The Senate facing the proposals of the Chamber of Deputies in Brazilian bicameralism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rubiatti, Bruno de Castro
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Debates
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/80992
Resumo: Brazilian bicameral system is considered strong once combines incongruence with symmetry. Some degree of disagreement between the chambers is expected because of this, reinforcing the mutual control role of the system. A project must process by both houses to be approved. So, the system of conflict resolution in Brazil is strongly symmetrical: both chambers can initiate a project and have to be favorable for one of them to be approved. When the camera has partial disagreement with the project of the original camera (amendment or replacement), the final word fits the original camera. This article seeks to evaluate the role of the reviewer of the Senate, noting the destination and time in review of the projects initiated by the deputies who entered the Senate between 1999 and 2014. From these data it is possible to observe the Senators' strategy against the deputies in the legislative process, seeing the retention of projects that take place in this chamber.
id UFRGS-26_7093375d4297acd5b09229caea6e0df7
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/80992
network_acronym_str UFRGS-26
network_name_str Revista Debates
repository_id_str
spelling The Senate facing the proposals of the Chamber of Deputies in Brazilian bicameralismEl Senado frente a las propuestas de la Cámara de Diputados en el bicameralismo brasileñoO Senado frente as propostas da Câmara dos Deputados no Bicameralismo BrasileiroSenadoProcesso legislativoBicameralismoSenateReview ChamberLegislative Process.SenadoCámara RevisoraProceso Legislativo.Brazilian bicameral system is considered strong once combines incongruence with symmetry. Some degree of disagreement between the chambers is expected because of this, reinforcing the mutual control role of the system. A project must process by both houses to be approved. So, the system of conflict resolution in Brazil is strongly symmetrical: both chambers can initiate a project and have to be favorable for one of them to be approved. When the camera has partial disagreement with the project of the original camera (amendment or replacement), the final word fits the original camera. This article seeks to evaluate the role of the reviewer of the Senate, noting the destination and time in review of the projects initiated by the deputies who entered the Senate between 1999 and 2014. From these data it is possible to observe the Senators' strategy against the deputies in the legislative process, seeing the retention of projects that take place in this chamber.Brasil adopta un sistema bicameral considerado fuerte, es decir, conjuga incongruencia con simetría. Así, se espera algún grado de desacuerdo entre las cámaras, reforzando el papel de control mutuo del sistema. Un proyecto debe tramitar por ambas casas para ser aprobado. De esta forma, el sistema de resolución de conflictos en Brasil es fuertemente simétrico: ambas cámaras pueden iniciar un proyecto y tienen que ser favorables para que uno de ellos sea aprobado. Cuando la cámara revisor presenta desacuerdo parcial con el proyecto de la cámara de origen (enmienda o sustitutivo), la palabra final sobre el mismo corresponde a la cámara de origen. Este artículo busca evaluar el papel de revisor del Senado, observando cuál es el destino y el tiempo de tramitación en revisión de los proyectos iniciados por los diputados que entraron en el Senado entre los años 1999-2014. A partir de esos datos, es posible observar la estrategia de los Senadores frente a los diputados en el proceso legislativo, observando la retención de proyectos que ocurre en esa cámara.O Brasil adota um sistema bicameral considerado forte, isto é, conjuga incongruência com simetria. Assim, é esperado algum grau de desacordo entre as câmaras, reforçando o papel de controle mútuo do sistema. Um projeto deve tramitar por ambas as casas para ser aprovado. Dessa forma, o sistema de resolução de conflitos no Brasil é fortemente simétrico: ambas as câmaras podem iniciar um projeto e têm que ser favoráveis para que um ele seja aprovado. Quando a câmara revisora apresenta desacordo parcial com o projeto da câmara de origem (emenda ou substitutivo), a palavra final sobre o mesmo cabe a câmara de origem. Esse artigo busca avaliar o papel de revisor do Senado, observando qual o destino e o tempo de tramitação em revisão dos projetos iniciados pelos deputados que entraram no Senado entre os anos de 1999-2014. A partir desses dados é possível observar a estratégia dos Senadores frente aos deputados no processo legislativo, observando a retenção de projetos que ocorre nessa câmara.UFRGS2018-08-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/8099210.22456/1982-5269.80992Revista Debates; Vol. 12 Núm. 2 (2018): Dossier Desarrollo sustentable, seguridad humana y gobernanza participativa; 169-199Revista Debates; v. 12 n. 2 (2018): Dossiê Desenvolvimento sustentável, segurança humana e governança participativa; 169-1991982-52692236-479Xreponame:Revista Debatesinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/80992/49576Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Debatesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRubiatti, Bruno de Castro2018-08-30T17:30:58Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/80992Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debatesPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debates/oai1982-52692236-479Xopendoar:2018-08-30T17:30:58Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Senate facing the proposals of the Chamber of Deputies in Brazilian bicameralism
El Senado frente a las propuestas de la Cámara de Diputados en el bicameralismo brasileño
O Senado frente as propostas da Câmara dos Deputados no Bicameralismo Brasileiro
title The Senate facing the proposals of the Chamber of Deputies in Brazilian bicameralism
spellingShingle The Senate facing the proposals of the Chamber of Deputies in Brazilian bicameralism
Rubiatti, Bruno de Castro
Senado
Processo legislativo
Bicameralismo
Senate
Review Chamber
Legislative Process.
Senado
Cámara Revisora
Proceso Legislativo.
title_short The Senate facing the proposals of the Chamber of Deputies in Brazilian bicameralism
title_full The Senate facing the proposals of the Chamber of Deputies in Brazilian bicameralism
title_fullStr The Senate facing the proposals of the Chamber of Deputies in Brazilian bicameralism
title_full_unstemmed The Senate facing the proposals of the Chamber of Deputies in Brazilian bicameralism
title_sort The Senate facing the proposals of the Chamber of Deputies in Brazilian bicameralism
author Rubiatti, Bruno de Castro
author_facet Rubiatti, Bruno de Castro
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rubiatti, Bruno de Castro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Senado
Processo legislativo
Bicameralismo
Senate
Review Chamber
Legislative Process.
Senado
Cámara Revisora
Proceso Legislativo.
topic Senado
Processo legislativo
Bicameralismo
Senate
Review Chamber
Legislative Process.
Senado
Cámara Revisora
Proceso Legislativo.
description Brazilian bicameral system is considered strong once combines incongruence with symmetry. Some degree of disagreement between the chambers is expected because of this, reinforcing the mutual control role of the system. A project must process by both houses to be approved. So, the system of conflict resolution in Brazil is strongly symmetrical: both chambers can initiate a project and have to be favorable for one of them to be approved. When the camera has partial disagreement with the project of the original camera (amendment or replacement), the final word fits the original camera. This article seeks to evaluate the role of the reviewer of the Senate, noting the destination and time in review of the projects initiated by the deputies who entered the Senate between 1999 and 2014. From these data it is possible to observe the Senators' strategy against the deputies in the legislative process, seeing the retention of projects that take place in this chamber.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/80992
10.22456/1982-5269.80992
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/80992
identifier_str_mv 10.22456/1982-5269.80992
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/80992/49576
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Debates
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Debates
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Debates; Vol. 12 Núm. 2 (2018): Dossier Desarrollo sustentable, seguridad humana y gobernanza participativa; 169-199
Revista Debates; v. 12 n. 2 (2018): Dossiê Desenvolvimento sustentável, segurança humana e governança participativa; 169-199
1982-5269
2236-479X
reponame:Revista Debates
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Revista Debates
collection Revista Debates
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808845566336040960

Registros relacionados