Multinationals of Law, law and pro bono offices: elements for a comparative analysis of the French and American legal fields

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bosvieux-Onyekwelu, Charles
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Debates
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/85788
Resumo: Through a comparison of the United States and France, this article analyses the national nature of the juridical field with a focus on pro bono juridical work in multinational law firms and in French law offices. In this perspective, it is concerned with the legal conditions in which law practices and norms can be transplanted from one country to the other (legal transplant). The research initiated with a series of interviews with law professionals in the sector and with the direct observation of interactions between suppliers and receivers of pro bono activities. The first conclusions indicate that most French law offices do not possess the human and financial means to institutionalize pro bono work with the amplitude of a real public action instrument.
id UFRGS-26_2f21dbb4cde01f910a1333580981f77a
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/85788
network_acronym_str UFRGS-26
network_name_str Revista Debates
repository_id_str
spelling Multinationals of Law, law and pro bono offices: elements for a comparative analysis of the French and American legal fieldsMultinacionales del Derecho, bufetes de abogados y pro bono: elementos para un análisis comparativo de los campos jurídicos francés y americanoMultinacionais do Direito, escritórios de advocacia e pro bono: elementos para uma análise comparativa dos campos jurídicos francês e americanoPro bonoAdvogadosMultinacionais do DireitoMundialização.Pro BonoLawyersMultinational Law FirmsMundialization.Pro bonoAbogadosMultinacionales del DerechoGlobalización.Through a comparison of the United States and France, this article analyses the national nature of the juridical field with a focus on pro bono juridical work in multinational law firms and in French law offices. In this perspective, it is concerned with the legal conditions in which law practices and norms can be transplanted from one country to the other (legal transplant). The research initiated with a series of interviews with law professionals in the sector and with the direct observation of interactions between suppliers and receivers of pro bono activities. The first conclusions indicate that most French law offices do not possess the human and financial means to institutionalize pro bono work with the amplitude of a real public action instrument.A partir de la comparación de Estados Unidos y Francia, el artículo problematiza la naturaleza nacional del campo jurídico teniendo como foco la abogacía pro bono en las multinacionales del Derecho y en las bufetes de abogados franceses. En esa perspectiva, se pregunta cuáles son las condiciones en que prácticas y normas jurídicas pueden ser trasplantadas de un país a otro (legal tranplant). La investigación realizada inició por una serie de entrevistas con abogados de este sector y con la observación directa de interacciones entre prestadores y destinatarios de las actividades pro bono. Las primeras conclusiones indican que la mayoría de las oficinas francesas no tienen medios humanos y financieros para institucionalizar el pro bono con la amplitud de un verdadero dispositivo de acción pública.A partir da comparação dos Estados Unidos e da França, o artigo problematiza a natureza nacional do campo jurídico tendo como foco a advocacia pro bono nas multinacionais do Direito e nos escritórios de advocacia franceses. Nessa perspectiva, se pergunta quais as condições em que práticas e normas jurídicas podem ser transplantadas de um país para outro (legal tranplant). A pesquisa realizada iniciou por uma série de entrevistas com advogados deste setor e com a observação direta de interações entre prestadores e destinatários das atividades pro bono. As primeiras conclusões indicam que a maioria dos escritórios franceses não têm meios humanos e financeiros para institucionalizar o pro bono com a amplitude de um verdadeiro dispositivo de ação pública.UFRGS2018-12-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/8578810.22456/1982-5269.85788Revista Debates; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2018); 33-52Revista Debates; v. 12 n. 3 (2018); 33-521982-52692236-479Xreponame:Revista Debatesinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/85788/50954Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Debatesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBosvieux-Onyekwelu, Charles2018-12-14T15:55:04Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/85788Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debatesPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debates/oai1982-52692236-479Xopendoar:2018-12-14T15:55:04Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Multinationals of Law, law and pro bono offices: elements for a comparative analysis of the French and American legal fields
Multinacionales del Derecho, bufetes de abogados y pro bono: elementos para un análisis comparativo de los campos jurídicos francés y americano
Multinacionais do Direito, escritórios de advocacia e pro bono: elementos para uma análise comparativa dos campos jurídicos francês e americano
title Multinationals of Law, law and pro bono offices: elements for a comparative analysis of the French and American legal fields
spellingShingle Multinationals of Law, law and pro bono offices: elements for a comparative analysis of the French and American legal fields
Bosvieux-Onyekwelu, Charles
Pro bono
Advogados
Multinacionais do Direito
Mundialização.
Pro Bono
Lawyers
Multinational Law Firms
Mundialization.
Pro bono
Abogados
Multinacionales del Derecho
Globalización.
title_short Multinationals of Law, law and pro bono offices: elements for a comparative analysis of the French and American legal fields
title_full Multinationals of Law, law and pro bono offices: elements for a comparative analysis of the French and American legal fields
title_fullStr Multinationals of Law, law and pro bono offices: elements for a comparative analysis of the French and American legal fields
title_full_unstemmed Multinationals of Law, law and pro bono offices: elements for a comparative analysis of the French and American legal fields
title_sort Multinationals of Law, law and pro bono offices: elements for a comparative analysis of the French and American legal fields
author Bosvieux-Onyekwelu, Charles
author_facet Bosvieux-Onyekwelu, Charles
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bosvieux-Onyekwelu, Charles
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pro bono
Advogados
Multinacionais do Direito
Mundialização.
Pro Bono
Lawyers
Multinational Law Firms
Mundialization.
Pro bono
Abogados
Multinacionales del Derecho
Globalización.
topic Pro bono
Advogados
Multinacionais do Direito
Mundialização.
Pro Bono
Lawyers
Multinational Law Firms
Mundialization.
Pro bono
Abogados
Multinacionales del Derecho
Globalización.
description Through a comparison of the United States and France, this article analyses the national nature of the juridical field with a focus on pro bono juridical work in multinational law firms and in French law offices. In this perspective, it is concerned with the legal conditions in which law practices and norms can be transplanted from one country to the other (legal transplant). The research initiated with a series of interviews with law professionals in the sector and with the direct observation of interactions between suppliers and receivers of pro bono activities. The first conclusions indicate that most French law offices do not possess the human and financial means to institutionalize pro bono work with the amplitude of a real public action instrument.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/85788
10.22456/1982-5269.85788
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/85788
identifier_str_mv 10.22456/1982-5269.85788
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/85788/50954
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Debates
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Debates
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Debates; Vol. 12 Núm. 3 (2018); 33-52
Revista Debates; v. 12 n. 3 (2018); 33-52
1982-5269
2236-479X
reponame:Revista Debates
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Revista Debates
collection Revista Debates
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808845566372741120

Registros relacionados