Everyday alliances and democratic actions:: Marcel Mauss, Robert Putnam and the bases of consensual agreements

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Eduardo Moura
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Debates
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/125719
Resumo: This article analyzes the theoretical performance of the classic essay by Marcel Mauss in the discussion about the idea of ​​citizenship in Robert Putnam. Authors focused on thinking about the non-formally expressed foundations of the contract and their assumptions go back to the seminal debate in the social sciences about obligatoriness versus spontaneity. Associated with studies on citizenship, in Making democracy work, Putnam investigates the different degrees of civic engagement and its relationship with government practices, a variable capable of indicating the quality of democratic regimes through a system of benefits. In terms of this debate, it is worth exploring, through a bibliographic review, how the essay The gift contributes to the understanding of the role of culture in the performance of democracies. We consider the hypothesis of the dialogue between these two versions of the alliance in everyday action and its fecundity in studies on the way in which individuals experience rules in modern democracies. It is an effort of dialogue between the fields of anthropology and political science, specifically the debate on engagement in public life.
id UFRGS-26_149891afc185376a6daa77edfd25bb08
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/125719
network_acronym_str UFRGS-26
network_name_str Revista Debates
repository_id_str
spelling Everyday alliances and democratic actions:: Marcel Mauss, Robert Putnam and the bases of consensual agreementsAlianzas cotidianas y acciones democráticas:: Marcel Mauss, Robert Putnam y las bases de los acuerdos consensuadosAlianças cotidianas e ações democráticas:: Marcel Mauss, Robert Putnam e as bases dos acordos consensuais This article analyzes the theoretical performance of the classic essay by Marcel Mauss in the discussion about the idea of ​​citizenship in Robert Putnam. Authors focused on thinking about the non-formally expressed foundations of the contract and their assumptions go back to the seminal debate in the social sciences about obligatoriness versus spontaneity. Associated with studies on citizenship, in Making democracy work, Putnam investigates the different degrees of civic engagement and its relationship with government practices, a variable capable of indicating the quality of democratic regimes through a system of benefits. In terms of this debate, it is worth exploring, through a bibliographic review, how the essay The gift contributes to the understanding of the role of culture in the performance of democracies. We consider the hypothesis of the dialogue between these two versions of the alliance in everyday action and its fecundity in studies on the way in which individuals experience rules in modern democracies. It is an effort of dialogue between the fields of anthropology and political science, specifically the debate on engagement in public life.Este artículo analiza la actuación teórica del ensayo clásico de Marcel Mauss en la discusión sobre la idea de ciudadanía en Robert Putnam. Autores centrados en pensar los fundamentos del contrato no expresados ​​formalmente, sus supuestos se remontan al debate seminal en las ciencias sociales sobre la obligatoriedad versus la espontaneidad. Asociado a los estudios sobre ciudadanía, Putnam investiga la participación cívica de los individuos y sus efectos en las prácticas de gobierno, variable capaz de indicar la calidad de las democracias. Por lo tanto, vale la pena explorar la contribución de Mauss para comprender el papel de la cultura en el desempeño de las instituciones democráticas. Consideramos la hipótesis del diálogo entre estas dos versiones de la alianza en la acción cotidiana y su fecundidad en estudios sobre la forma en que los individuos experimentan el dominio en las democracias modernas. Es un esfuerzo de diálogo entre los campos de la antropología y la ciencia política, específicamente el debate sobre el compromiso en la vida pública.Este artigo analisa o rendimento teórico do clássico ensaio de Marcel Mauss na discussão a respeito da ideia de cidadania em Robert Putnam. Autores concentrados em pensar os fundamentos não formalmente expressos do contrato, seus pressupostos remontam ao debate seminal nas ciências sociais sobre obrigatoriedade versus espontaneidade. Associado aos estudos sobre cidadania, em Comunidade e democracia, Putnam investiga os diferentes graus de engajamento cívico e sua relação com as práticas governamentais, variável capaz de indicar a qualidade dos regimes democráticos pela via de um sistema de prestações. No plano desse debate, cabe explorar, através da revisão bibliográfica, como o Ensaio sobre a dádiva contribui para a compreensão do papel da cultura no desempenho das democracias. Consideramos a hipótese do diálogo entre essas duas versões da aliança na ação cotidiana e sua fecundidade aos estudos sobre o modo pelo qual os indivíduos vivenciam a regra nas democracias modernas. Trata-se de um esforço de interlocução entre os campos da antropologia e da ciência política, em específico o debate sobre o engajamento na vida pública.     