Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Debates |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/77346 |
Resumo: | The analyses of the political and social dimension existent in the theory of development, considering ECLAC structuralism in its first generation (1948-1960) are marked by the interpretation of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría. We put in discussion theses and projects of these two thinkers, trying to analyze how authors with such different methods converged in the same sphere of development/underdevelopment debate, which is politics, with the privilege of the theme democracy, and the analysis of social structures. We aim to understand the similarities and differences that are found in these two authors, first, in what refers to the expansion of the idea of development beyond the economic dimension and, secondly, in the proposition of democratic planning as a strategy to overcome underdevelopment. The analysis proceeded on productions of the 1950s and 1960s, in order to demonstrate the novelty of this enlarged development dimension present in these authors. |
id |
UFRGS-26_54a4043319508a4c33e9611849a46828 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/77346 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-26 |
network_name_str |
Revista Debates |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina EchavarríaPolítica y sociedad en la primera generación cepalina: la teoría del desarrollo de Celso Furtado y José Medina EchavarríaPolítica e sociedade na primeira geração cepalina: a teoria do desenvolvimento de Celso Furtado e José Medina EchavarríaCEPALCelso FurtadoJosé Medina EchavarríaTeoria do desenvolvimentoPensamento político.ECLACCelso FurtadoJosé Medina EchavarríaTheory of DevelopmentPolitical Thinking.CEPALCelso FurtadoJosé Medina EchavarríaTeoría del DesarrolloPensamiento Político.The analyses of the political and social dimension existent in the theory of development, considering ECLAC structuralism in its first generation (1948-1960) are marked by the interpretation of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría. We put in discussion theses and projects of these two thinkers, trying to analyze how authors with such different methods converged in the same sphere of development/underdevelopment debate, which is politics, with the privilege of the theme democracy, and the analysis of social structures. We aim to understand the similarities and differences that are found in these two authors, first, in what refers to the expansion of the idea of development beyond the economic dimension and, secondly, in the proposition of democratic planning as a strategy to overcome underdevelopment. The analysis proceeded on productions of the 1950s and 1960s, in order to demonstrate the novelty of this enlarged development dimension present in these authors.Los análisis de la dimensión política y social presentes en la teoría del desarrollo del estructuralismo cepalino, en su primera generación (1948-1960), están marcadas por las interpretaciones de Celso Furtado y José Medina Echavarría. En este sentido, el análisis de las estructuras sociales y de las políticas sociales, que se basan en el análisis de las estructuras sociales. Deseamos comprender las semejanzas y diferencias encontradas en estos dos autores, primero, en lo que remite a la ampliación de la idea de desarrollo más allá de la dimensión económica y, segundo, en la proposición del planeamiento democrático como estrategia de superación del subdesarrollo. El análisis realizado fue de las producciones de las décadas de 1950 y 1960, para demostrar el inedito de esta dimensión ampliada del desarrollo presente en estos autores.As análises da dimensão política e social presentes na teoria do desenvolvimento do estruturalismo cepalino, em sua primeira geração (1948-1960), estão marcadas pelas interpretações de Celso Furtado e José Medina Echavarría. Colocamos em questão as teses e projetos destes dois pensadores, buscando analisar como autores com diferentes métodos convergiram em uma mesma esfera de debate sobre o desenvolvimento/subdesenvolvimento, que é a política, com o privilégio do tema da democracia, e a análise das estruturas sociais. Desejamos compreender as semelhanças e diferenças encontradas nestes dois autores, primeiro, no que remete à ampliação da ideia de desenvolvimento para além da dimensão econômica e, segundo, na proposição do planejamento democrático como estratégia de superação do subdesenvolvimento. A análise realizada foi das produções das décadas de 1950 e 1960, de modo a demonstrar o ineditismo desta dimensão ampliada do desenvolvimento presente nestes autores.UFRGS2017-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Históricaapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/7734610.22456/1982-5269.77346Revista Debates; Vol. 11 Núm. 3 (2017): Dossiê Economia, Política e Corrupção na América Latina; 79-100Revista Debates; v. 11 n. 3 (2017): Dossiê Economia, Política e Corrupção na América Latina; 79-1001982-52692236-479Xreponame:Revista Debatesinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/77346/45749Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Debatesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinto, Gustavo Louis Henrique2017-12-20T13:46:03Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/77346Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debatesPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debates/oai1982-52692236-479Xopendoar:2017-12-20T13:46:03Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría Política y sociedad en la primera generación cepalina: la teoría del desarrollo de Celso Furtado y José Medina Echavarría Política e sociedade na primeira geração cepalina: a teoria do desenvolvimento de Celso Furtado e José Medina Echavarría |
title |
Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría |
spellingShingle |
Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría Pinto, Gustavo Louis Henrique CEPAL Celso Furtado José Medina Echavarría Teoria do desenvolvimento Pensamento político. ECLAC Celso Furtado José Medina Echavarría Theory of Development Political Thinking. CEPAL Celso Furtado José Medina Echavarría Teoría del Desarrollo Pensamiento Político. |
title_short |
Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría |
title_full |
Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría |
title_fullStr |
Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría |
title_full_unstemmed |
Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría |
title_sort |
Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría |
author |
Pinto, Gustavo Louis Henrique |
author_facet |
Pinto, Gustavo Louis Henrique |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pinto, Gustavo Louis Henrique |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
CEPAL Celso Furtado José Medina Echavarría Teoria do desenvolvimento Pensamento político. ECLAC Celso Furtado José Medina Echavarría Theory of Development Political Thinking. CEPAL Celso Furtado José Medina Echavarría Teoría del Desarrollo Pensamiento Político. |
topic |
CEPAL Celso Furtado José Medina Echavarría Teoria do desenvolvimento Pensamento político. ECLAC Celso Furtado José Medina Echavarría Theory of Development Political Thinking. CEPAL Celso Furtado José Medina Echavarría Teoría del Desarrollo Pensamiento Político. |
description |
The analyses of the political and social dimension existent in the theory of development, considering ECLAC structuralism in its first generation (1948-1960) are marked by the interpretation of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría. We put in discussion theses and projects of these two thinkers, trying to analyze how authors with such different methods converged in the same sphere of development/underdevelopment debate, which is politics, with the privilege of the theme democracy, and the analysis of social structures. We aim to understand the similarities and differences that are found in these two authors, first, in what refers to the expansion of the idea of development beyond the economic dimension and, secondly, in the proposition of democratic planning as a strategy to overcome underdevelopment. The analysis proceeded on productions of the 1950s and 1960s, in order to demonstrate the novelty of this enlarged development dimension present in these authors. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Pesquisa Histórica |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/77346 10.22456/1982-5269.77346 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/77346 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22456/1982-5269.77346 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/77346/45749 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Debates info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Debates |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRGS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRGS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Debates; Vol. 11 Núm. 3 (2017): Dossiê Economia, Política e Corrupção na América Latina; 79-100 Revista Debates; v. 11 n. 3 (2017): Dossiê Economia, Política e Corrupção na América Latina; 79-100 1982-5269 2236-479X reponame:Revista Debates instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Revista Debates |
collection |
Revista Debates |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1798045815753670656 |