The Political Science in Argentina: its development and institutionalization

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bulcourf, Pablo Alberto
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Cardozo, Nelson Dionel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Revista Debates
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/43861
Resumo: This article aims to analyze the development of Political Science in Argentina in establishing its specific field based upon the process of institutionalization and professionalization. In developing this study we aim to link the specific field of disciplinary history with the conditions that make the "external history" of political science. Thus we highlight how political, ideological, cultural and economic aspects have conditioned different "political scientist’s models", that have been structured in the Argentinian history, its ruptures and continuities. In explaining these elements we focused mainly in: 1) actors, 2) products, 3) institutions and 4) networks. This allows us an adequate description of the historical process and the different interpretations of political science and politologists.
id UFRGS-26_6866e28849acb1a8181c171d769f5dd1
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/43861
network_acronym_str UFRGS-26
network_name_str Revista Debates
repository_id_str
spelling The Political Science in Argentina: its development and institutionalizationLa Ciencia Política en la Argentina: su desarrollo e institucionalizaciónPolitical ScienceArgentinaPolitical TheoryDisciplinary Field.Ciencia PolíticaArgentinaTeoría PolíticaCampo Disciplinar.This article aims to analyze the development of Political Science in Argentina in establishing its specific field based upon the process of institutionalization and professionalization. In developing this study we aim to link the specific field of disciplinary history with the conditions that make the "external history" of political science. Thus we highlight how political, ideological, cultural and economic aspects have conditioned different "political scientist’s models", that have been structured in the Argentinian history, its ruptures and continuities. In explaining these elements we focused mainly in: 1) actors, 2) products, 3) institutions and 4) networks. This allows us an adequate description of the historical process and the different interpretations of political science and politologists.Este artículo se propone analizar el desarrollo de la Ciencia Política en la Argentina y la conformación de su campo específico a partir de los procesos de institucionalización y profesionalización. Para realizar este estudio pretendemos vincular al campo específico de la historia disciplinar con los condicionantes que hacen a la “historia externa” de la disciplina. De esta forma podemos destacar cómo los aspectos políticos, ideológicos, culturales y económicos han condicionado los diferentes “modelos” de politólogo que han ido estructurando en la historia argentina, sus rupturas y continuidades. Para dar cuenta de estos elementos nos hemos centrado en los principales: 1) actores, 2) productos, 3) instituciones y 4) redes; esto nos permite una descripción adecuada del proceso histórico y la interpretación de las diferentes concepciones sobre la ciencia política y los politólogos.UFRGS2013-12-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/4386110.22456/1982-5269.43861Revista Debates; Vol. 7 Núm. 3 (2013); 57-88Revista Debates; v. 7 n. 3 (2013); 57-881982-52692236-479Xreponame:Revista Debatesinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSspahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/43861/27735Bulcourf, Pablo AlbertoCardozo, Nelson Dionelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-01-10T13:10:20Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/43861Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debatesPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debates/oai1982-52692236-479Xopendoar:2023-01-10T13:10:20Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Political Science in Argentina: its development and institutionalization
La Ciencia Política en la Argentina: su desarrollo e institucionalización
title The Political Science in Argentina: its development and institutionalization
spellingShingle The Political Science in Argentina: its development and institutionalization
Bulcourf, Pablo Alberto
Political Science
Argentina
Political Theory
Disciplinary Field.
Ciencia Política
Argentina
Teoría Política
Campo Disciplinar.
title_short The Political Science in Argentina: its development and institutionalization
title_full The Political Science in Argentina: its development and institutionalization
title_fullStr The Political Science in Argentina: its development and institutionalization
title_full_unstemmed The Political Science in Argentina: its development and institutionalization
title_sort The Political Science in Argentina: its development and institutionalization
author Bulcourf, Pablo Alberto
author_facet Bulcourf, Pablo Alberto
Cardozo, Nelson Dionel
author_role author
author2 Cardozo, Nelson Dionel
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bulcourf, Pablo Alberto
Cardozo, Nelson Dionel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Political Science
Argentina
Political Theory
Disciplinary Field.
Ciencia Política
Argentina
Teoría Política
Campo Disciplinar.
topic Political Science
Argentina
Political Theory
Disciplinary Field.
Ciencia Política
Argentina
Teoría Política
Campo Disciplinar.
description This article aims to analyze the development of Political Science in Argentina in establishing its specific field based upon the process of institutionalization and professionalization. In developing this study we aim to link the specific field of disciplinary history with the conditions that make the "external history" of political science. Thus we highlight how political, ideological, cultural and economic aspects have conditioned different "political scientist’s models", that have been structured in the Argentinian history, its ruptures and continuities. In explaining these elements we focused mainly in: 1) actors, 2) products, 3) institutions and 4) networks. This allows us an adequate description of the historical process and the different interpretations of political science and politologists.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/43861
10.22456/1982-5269.43861
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/43861
identifier_str_mv 10.22456/1982-5269.43861
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/43861/27735
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Debates; Vol. 7 Núm. 3 (2013); 57-88
Revista Debates; v. 7 n. 3 (2013); 57-88
1982-5269
2236-479X
reponame:Revista Debates
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Revista Debates
collection Revista Debates
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798045814600237056

Registros relacionados