Evaluation of cervical cancer screening programs in the State of Rio Grande do Sul - Southern Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Clinical and Biomedical Research |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/125276 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To compare two modalities of cervical cancer screening using Pap Smearthat were carried out in the state of Rio Grande do Sul - Southern Brazil. The first oneis a seasonal and isolated campaign that was promoted by the Brazilian Ministry ofHealth in 1998; the second one is a regular screening program promoted by the RioGrande do Sul State Department of Health from 1991 to 1996. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study of the results of thetwo screening campaigns.RESULTS: Comparison of the Pap smear sample alterations verified from 1991 to 1996by the State Department of Health with the Pap smear sample alterations verified in1998 by the Ministry of Health allowed for the following data, respectively: CIN 1 -0.55%/0.29%; CIN 2 - 0.25%/0.15%; CIN 3 - 0.16%/0.14%; carcinoma - 0.04%/0.04%.Out of the samples collected by the State Department of Health, 58.64% were notrepresentative for squamous columnar junction (SCJ), out of which 13.74% of highgrade lesions were not representative for SCJ and 85.22% of high-grade lesions wererepresentative for ECJ (1.04% of results were ignored).CONCLUSIONS: The isolated campaign of the Brazilian Ministry of Health in the stateof Rio Grande do Sul presented poorer results when compared to the regular screeningprogram promoted by the Rio Grande do Sul State Department of Health, suggesting,thus, that isolated screening efforts do not offer results that are as good as those ofplanned and continuous screening programs. However, the regular screening programhas faults that need to be corrected, such as that in the reduced number of Pap smearsamples representative of squamous columnar junction. |
id |
UFRGS-20_3204f78dcba22d3e52ce2e450e2e474c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/125276 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-20 |
network_name_str |
Clinical and Biomedical Research |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of cervical cancer screening programs in the State of Rio Grande do Sul - Southern BrazilAvaliação dos programas de screening para o câncer de colo uterino no Estado do Rio Grande do SulCâncer de colo uterinocitologia cervicalprogramas de screening para câncer de colo uterinoCervical cancercervical cytologycervical cancer screening programOBJECTIVE: To compare two modalities of cervical cancer screening using Pap Smearthat were carried out in the state of Rio Grande do Sul - Southern Brazil. The first oneis a seasonal and isolated campaign that was promoted by the Brazilian Ministry ofHealth in 1998; the second one is a regular screening program promoted by the RioGrande do Sul State Department of Health from 1991 to 1996. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study of the results of thetwo screening campaigns.RESULTS: Comparison of the Pap smear sample alterations verified from 1991 to 1996by the State Department of Health with the Pap smear sample alterations verified in1998 by the Ministry of Health allowed for the following data, respectively: CIN 1 -0.55%/0.29%; CIN 2 - 0.25%/0.15%; CIN 3 - 0.16%/0.14%; carcinoma - 0.04%/0.04%.Out of the samples collected by the State Department of Health, 58.64% were notrepresentative for squamous columnar junction (SCJ), out of which 13.74% of highgrade lesions were not representative for SCJ and 85.22% of high-grade lesions wererepresentative for ECJ (1.04% of results were ignored).CONCLUSIONS: The isolated campaign of the Brazilian Ministry of Health in the stateof Rio Grande do Sul presented poorer results when compared to the regular screeningprogram promoted by the Rio Grande do Sul State Department of Health, suggesting,thus, that isolated screening efforts do not offer results that are as good as those ofplanned and continuous screening programs. However, the regular screening programhas faults that need to be corrected, such as that in the reduced number of Pap smearsamples representative of squamous columnar junction. OBJETIVO: Comparar duas modalidades de screening de câncer de colo uterino porexame citopatológico (CP) desenvolvidas no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul: uma, sazonale isolada, promovida pelo Ministério da Saúde em 1998; outra, regular, promovida pelaSecretaria da Saúde do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul no período de 1991 a 1996.MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: avaliou-se retrospectivamente os resultados obtidos com acoleta de exames citopatológicos de colo uterino da campanha do Ministério da Saúdee do programa regular da Secretaria da Saúde do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul.RESULTADOS: Comparando-se o percentual de alterações nos exames coletados pelaSecretaria da Saúde em 1996 com os exames coletados pelo Ministério da Saúde em1998, obteve-se, respectivamente: NIC I - 0,55% / 0,29%; NIC II - 0,25% / 0,15%; NICIII - 0,16% / 0,14%; carcinoma - 0,04% / 0,04%. Quanto aos exames coletados pelaSecretaria da Saúde no período 1991-1996, 58,64% não eram representativos da junçãoescamo-colunar (JEC). Sobre estes, somente 13,74% das lesões de alto grauencontravam-se em CPs não representativos da JEC, enquanto 85,22% das lesões dealto grau encontravam-se nos CPs representativos da JEC (1,04% dos resultadosignorados).CONCLUSÕES: A campanha sazonal do Ministério da Saúde no Rio Grande do Sulapresentou desempenho desfavorável quando comparada ao programa regular daSecretaria da Saúde, sugerindo que rastreamentos