SETTLEMENT COLONIES X EXPLOITATION COLONIES: FROM HEEREN TO ACEMOGLU
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Análise Econômica (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/AnaliseEconomica/article/view/71287 |
Resumo: | The paper compares various forms of the thesis which states that the type of colonization determines or shapes the fate of societies. Smith (1776) already presented this proposition and a typology of colonies. Yet the German authors Heeren (1817) and Roscher (1856) were responsible for the elaboration of the thesis. These historians influenced the economist Leroy-Beaulieu (1902). And it was from this French economist that Caio Prado Júnior took the thesis “settlement colony versus exploitation colony” and applied it to the Brazilian history. In the United States, the idea reappears in the works of North (1955, 1959) and Baldwin (1956). More recently, economic historians Engerman and Sokoloff (1997) elaborated on the issue but without reference to European authors. Finally, Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson (2001, 2002) spread the thesis to a wider academic audience and presented econometric evidences. The paper concludes that the academic success of the thesis stems from its flexibility. Market-friendly analysts can attribute economic development to the quality of institutions associated with settlement colonies, while the more critical ones emphasize the spoiling character of the colonies of exploitation. |
id |
UFRGS-24_7fb46129b0aabdeea4d3543f636076c3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/71287 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-24 |
network_name_str |
Análise Econômica (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
SETTLEMENT COLONIES X EXPLOITATION COLONIES: FROM HEEREN TO ACEMOGLUCOLÔNIAS DE POVOAMENTO VERSUS COLÔNIAS DE EXPLORAÇÃO: DE HEEREN A ACEMOGLUColonizaçãoColônia de povoamentoColônia de exploraçãoB00N01ImmigrationSettlementsExtractive coloniesB00N01The paper compares various forms of the thesis which states that the type of colonization determines or shapes the fate of societies. Smith (1776) already presented this proposition and a typology of colonies. Yet the German authors Heeren (1817) and Roscher (1856) were responsible for the elaboration of the thesis. These historians influenced the economist Leroy-Beaulieu (1902). And it was from this French economist that Caio Prado Júnior took the thesis “settlement colony versus exploitation colony” and applied it to the Brazilian history. In the United States, the idea reappears in the works of North (1955, 1959) and Baldwin (1956). More recently, economic historians Engerman and Sokoloff (1997) elaborated on the issue but without reference to European authors. Finally, Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson (2001, 2002) spread the thesis to a wider academic audience and presented econometric evidences. The paper concludes that the academic success of the thesis stems from its flexibility. Market-friendly analysts can attribute economic development to the quality of institutions associated with settlement colonies, while the more critical ones emphasize the spoiling character of the colonies of exploitation.Este trabalho apresenta a evolução da tese de que o tipo de colonização inicial determina, ou condiciona, o futuro das sociedades. Smith (1776) já apresentava essa proposição e uma tipologia das colônias. Contudo, foram os autores alemães Heeren (1817) e Roscher (1856) os responsáveis pelo desenvolvimento da tese. Esses historiadores influenciaram o economista Leroy-Beaulieu (1902). E foi a partir desse economista francês que Caio Prado Júnior se baseou para aplicar a tese “colônia de povoamento versus colônia de exploração” ao caso brasileiro. Já nos Estados Unidos, a ideia ressurge nas obras de North (1955, 1959) e de Baldwin (1956). Mais recentemente, os historiadores econômicos Engerman e Sokoloff (1997) aprofundaram a questão, sem fazer referência aos autores europeus. Finalmente, Acemoglu, Johnson e Robinson (2001, 2002) levaram a tese para um público acadêmico mais amplo e apresentaram evidências econométricas. O trabalho conclui que o sucesso acadêmico da tese em questão decorre de sua flexibilidade. Os analistas favoráveis à economia de mercado podem atribuir o desenvolvimento econômico à qualidade institucional associada às colônias de povoamento. Já os mais críticos enfatizam o caráter espoliador das colônias de exploração.UFRGS2019-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/AnaliseEconomica/article/view/7128710.22456/2176-5456.71287Análise