VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Whitehead, Laurence
Data de Publicação: 2008
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Debates
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/2595
Resumo: The article looks at a partial selection of the many rights claimed by citizens in contemporary democracies in the context of the justice system, citizen security, gender, youths, and access to information – and presents the argument that that democratic “rights” are not a homogeneous reality as posited by liberal theory, but a complex, multilayered one. In new “low quality” democracies, rights volatility presents a special challenge to universality. Social mapping of the range and distribution of bankable rights is likely to uncover a reality that falls well short of the rhetoric of universalism. In highly fragmented and unequal societies, the rhetoric of universality is unlikely to translate easily into genuine evenness of application. And accompanying variability there may be instability or volatility over time. This combination in societies where the “duties” corresponding to rights are not securely internalised, is liable to produce patterns of political behaviour that deviate substantially from the interlocking mutuality of interest postulated by classical liberalism. “Contentious” political cycles of resistance and exclusion, and struggles to reshape the rules of the game (rather than merely to live within them) seem to be natural correlates of this climate of uncertainty. This is particularly so in new democracies, where sudden explosions of rights claims and multiplying rights claimants can easily generate an atmosphere of rights inflation can raise expectations well beyond what is reliably deliverable.
id UFRGS-26_5b9423b6561004db9afc749348fb3be0
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/2595
network_acronym_str UFRGS-26
network_name_str Revista Debates
repository_id_str
spelling VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVErights instability and volatilitynew democracieslow quality democracycitizenshipcontentious politicsrights instability and volatilitynew democracieslow quality democracycitizenshipcontentious politicsThe article looks at a partial selection of the many rights claimed by citizens in contemporary democracies in the context of the justice system, citizen security, gender, youths, and access to information – and presents the argument that that democratic “rights” are not a homogeneous reality as posited by liberal theory, but a complex, multilayered one. In new “low quality” democracies, rights volatility presents a special challenge to universality. Social mapping of the range and distribution of bankable rights is likely to uncover a reality that falls well short of the rhetoric of universalism. In highly fragmented and unequal societies, the rhetoric of universality is unlikely to translate easily into genuine evenness of application. And accompanying variability there may be instability or volatility over time. This combination in societies where the “duties” corresponding to rights are not securely internalised, is liable to produce patterns of political behaviour that deviate substantially from the interlocking mutuality of interest postulated by classical liberalism. “Contentious” political cycles of resistance and exclusion, and struggles to reshape the rules of the game (rather than merely to live within them) seem to be natural correlates of this climate of uncertainty. This is particularly so in new democracies, where sudden explosions of rights claims and multiplying rights claimants can easily generate an atmosphere of rights inflation can raise expectations well beyond what is reliably deliverable.UFRGS2008-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/259510.22456/1982-5269.2595Revista Debates; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2008); 33Revista Debates; v. 2 n. 1 (2008); 331982-52692236-479Xreponame:Revista Debatesinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/2595/2881Whitehead, Laurenceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-01-10T13:10:15Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/2595Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debatesPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debates/oai1982-52692236-479Xopendoar:2023-01-10T13:10:15Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
title VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
spellingShingle VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
Whitehead, Laurence
rights instability and volatility
new democracies
low quality democracy
citizenship
contentious politics
rights instability and volatility
new democracies
low quality democracy
citizenship
contentious politics
title_short VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
title_full VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
title_fullStr VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
title_full_unstemmed VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
title_sort VARIABILITY IN RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
author Whitehead, Laurence
author_facet Whitehead, Laurence
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Whitehead, Laurence
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv rights instability and volatility
new democracies
low quality democracy
citizenship
contentious politics
rights instability and volatility
new democracies
low quality democracy
citizenship
contentious politics
topic rights instability and volatility
new democracies
low quality democracy
citizenship
contentious politics
rights instability and volatility
new democracies
low quality democracy
citizenship
contentious politics
description The article looks at a partial selection of the many rights claimed by citizens in contemporary democracies in the context of the justice system, citizen security, gender, youths, and access to information – and presents the argument that that democratic “rights” are not a homogeneous reality as posited by liberal theory, but a complex, multilayered one. In new “low quality” democracies, rights volatility presents a special challenge to universality. Social mapping of the range and distribution of bankable rights is likely to uncover a reality that falls well short of the rhetoric of universalism. In highly fragmented and unequal societies, the rhetoric of universality is unlikely to translate easily into genuine evenness of application. And accompanying variability there may be instability or volatility over time. This combination in societies where the “duties” corresponding to rights are not securely internalised, is liable to produce patterns of political behaviour that deviate substantially from the interlocking mutuality of interest postulated by classical liberalism. “Contentious” political cycles of resistance and exclusion, and struggles to reshape the rules of the game (rather than merely to live within them) seem to be natural correlates of this climate of uncertainty. This is particularly so in new democracies, where sudden explosions of rights claims and multiplying rights claimants can easily generate an atmosphere of rights inflation can raise expectations well beyond what is reliably deliverable.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-06-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/2595
10.22456/1982-5269.2595
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/2595
identifier_str_mv 10.22456/1982-5269.2595
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/2595/2881
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Debates; Vol. 2 Núm. 1 (2008); 33
Revista Debates; v. 2 n. 1 (2008); 33
1982-5269
2236-479X
reponame:Revista Debates
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Revista Debates
collection Revista Debates
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808845563495448576