FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURE AND RISK: EVIDENCE IN PUBLIC COMPANIES BEST TRADED IN BM&FBOVESPA

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinho, Gledstone Alves
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Parente, Paulo Henrique Nobre, Coelho, Antônio Carlos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: ConTexto
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/article/view/56823
Resumo: The study aims to analyze the connection between mandatory disclosure level of risks arising from financial instruments and the extent of Brazilian public companies risk under the hypothesis that highest disclosure implies lower risk of perception by investors. The sample was composed by BM&FBovespa public companies best traded, limited to the 42 that released the information demanded by the research. The disclosure level was estimated by index based on CVM Resolution 684/12 requirements. The perception of risk was measured by Financial Leverage Ratio, Value-at-Risk and Sharpe Ratio. The mandatory disclosure was accomplished, on average, by 61% of firms, despite their report obligation. Recommended qualitative information was disclosed more frequently than required quantitative assessments. By multiple linear regression estimated by OLS, we were able to reject the formulated hypothesis, highlighting the larger impact on indexes in firms with high levels of derivatives and financial instruments utilization. This study may contribute to explain the connection among financial instruments disclosure and company risk perception, providing the investors and regulators with evidences that the market faces low level of financial instruments disclosure, and this can contribute to affect firms’ perception of risk level by investors.
id UFRGS-23_56181c65d0469832c070906f1ebf2ce2
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/56823
network_acronym_str UFRGS-23
network_name_str ConTexto
repository_id_str
spelling FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURE AND RISK: EVIDENCE IN PUBLIC COMPANIES BEST TRADED IN BM&FBOVESPADISCLOSURE DE INSTRUMENTOS FINANCEIROS E RISCO: EVIDÊNCIAS NAS SOCIEDADES POR AÇÃO DE CAPITAL ABERTO MAIS NEGOCIADAS NA BM&FBOVESPARiscoEvidenciaçãoInstrumentos financeirosRiskDisclosureFinancial instrumentsThe study aims to analyze the connection between mandatory disclosure level of risks arising from financial instruments and the extent of Brazilian public companies risk under the hypothesis that highest disclosure implies lower risk of perception by investors. The sample was composed by BM&FBovespa public companies best traded, limited to the 42 that released the information demanded by the research. The disclosure level was estimated by index based on CVM Resolution 684/12 requirements. The perception of risk was measured by Financial Leverage Ratio, Value-at-Risk and Sharpe Ratio. The mandatory disclosure was accomplished, on average, by 61% of firms, despite their report obligation. Recommended qualitative information was disclosed more frequently than required quantitative assessments. By multiple linear regression estimated by OLS, we were able to reject the formulated hypothesis, highlighting the larger impact on indexes in firms with high levels of derivatives and financial instruments utilization. This study may contribute to explain the connection among financial instruments disclosure and company risk perception, providing the investors and regulators with evidences that the market faces low level of financial instruments disclosure, and this can contribute to affect firms’ perception of risk level by investors.O objetivo do estudo é analisar a relação entre o nível de disclosure obrigatório de riscos decorrentes de instrumentos financeiros e a medida de risco das empresas brasileiras, sob a hipótese de que, quanto maior o disclosure, menor a percepção de risco adviria dos investidores. A amostra foi composta pelas sociedades por ação de capital aberto de maior liquidez na BM&FBovespa, limitadas às 42 que divulgaram informações suficientes para a pesquisa. Mensurou-se o nível de disclosure por índice baseado nas exigências contidas na Deliberação CVM nº 684/12. Já a percepção de risco foi mensurada por estimativas de Grau de Alavancagem Financeira, Value-at-Risk e Índice de Sharpe. O índice de atendimento ao disclosure obrigatório foi atendido, na média, em 61%, apesar de sua obrigatoriedade. Também constatou-se que informações qualitativas exibiram maior frequência de divulgação do que informações com avaliações quantitativas recomendadas. Utilizando-se de regressão linear múltipla, com estimação por MQO, rejeitou-se a hipótese formulada, destacando-se maior impacto em índices de empresas com alto teor de utilização de derivativos e de instrumentos financeiros. O estudo contribui na explicação da divulgação de instrumentos financeiros em face do risco das empresas, fornecendo evidência