Econômica; Vol. 37 No. 72 (2019): Março 2019Análise Econômica; v. 37 n. 72 (2019): Março 20192176-54560102-9924reponame:Análise Econômica (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/AnaliseEconomica/article/view/71287/52466Copyright (c) 2019 Análise Econômicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMonasterio, LeonardoEhrl, Philipp2019-04-11T19:05:27Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/71287Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/AnaliseEconomicaPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/AnaliseEconomica/oai||rae@ufrgs.br2176-54560102-9924opendoar:2019-04-11T19:05:27Análise Econômica (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
SETTLEMENT COLONIES X EXPLOITATION COLONIES: FROM HEEREN TO ACEMOGLU COLÔNIAS DE POVOAMENTO VERSUS COLÔNIAS DE EXPLORAÇÃO: DE HEEREN A ACEMOGLU |
title |
SETTLEMENT COLONIES X EXPLOITATION COLONIES: FROM HEEREN TO ACEMOGLU |
spellingShingle |
SETTLEMENT COLONIES X EXPLOITATION COLONIES: FROM HEEREN TO ACEMOGLU Monasterio, Leonardo Colonização Colônia de povoamento Colônia de exploração B00 N01 Immigration Settlements Extractive colonies B00 N01 |
title_short |
SETTLEMENT COLONIES X EXPLOITATION COLONIES: FROM HEEREN TO ACEMOGLU |
title_full |
SETTLEMENT COLONIES X EXPLOITATION COLONIES: FROM HEEREN TO ACEMOGLU |
title_fullStr |
SETTLEMENT COLONIES X EXPLOITATION COLONIES: FROM HEEREN TO ACEMOGLU |
title_full_unstemmed |
SETTLEMENT COLONIES X EXPLOITATION COLONIES: FROM HEEREN TO ACEMOGLU |
title_sort |
SETTLEMENT COLONIES X EXPLOITATION COLONIES: FROM HEEREN TO ACEMOGLU |
author |
Monasterio, Leonardo |
author_facet |
Monasterio, Leonardo Ehrl, Philipp |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ehrl, Philipp |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Monasterio, Leonardo Ehrl, Philipp |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Colonização Colônia de povoamento Colônia de exploração B00 N01 Immigration Settlements Extractive colonies B00 N01 |
topic |
Colonização Colônia de povoamento Colônia de exploração B00 N01 Immigration Settlements Extractive colonies B00 N01 |
description |
The paper compares various forms of the thesis which states that the type of colonization determines or shapes the fate of societies. Smith (1776) already presented this proposition and a typology of colonies. Yet the German authors Heeren (1817) and Roscher (1856) were responsible for the elaboration of the thesis. These historians influenced the economist Leroy-Beaulieu (1902). And it was from this French economist that Caio Prado Júnior took the thesis “settlement colony versus exploitation colony” and applied it to the Brazilian history. In the United States, the idea reappears in the works of North (1955, 1959) and Baldwin (1956). More recently, economic historians Engerman and Sokoloff (1997) elaborated on the issue but without reference to European authors. Finally, Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson (2001, 2002) spread the thesis to a wider academic audience and presented econometric evidences. The paper concludes that the academic success of the thesis stems from its flexibility. Market-friendly analysts can attribute economic development to the quality of institutions associated with settlement colonies, while the more critical ones emphasize the spoiling character of the colonies of exploitation. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/AnaliseEconomica/article/view/71287 10.22456/2176-5456.71287 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/AnaliseEconomica/article/view/71287 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22456/2176-5456.71287 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/AnaliseEconomica/article/view/71287/52466 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Análise Econômica info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Análise Econômica |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRGS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRGS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Análise Econômica; Vol. 37 No. 72 (2019): Março 2019 Análise Econômica; v. 37 n. 72 (2019): Março 2019 2176-5456 0102-9924 reponame:Análise Econômica (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Análise Econômica (Online) |
collection |
Análise Econômica (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Análise Econômica (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rae@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1799766268034678784 |