Non-viral gene transfer to the tendon: comparison of two methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Melendez, Matias
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Lagranha, Valeska Lizzi, Baptista, André, Lompa, Paulo Arlei, Giugliani, Roberto, Matte, Ursula
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Clinical and Biomedical Research
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/22796
Resumo: Background: tendons are part of the connective tissue that joins muscle to bone. Tendon injuries are a problem, since they have a poor ability to regenerate spontaneously. Alternative treatments involving the injection of local growth factors and gene transfer has been evaluated. Thus, we compared two methods for non-viral gene transfer tendons, using the GFP gene as reporter gene.Methods: Wistar rats had the medial quadriceps tendon exposed and the plasmid was transferred by direct injection or complexed with liposomes. Quantification of GFP in the tendom and in the spleen was evaluated by histological analysis with a fluorescence microscope.Results: gene transfer to the tendon was successfully obtained in both treatments. Lipoplex, as expected, showed the highest efficiency in transducing tenocytes, however we have found GFP expression also in the spleen. Naked DNA also showed fluorescence values above the control group and the signal was limited to the tendom.Discussion: the use of GFP as a reporter gene is a classical approach to evaluate gene transfer efficiency. Non-viral gene transfer methods are safe but show low levels of transduction and transient expression. For tendon repair, however, these characteristics may prove beneficial because a transient expression may be desirable to avoid the risk of adverse effects. GFP distribution in the spleen was probably a result of lipoplexes uptake by cells from the reticular endothelial system.Conclusion: taking into account the distribution of GFP in another tissue when using lipoplex, we believe that naked DNA is a more appropriate way to perform gene transfer to the tendon, ensuring safety, low cost and easy handling.
id UFRGS-20_3d528e3f2f9aeb8a1df7133ba57cf374
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/22796
network_acronym_str UFRGS-20
network_name_str Clinical and Biomedical Research
repository_id_str
spelling Non-viral gene transfer to the tendon: comparison of two methodsTendons injuryGPF expressiongene transferGene Transfer TechniquesBackground: tendons are part of the connective tissue that joins muscle to bone. Tendon injuries are a problem, since they have a poor ability to regenerate spontaneously. Alternative treatments involving the injection of local growth factors and gene transfer has been evaluated. Thus, we compared two methods for non-viral gene transfer tendons, using the GFP gene as reporter gene.Methods: Wistar rats had the medial quadriceps tendon exposed and the plasmid was transferred by direct injection or complexed with liposomes. Quantification of GFP in the tendom and in the spleen was evaluated by histological analysis with a fluorescence microscope.Results: gene transfer to the tendon was successfully obtained in both treatments. Lipoplex, as expected, showed the highest efficiency in transducing tenocytes, however we have found GFP expression also in the spleen. Naked DNA also showed fluorescence values above the control group and the signal was limited to the tendom.Discussion: the use of GFP as a reporter gene is a classical approach to evaluate gene transfer efficiency. Non-viral gene transfer methods are safe but show low levels of transduction and transient expression. For tendon repair, however, these characteristics may prove beneficial because a transient expression may be desirable to avoid the risk of adverse effects. GFP distribution in the spleen was probably a result of lipoplexes uptake by cells from the reticular endothelial system.Conclusion: taking into account the distribution of GFP in another tissue when using lipoplex, we believe that naked DNA is a more appropriate way to perform gene transfer to the tendon, ensuring safety, low cost and easy handling.HCPA/FAMED/UFRGS2012-01-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/22796Clinical & Biomedical Research; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2011): Revista HCPAClinical and Biomedical Research; v. 31 n. 4 (2011): Revista HCPA2357-9730reponame:Clinical and Biomedical Researchinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/22796/14951Melendez, MatiasLagranha, Valeska LizziBaptista, AndréLompa, Paulo ArleiGiugliani, RobertoMatte, Ursulainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-01-16T18:23:19Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/22796Revistahttps://www.seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpaPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/oai||cbr@hcpa.edu.br2357-97302357-9730opendoar:2020-01-16T18:23:19Clinical and Biomedical Research - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Non-viral gene transfer to the tendon: comparison of two methods
title Non-viral gene transfer to the tendon: comparison of two methods
spellingShingle Non-viral gene transfer to the tendon: comparison of two methods
Melendez, Matias
Tendons injury
GPF expression
gene transfer
Gene Transfer Techniques
title_short Non-viral gene transfer to the tendon: comparison of two methods
title_full Non-viral gene transfer to the tendon: comparison of two methods
title_fullStr Non-viral gene transfer to the tendon: comparison of two methods
title_full_unstemmed Non-viral gene transfer to the tendon: comparison of two methods
title_sort Non-viral gene transfer to the tendon: comparison of two methods
author Melendez, Matias
author_facet Melendez, Matias
Lagranha, Valeska Lizzi
Baptista, André
Lompa, Paulo Arlei
Giugliani, Roberto
Matte, Ursula
author_role author
author2 Lagranha, Valeska Lizzi
Baptista, André
Lompa, Paulo Arlei
Giugliani, Roberto
Matte, Ursula
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Melendez, Matias
Lagranha, Valeska Lizzi
Baptista, André
Lompa, Paulo Arlei
Giugliani, Roberto
Matte, Ursula
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tendons injury
GPF expression
gene transfer
Gene Transfer Techniques
topic Tendons injury
GPF expression
gene transfer
Gene Transfer Techniques
description Background: tendons are part of the connective tissue that joins muscle to bone. Tendon injuries are a problem, since they have a poor ability to regenerate spontaneously. Alternative treatments involving the injection of local growth factors and gene transfer has been evaluated. Thus, we compared two methods for non-viral gene transfer tendons, using the GFP gene as reporter gene.Methods: Wistar rats had the medial quadriceps tendon exposed and the plasmid was transferred by direct injection or complexed with liposomes. Quantification of GFP in the tendom and in the spleen was evaluated by histological analysis with a fluorescence microscope.Results: gene transfer to the tendon was successfully obtained in both treatments. Lipoplex, as expected, showed the highest efficiency in transducing tenocytes, however we have found GFP expression also in the spleen. Naked DNA also showed fluorescence values above the control group and the signal was limited to the tendom.Discussion: the use of GFP as a reporter gene is a classical approach to evaluate gene transfer efficiency. Non-viral gene transfer methods are safe but show low levels of transduction and transient expression. For tendon repair, however, these characteristics may prove beneficial because a transient expression may be desirable to avoid the risk of adverse effects. GFP distribution in the spleen was probably a result of lipoplexes uptake by cells from the reticular endothelial system.Conclusion: taking into account the distribution of GFP in another tissue when using lipoplex, we believe that naked DNA is a more appropriate way to perform gene transfer to the tendon, ensuring safety, low cost and easy handling.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-01-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/22796
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/22796
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/22796/14951
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv HCPA/FAMED/UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv HCPA/FAMED/UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinical & Biomedical Research; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2011): Revista HCPA
Clinical and Biomedical Research; v. 31 n. 4 (2011): Revista HCPA
2357-9730
reponame:Clinical and Biomedical Research
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Clinical and Biomedical Research
collection Clinical and Biomedical Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinical and Biomedical Research - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cbr@hcpa.edu.br
_version_ 1799767052759597056