informacional para reguladores e investidores sobre o baixo atendimento de disclosure obrigatório, alertando para que se possa rever a utilidade da informação contábil compulsória.UFRGS2017-03-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/article/view/56823ConTexto - Contabilidade em Texto; v. 16 n. 33 (2016): maio/ago. 2016; 58-732175-87511676-6016reponame:ConTextoinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/article/view/56823/pdfCopyright (c) 2017 ConTextoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinho, Gledstone AlvesParente, Paulo Henrique NobreCoelho, Antônio Carlos2017-03-08T02:42:26Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/56823Revistahttps://www.seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/indexPUBhttpw://www.seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/oaifernanda.momo@ufrgs.br||contexto@ufrgs.br2175-87511676-6016opendoar:2017-03-08T02:42:26ConTexto - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURE AND RISK: EVIDENCE IN PUBLIC COMPANIES BEST TRADED IN BM&FBOVESPA
DISCLOSURE DE INSTRUMENTOS FINANCEIROS E RISCO: EVIDÊNCIAS NAS SOCIEDADES POR AÇÃO DE CAPITAL ABERTO MAIS NEGOCIADAS NA BM&FBOVESPA
title FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURE AND RISK: EVIDENCE IN PUBLIC COMPANIES BEST TRADED IN BM&FBOVESPA
spellingShingle FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURE AND RISK: EVIDENCE IN PUBLIC COMPANIES BEST TRADED IN BM&FBOVESPA
Pinho, Gledstone Alves
Risco
Evidenciação
Instrumentos financeiros
Risk
Disclosure
Financial instruments
title_short FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURE AND RISK: EVIDENCE IN PUBLIC COMPANIES BEST TRADED IN BM&FBOVESPA
title_full FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURE AND RISK: EVIDENCE IN PUBLIC COMPANIES BEST TRADED IN BM&FBOVESPA
title_fullStr FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURE AND RISK: EVIDENCE IN PUBLIC COMPANIES BEST TRADED IN BM&FBOVESPA
title_full_unstemmed FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURE AND RISK: EVIDENCE IN PUBLIC COMPANIES BEST TRADED IN BM&FBOVESPA
title_sort FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS DISCLOSURE AND RISK: EVIDENCE IN PUBLIC COMPANIES BEST TRADED IN BM&FBOVESPA
author Pinho, Gledstone Alves
author_facet Pinho, Gledstone Alves
Parente, Paulo Henrique Nobre
Coelho, Antônio Carlos
author_role author
author2 Parente, Paulo Henrique Nobre
Coelho, Antônio Carlos
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinho, Gledstone Alves
Parente, Paulo Henrique Nobre
Coelho, Antônio Carlos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Risco
Evidenciação
Instrumentos financeiros
Risk
Disclosure
Financial instruments
topic Risco
Evidenciação
Instrumentos financeiros
Risk
Disclosure
Financial instruments
description The study aims to analyze the connection between mandatory disclosure level of risks arising from financial instruments and the extent of Brazilian public companies risk under the hypothesis that highest disclosure implies lower risk of perception by investors. The sample was composed by BM&FBovespa public companies best traded, limited to the 42 that released the information demanded by the research. The disclosure level was estimated by index based on CVM Resolution 684/12 requirements. The perception of risk was measured by Financial Leverage Ratio, Value-at-Risk and Sharpe Ratio. The mandatory disclosure was accomplished, on average, by 61% of firms, despite their report obligation. Recommended qualitative information was disclosed more frequently than required quantitative assessments. By multiple linear regression estimated by OLS, we were able to reject the formulated hypothesis, highlighting the larger impact on indexes in firms with high levels of derivatives and financial instruments utilization. This study may contribute to explain the connection among financial instruments disclosure and company risk perception, providing the investors and regulators with evidences that the market faces low level of financial instruments disclosure, and this can contribute to affect firms’ perception of risk level by investors.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/article/view/56823
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/article/view/56823
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ConTexto/article/view/56823/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 ConTexto
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 ConTexto
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ConTexto - Contabilidade em Texto; v. 16 n. 33 (2016): maio/ago. 2016; 58-73
2175-8751
1676-6016
reponame:ConTexto
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str ConTexto
collection ConTexto
repository.name.fl_str_mv ConTexto - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv fernanda.momo@ufrgs.br||contexto@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1799766349852966912