isolados tenham eficácia menorque rastreamentos planejados e contínuos. O próprio rastreamento regular possui falhasque devem ser corrigidas, como a baixa representatividade da junção escamo-colunar.HCPA/FAMED/UFRGS2022-06-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/125276Clinical & Biomedical Research; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2000): Revista HCPAClinical and Biomedical Research; v. 20 n. 2 (2000): Revista HCPA2357-9730reponame:Clinical and Biomedical Researchinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/125276/85201http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNaud, Paulo de Matos, Jean Carlos Hammes, Luciano Vettorazzi, Janete 2022-09-16T16:33:08Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/125276Revistahttps://www.seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpaPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/oai||cbr@hcpa.edu.br2357-97302357-9730opendoar:2022-09-16T16:33:08Clinical and Biomedical Research - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of cervical cancer screening programs in the State of Rio Grande do Sul - Southern Brazil Avaliação dos programas de screening para o câncer de colo uterino no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul |
title |
Evaluation of cervical cancer screening programs in the State of Rio Grande do Sul - Southern Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of cervical cancer screening programs in the State of Rio Grande do Sul - Southern Brazil Naud, Paulo Câncer de colo uterino citologia cervical programas de screening para câncer de colo uterino Cervical cancer cervical cytology cervical cancer screening program |
title_short |
Evaluation of cervical cancer screening programs in the State of Rio Grande do Sul - Southern Brazil |
title_full |
Evaluation of cervical cancer screening programs in the State of Rio Grande do Sul - Southern Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of cervical cancer screening programs in the State of Rio Grande do Sul - Southern Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of cervical cancer screening programs in the State of Rio Grande do Sul - Southern Brazil |
title_sort |
Evaluation of cervical cancer screening programs in the State of Rio Grande do Sul - Southern Brazil |
author |
Naud, Paulo |
author_facet |
Naud, Paulo de Matos, Jean Carlos Hammes, Luciano Vettorazzi, Janete |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
de Matos, Jean Carlos Hammes, Luciano Vettorazzi, Janete |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Naud, Paulo de Matos, Jean Carlos Hammes, Luciano Vettorazzi, Janete |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Câncer de colo uterino citologia cervical programas de screening para câncer de colo uterino Cervical cancer cervical cytology cervical cancer screening program |
topic |
Câncer de colo uterino citologia cervical programas de screening para câncer de colo uterino Cervical cancer cervical cytology cervical cancer screening program |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To compare two modalities of cervical cancer screening using Pap Smearthat were carried out in the state of Rio Grande do Sul - Southern Brazil. The first oneis a seasonal and isolated campaign that was promoted by the Brazilian Ministry ofHealth in 1998; the second one is a regular screening program promoted by the RioGrande do Sul State Department of Health from 1991 to 1996. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study of the results of thetwo screening campaigns.RESULTS: Comparison of the Pap smear sample alterations verified from 1991 to 1996by the State Department of Health with the Pap smear sample alterations verified in1998 by the Ministry of Health allowed for the following data, respectively: CIN 1 -0.55%/0.29%; CIN 2 - 0.25%/0.15%; CIN 3 - 0.16%/0.14%; carcinoma - 0.04%/0.04%.Out of the samples collected by the State Department of Health, 58.64% were notrepresentative for squamous columnar junction (SCJ), out of which 13.74% of highgrade lesions were not representative for SCJ and 85.22% of high-grade lesions wererepresentative for ECJ (1.04% of results were ignored).CONCLUSIONS: The isolated campaign of the Brazilian Ministry of Health in the stateof Rio Grande do Sul presented poorer results when compared to the regular screeningprogram promoted by the Rio Grande do Sul State Department of Health, suggesting,thus, that isolated screening efforts do not offer results that are as good as those ofplanned and continuous screening programs. However, the regular screening programhas faults that need to be corrected, such as that in the reduced number of Pap smearsamples representative of squamous columnar junction. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article Avaliado por Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/125276 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/125276 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/125276/85201 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
HCPA/FAMED/UFRGS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
HCPA/FAMED/UFRGS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical & Biomedical Research; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2000): Revista HCPA Clinical and Biomedical Research; v. 20 n. 2 (2000): Revista HCPA 2357-9730 reponame:Clinical and Biomedical Research instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Clinical and Biomedical Research |
collection |
Clinical and Biomedical Research |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Clinical and Biomedical Research - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||cbr@hcpa.edu.br |
_version_ |
1799767056940269568 |