UFRGS2023-04-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/12571910.22456/1982-5269.125719Revista Debates; Vol. 17 Núm. 1 (2023): La Tercera Ola de "Autocratización": Formas, Modalidades, Ritmos y Estrategias; 162-183Revista Debates; v. 17 n. 1 (2023): A Terceira Onda de “Autocratização": Formas, Modalidades, Ritmos e Estratégias; 162-1831982-52692236-479Xreponame:Revista Debatesinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/125719/88530Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Debatesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Eduardo Moura2023-04-29T00:09:25Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/125719Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debatesPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debates/oai1982-52692236-479Xopendoar:2023-04-29T00:09:25Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Everyday alliances and democratic actions:: Marcel Mauss, Robert Putnam and the bases of consensual agreements
Alianzas cotidianas y acciones democráticas:: Marcel Mauss, Robert Putnam y las bases de los acuerdos consensuados
Alianças cotidianas e ações democráticas:: Marcel Mauss, Robert Putnam e as bases dos acordos consensuais
title Everyday alliances and democratic actions:: Marcel Mauss, Robert Putnam and the bases of consensual agreements
spellingShingle Everyday alliances and democratic actions:: Marcel Mauss, Robert Putnam and the bases of consensual agreements
Oliveira, Eduardo Moura
title_short Everyday alliances and democratic actions:: Marcel Mauss, Robert Putnam and the bases of consensual agreements
title_full Everyday alliances and democratic actions:: Marcel Mauss, Robert Putnam and the bases of consensual agreements
title_fullStr Everyday alliances and democratic actions:: Marcel Mauss, Robert Putnam and the bases of consensual agreements
title_full_unstemmed Everyday alliances and democratic actions:: Marcel Mauss, Robert Putnam and the bases of consensual agreements
title_sort Everyday alliances and democratic actions:: Marcel Mauss, Robert Putnam and the bases of consensual agreements
author Oliveira, Eduardo Moura
author_facet Oliveira, Eduardo Moura
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Eduardo Moura
description This article analyzes the theoretical performance of the classic essay by Marcel Mauss in the discussion about the idea of ​​citizenship in Robert Putnam. Authors focused on thinking about the non-formally expressed foundations of the contract and their assumptions go back to the seminal debate in the social sciences about obligatoriness versus spontaneity. Associated with studies on citizenship, in Making democracy work, Putnam investigates the different degrees of civic engagement and its relationship with government practices, a variable capable of indicating the quality of democratic regimes through a system of benefits. In terms of this debate, it is worth exploring, through a bibliographic review, how the essay The gift contributes to the understanding of the role of culture in the performance of democracies. We consider the hypothesis of the dialogue between these two versions of the alliance in everyday action and its fecundity in studies on the way in which individuals experience rules in modern democracies. It is an effort of dialogue between the fields of anthropology and political science, specifically the debate on engagement in public life.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-04-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/125719
10.22456/1982-5269.125719
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/125719
identifier_str_mv 10.22456/1982-5269.125719
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/125719/88530
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Debates
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Debates
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Debates; Vol. 17 Núm. 1 (2023): La Tercera Ola de "Autocratización": Formas, Modalidades, Ritmos y Estrategias; 162-183
Revista Debates; v. 17 n. 1 (2023): A Terceira Onda de “Autocratização": Formas, Modalidades, Ritmos e Estratégias; 162-183
1982-5269
2236-479X
reponame:Revista Debates
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Revista Debates
collection Revista Debates
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808845563429388288