio Ambiente, las actividades potencialmente contaminadoras (PP) y utilizadoras de recursos naturales (GU), de estos sectores, son consideradas de alto y mediano grado. Tres variables de desempeño fueron utilizadas: rentabilidad del activo (ROA), rentabilidad operacional del activo (ROAOP) y rentabilidad del PL (ROE). Se verificó a través del análisis de variancia la existencia de diferencias significativas en las variables de rentabilidad entre los tres grupos de empresas. Los resultados no presentaron diferencias estadísticas significativas para ninguna de las variables, sin embargo, en el grupo de empresas con certificación ambiental, la rentabilidad fue superior en relación a los de más grupos de empresas para todas las variables de desempeño. Otra característica observada fue que el sector Químico es el sector que posee mayor número de empresas con certificación ISO 14001.Este artigo visa apresentar os resultados de um estudo que identificou no Relatório de Informação Anual (IAN) empresas que apresentaram em 2006 (referente ao período de 2005) informações relacionadas às questões ambientais e verificar se haviam diferenças na performance entre essas empresas. Foram identificados três grupos de empresas sendo, 45 que informaram possuir algum sistema de monitoramento ambiental, 40 empresas que não possuíam nenhuma informação ambiental e 24 empresas que diziam possuir a certificação ambiental (ISO 14001), totalizando 109 empresas distribuídas em sete setores da economia. Optou-se por estudar esses setores da economia tendo em vista que segundo o anexo VIII da Lei n 10.165 de 27 de dezembro de 2000, da Política Nacional de Meio Ambiente, as atividades potencialmente poluidoras (PP) e utilizadoras de recursos naturais (GU), destes setores, são consideradas de alto e médio grau. Três variáveis de performance foram utilizadas: rentabilidade do ativo (ROA), rentabilidade operacional do ativo (ROAOP) e rentabilidade do PL (ROE). Verificou-se através da análise de variância a existência de diferenças significativas nas variáveis de rentabilidade entre os três grupos de empresas. Os resultados não apresentaram diferenças estatísticas significativas para nenhuma das variáveis, todavia, no grupo de empresas com certificação ambiental, a rentabilidade foi superior em relação aos demais grupos de empresas para todas as variáveis de performance. Outra característica observada foi que o setor Químico é o setor que possui maior número de empresas com certificação ISO 14001.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2013-04-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionscientific articlearticulo científicoAvaliado pelos paresartigo científicoapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/39182Electronic Review of Administration; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2009): Edição 62 - jan/abr 2009; 108-131Revista Electrónica de Administración; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2009): Edição 62 - jan/abr 2009; 108-131Revista Eletrônica de Administração; v. 15 n. 1 (2009): Edição 62 - jan/abr 2009; 108-1311413-23111980-4164reponame:REAd (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/39182/25044de Souza Campos, Lucila MariaGrzebieluckas, CleciSelig, Paulo Mauricioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-02-12T16:59:32Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/39182Revistahttp://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/indexPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/read/oaiea_read@ufrgs.br1413-23111413-2311opendoar:2014-02-12T16:59:32REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ARE ISO 14001 CERTIFIED FIRMS MORE PROFITABLE? AN APROACH TO OPEN COMPANIES IN BRAZIL ¿LAS EMPRESAS CON CERTIFICACIÓN ISO 14001 SON MÁS RENTABLES? UN ABORDAJE EN COMPAÑÍAS ABIERTAS EN BRASIL AS EMPRESAS COM CERTIFICAÇÃO ISO 14001 SÃO MAIS RENTÁVEIS? UMA ABORDAGEM EM COMPANHIAS ABERTAS NO BRASIL |
title |
ARE ISO 14001 CERTIFIED FIRMS MORE PROFITABLE? AN APROACH TO OPEN COMPANIES IN BRAZIL |
spellingShingle |
ARE ISO 14001 CERTIFIED FIRMS MORE PROFITABLE? AN APROACH TO OPEN COMPANIES IN BRAZIL de Souza Campos, Lucila Maria meio ambiente sistema de gestão ambiental certificação ISO 14001 vantagem competitiva performance environment environmental management system ISO 14001 certification competitive advantage performance medio ambiente sistema de gestión ambiental certificación ISO 14001 ventaja competitiva desempeño |
title_short |
ARE ISO 14001 CERTIFIED FIRMS MORE PROFITABLE? AN APROACH TO OPEN COMPANIES IN BRAZIL |
title_full |
ARE ISO 14001 CERTIFIED FIRMS MORE PROFITABLE? AN APROACH TO OPEN COMPANIES IN BRAZIL |
title_fullStr |
ARE ISO 14001 CERTIFIED FIRMS MORE PROFITABLE? AN APROACH TO OPEN COMPANIES IN BRAZIL |
title_full_unstemmed |
ARE ISO 14001 CERTIFIED FIRMS MORE PROFITABLE? AN APROACH TO OPEN COMPANIES IN BRAZIL |
title_sort |
ARE ISO 14001 CERTIFIED FIRMS MORE PROFITABLE? AN APROACH TO OPEN COMPANIES IN BRAZIL |
author |
de Souza Campos, Lucila Maria |
author_facet |
de Souza Campos, Lucila Maria Grzebieluckas, Cleci Selig, Paulo Mauricio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Grzebieluckas, Cleci Selig, Paulo Mauricio |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Souza Campos, Lucila Maria Grzebieluckas, Cleci Selig, Paulo Mauricio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
meio ambiente sistema de gestão ambiental certificação ISO 14001 vantagem competitiva performance environment environmental management system ISO 14001 certification competitive advantage performance medio ambiente sistema de gestión ambiental certificación ISO 14001 ventaja competitiva desempeño |
topic |
meio ambiente sistema de gestão ambiental certificação ISO 14001 vantagem competitiva performance environment environmental management system ISO 14001 certification competitive advantage performance medio ambiente sistema de gestión ambiental certificación ISO 14001 ventaja competitiva desempeño |
description |
This paper aims to present the results of a study that identified in the Annual Report of Information (IAN) companies that presented in 2006 (covering the period of 2005) information related to environmental issues and to verify if there were differences in performance between those companies. There were identified three different groups of companies being, 45 who reported having a system of environmental monitoring, 40 companies that did not have any environmental information and 24 companies that reported to have the environmental certification (ISO 14001), totaling 109 companies distributed in seven sectors of the economy. The motivation to study these sectors of the economy was based on the Annex VIII of Law No 10165 of December 27, 2000, the National Environment Policy. According to this document, the activities of potentially polluting (PP) and users of natural resources (GU) of these sectors are considered of high and medium grade. Three variables were used for performance: return on assets (ROA), operating profit of Assets (ROAOP) and profitability of the PL (ROE). It was found through the analysis if there were significant differences in the variables of profitability among the three groups of companies. The results did not show statistically significant differences for any of the variables, however, the group of companies with environmental certification showed profitability higher in relation to other groups of companies for all variables of performance. Another feature observed was that the chemical industry has largest number of companies with ISO 14001 certification. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-04-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion scientific article articulo científico Avaliado pelos pares artigo científico |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/39182 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/39182 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/read/article/view/39182/25044 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Electronic Review of Administration; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2009): Edição 62 - jan/abr 2009; 108-131 Revista Electrónica de Administración; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2009): Edição 62 - jan/abr 2009; 108-131 Revista Eletrônica de Administração; v. 15 n. 1 (2009): Edição 62 - jan/abr 2009; 108-131 1413-2311 1980-4164 reponame:REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) |
collection |
REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
REAd (Porto Alegre. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ea_read@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1799766202520698880 |