VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Debates |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/2595 |
Resumo: | The article looks at a partial selection of the many rights claimed by citizens in contemporary democracies in the context of the justice system, citizen security, gender, youths, and access to information – and presents the argument that that democratic “rights” are not a homogeneous reality as posited by liberal theory, but a complex, multilayered one. In new “low quality” democracies, rights volatility presents a special challenge to universality. Social mapping of the range and distribution of bankable rights is likely to uncover a reality that falls well short of the rhetoric of universalism. In highly fragmented and unequal societies, the rhetoric of universality is unlikely to translate easily into genuine evenness of application. And accompanying variability there may be instability or volatility over time. This combination in societies where the “duties” corresponding to rights are not securely internalised, is liable to produce patterns of political behaviour that deviate substantially from the interlocking mutuality of interest postulated by classical liberalism. “Contentious” political cycles of resistance and exclusion, and struggles to reshape the rules of the game (rather than merely to live within them) seem to be natural correlates of this climate of uncertainty. This is particularly so in new democracies, where sudden explosions of rights claims and multiplying rights claimants can easily generate an atmosphere of rights inflation can raise expectations well beyond what is reliably deliverable. |
id |
UFRGS-26_5b9423b6561004db9afc749348fb3be0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/2595 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-26 |
network_name_str |
Revista Debates |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVErights instability and volatilitynew democracieslow quality democracycitizenshipcontentious politicsrights instability and volatilitynew democracieslow quality democracycitizenshipcontentious politicsThe article looks at a partial selection of the many rights claimed by citizens in contemporary democracies in the context of the justice system, citizen security, gender, youths, and access to information – and presents the argument that that democratic “rights” are not a homogeneous reality as posited by liberal theory, but a complex, multilayered one. In new “low quality” democracies, rights volatility presents a special challenge to universality. Social mapping of the range and distribution of bankable rights is likely to uncover a reality that falls well short of the rhetoric of universalism. In highly fragmented and unequal societies, the rhetoric of universality is unlikely to translate easily into genuine evenness of application. And accompanying variability there may be instability or volatility over time. This combination in societies where the “duties” corresponding to rights are not securely internalised, is liable to produce patterns of political behaviour that deviate substantially from the interlocking mutuality of interest postulated by classical liberalism. “Contentious” political cycles of resistance and exclusion, and struggles to reshape the rules of the game (rather than merely to live within them) seem to be natural correlates of this climate of uncertainty. This is particularly so in new democracies, where sudden explosions of rights claims and multiplying rights claimants can easily generate an atmosphere of rights inflation can raise expectations well beyond what is reliably deliverable.UFRGS2008-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/259510.22456/1982-5269.2595Revista Debates; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2008); 33Revista Debates; v. 2 n. 1 (2008); 331982-52692236-479Xreponame:Revista Debatesinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/2595/2881Whitehead, Laurenceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-01-10T13:10:15Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/2595Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debatesPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debates/oai1982-52692236-479Xopendoar:2023-01-10T13:10:15Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE |
title |
VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE |
spellingShingle |
VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE Whitehead, Laurence rights instability and volatility new democracies low quality democracy citizenship contentious politics rights instability and volatility new democracies low quality democracy citizenship contentious politics |
title_short |
VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE |
title_full |
VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE |
title_fullStr |
VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE |
title_full_unstemmed |
VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE |
title_sort |
VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE |
author |
Whitehead, Laurence |
author_facet |
Whitehead, Laurence |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Whitehead, Laurence |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
rights instability and volatility new democracies low quality democracy citizenship contentious politics rights instability and volatility new democracies low quality democracy citizenship contentious politics |
topic |
rights instability and volatility new democracies low quality democracy citizenship contentious politics rights instability and volatility new democracies low quality democracy citizenship contentious politics |
description |
The article looks at a partial selection of the many rights claimed by citizens in contemporary democracies in the context of the justice system, citizen security, gender, youths, and access to information – and presents the argument that that democratic “rights” are not a homogeneous reality as posited by liberal theory, but a complex, multilayered one. In new “low quality” democracies, rights volatility presents a special challenge to universality. Social mapping of the range and distribution of bankable rights is likely to uncover a reality that falls well short of the rhetoric of universalism. In highly fragmented and unequal societies, the rhetoric of universality is unlikely to translate easily into genuine evenness of application. And accompanying variability there may be instability or volatility over time. This combination in societies where the “duties” corresponding to rights are not securely internalised, is liable to produce patterns of political behaviour that deviate substantially from the interlocking mutuality of interest postulated by classical liberalism. “Contentious” political cycles of resistance and exclusion, and struggles to reshape the rules of the game (rather than merely to live within them) seem to be natural correlates of this climate of uncertainty. This is particularly so in new democracies, where sudden explosions of rights claims and multiplying rights claimants can easily generate an atmosphere of rights inflation can raise expectations well beyond what is reliably deliverable. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-06-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/2595 10.22456/1982-5269.2595 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/2595 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22456/1982-5269.2595 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/2595/2881 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRGS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRGS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Debates; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2008); 33 Revista Debates; v. 2 n. 1 (2008); 33 1982-5269 2236-479X reponame:Revista Debates instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Revista Debates |
collection |
Revista Debates |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808845563495448576 |