Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pinto, Gustavo Louis Henrique
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Debates
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/77346
Resumo: The analyses of the political and social dimension existent in the theory of development, considering ECLAC structuralism in its first generation (1948-1960) are marked by the interpretation of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría. We put in discussion theses and projects of these two thinkers, trying to analyze how authors with such different methods converged in the same sphere of development/underdevelopment debate, which is politics, with the privilege of the theme democracy, and the analysis of social structures. We aim to understand the similarities and differences that are found in these two authors, first, in what refers to the expansion of the idea of development beyond the economic dimension and, secondly, in the proposition of democratic planning as a strategy to overcome underdevelopment. The analysis proceeded on productions of the 1950s and 1960s, in order to demonstrate the novelty of this enlarged development dimension present in these authors.
id UFRGS-26_54a4043319508a4c33e9611849a46828
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/77346
network_acronym_str UFRGS-26
network_name_str Revista Debates
repository_id_str
spelling Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina EchavarríaPolítica y sociedad en la primera generación cepalina: la teoría del desarrollo de Celso Furtado y José Medina EchavarríaPolítica e sociedade na primeira geração cepalina: a teoria do desenvolvimento de Celso Furtado e José Medina EchavarríaCEPALCelso FurtadoJosé Medina EchavarríaTeoria do desenvolvimentoPensamento político.ECLACCelso FurtadoJosé Medina EchavarríaTheory of DevelopmentPolitical Thinking.CEPALCelso FurtadoJosé Medina EchavarríaTeoría del DesarrolloPensamiento Político.The analyses of the political and social dimension existent in the theory of development, considering ECLAC structuralism in its first generation (1948-1960) are marked by the interpretation of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría. We put in discussion theses and projects of these two thinkers, trying to analyze how authors with such different methods converged in the same sphere of development/underdevelopment debate, which is politics, with the privilege of the theme democracy, and the analysis of social structures. We aim to understand the similarities and differences that are found in these two authors, first, in what refers to the expansion of the idea of development beyond the economic dimension and, secondly, in the proposition of democratic planning as a strategy to overcome underdevelopment. The analysis proceeded on productions of the 1950s and 1960s, in order to demonstrate the novelty of this enlarged development dimension present in these authors.Los análisis de la dimensión política y social presentes en la teoría del desarrollo del estructuralismo cepalino, en su primera generación (1948-1960), están marcadas por las interpretaciones de Celso Furtado y José Medina Echavarría. En este sentido, el análisis de las estructuras sociales y de las políticas sociales, que se basan en el análisis de las estructuras sociales. Deseamos comprender las semejanzas y diferencias encontradas en estos dos autores, primero, en lo que remite a la ampliación de la idea de desarrollo más allá de la dimensión económica y, segundo, en la proposición del planeamiento democrático como estrategia de superación del subdesarrollo. El análisis realizado fue de las producciones de las décadas de 1950 y 1960, para demostrar el inedito de esta dimensión ampliada del desarrollo presente en estos autores.As análises da dimensão política e social presentes na teoria do desenvolvimento do estruturalismo cepalino, em sua primeira geração (1948-1960), estão marcadas pelas interpretações de Celso Furtado e José Medina Echavarría. Colocamos em questão as teses e projetos destes dois pensadores, buscando analisar como autores com diferentes métodos convergiram em uma mesma esfera de debate sobre o desenvolvimento/subdesenvolvimento, que é a política, com o privilégio do tema da democracia, e a análise das estruturas sociais. Desejamos compreender as semelhanças e diferenças encontradas nestes dois autores, primeiro, no que remete à ampliação da ideia de desenvolvimento para além da dimensão econômica e, segundo, na proposição do planejamento democrático como estratégia de superação do subdesenvolvimento. A análise realizada foi das produções das décadas de 1950 e 1960, de modo a demonstrar o ineditismo desta dimensão ampliada do desenvolvimento presente nestes autores.UFRGS2017-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Históricaapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/7734610.22456/1982-5269.77346Revista Debates; Vol. 11 Núm. 3 (2017): Dossiê Economia, Política e Corrupção na América Latina; 79-100Revista Debates; v. 11 n. 3 (2017): Dossiê Economia, Política e Corrupção na América Latina; 79-1001982-52692236-479Xreponame:Revista Debatesinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/77346/45749Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Debatesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPinto, Gustavo Louis Henrique2017-12-20T13:46:03Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/77346Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debatesPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debates/oai1982-52692236-479Xopendoar:2017-12-20T13:46:03Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría
Política y sociedad en la primera generación cepalina: la teoría del desarrollo de Celso Furtado y José Medina Echavarría
Política e sociedade na primeira geração cepalina: a teoria do desenvolvimento de Celso Furtado e José Medina Echavarría
title Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría
spellingShingle Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría
Pinto, Gustavo Louis Henrique
CEPAL
Celso Furtado
José Medina Echavarría
Teoria do desenvolvimento
Pensamento político.
ECLAC
Celso Furtado
José Medina Echavarría
Theory of Development
Political Thinking.
CEPAL
Celso Furtado
José Medina Echavarría
Teoría del Desarrollo
Pensamiento Político.
title_short Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría
title_full Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría
title_fullStr Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría
title_full_unstemmed Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría
title_sort Politics and society in the first eclac generation: the development theory of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría
author Pinto, Gustavo Louis Henrique
author_facet Pinto, Gustavo Louis Henrique
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pinto, Gustavo Louis Henrique
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv CEPAL
Celso Furtado
José Medina Echavarría
Teoria do desenvolvimento
Pensamento político.
ECLAC
Celso Furtado
José Medina Echavarría
Theory of Development
Political Thinking.
CEPAL
Celso Furtado
José Medina Echavarría
Teoría del Desarrollo
Pensamiento Político.
topic CEPAL
Celso Furtado
José Medina Echavarría
Teoria do desenvolvimento
Pensamento político.
ECLAC
Celso Furtado
José Medina Echavarría
Theory of Development
Political Thinking.
CEPAL
Celso Furtado
José Medina Echavarría
Teoría del Desarrollo
Pensamiento Político.
description The analyses of the political and social dimension existent in the theory of development, considering ECLAC structuralism in its first generation (1948-1960) are marked by the interpretation of Celso Furtado and José Medina Echavarría. We put in discussion theses and projects of these two thinkers, trying to analyze how authors with such different methods converged in the same sphere of development/underdevelopment debate, which is politics, with the privilege of the theme democracy, and the analysis of social structures. We aim to understand the similarities and differences that are found in these two authors, first, in what refers to the expansion of the idea of development beyond the economic dimension and, secondly, in the proposition of democratic planning as a strategy to overcome underdevelopment. The analysis proceeded on productions of the 1950s and 1960s, in order to demonstrate the novelty of this enlarged development dimension present in these authors.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa Histórica
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/77346
10.22456/1982-5269.77346
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/77346
identifier_str_mv 10.22456/1982-5269.77346
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/77346/45749
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Debates
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Debates
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Debates; Vol. 11 Núm. 3 (2017): Dossiê Economia, Política e Corrupção na América Latina; 79-100
Revista Debates; v. 11 n. 3 (2017): Dossiê Economia, Política e Corrupção na América Latina; 79-100
1982-5269
2236-479X
reponame:Revista Debates
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Revista Debates
collection Revista Debates
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798045815753670656