Why do we still speak of clientelism in Brazil?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Müller, Matheus
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Debates
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/109274
Resumo: Unlike coronelism, which lost strength with the advance of the mechanisms of control over the electoral process, or of "mandonismo", which became rare with the affirmation of the political and civil rights in the country, clientelism remained alive throughout the history of the Brazilian democracy. Over time, the actors changed, its presence decreased in certain periods, increased in others, but the exchange of goods of any nature for the voter's vote never ceased to exist. This study is committed to discovering the profile of the voter preferred by the candidates to offer clientelism between the years 2000 and 2010 in Brazil. It uses quantitative methodology and techniques of descriptive statistics and of the relative risk for the analysis. The main results obtained make some of the premises of Political Science and of common sense about this practice, which is so common to Brazilian politics, fall apart.
id UFRGS-26_a229de703d16f2cac83882fc4a4a8797
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/109274
network_acronym_str UFRGS-26
network_name_str Revista Debates
repository_id_str
spelling Why do we still speak of clientelism in Brazil?¿Por qué seguimos hablando de clientelismo en Brasil?Por que ainda falamos de clientelismo no Brasil?ClientelismoComportamento PolíticoEleiçõesBrasil.ClientelismPolitical BehaviorElectionsBrazil.ClientelismoComportamiento PolíticoEleccionesBrasil.Unlike coronelism, which lost strength with the advance of the mechanisms of control over the electoral process, or of "mandonismo", which became rare with the affirmation of the political and civil rights in the country, clientelism remained alive throughout the history of the Brazilian democracy. Over time, the actors changed, its presence decreased in certain periods, increased in others, but the exchange of goods of any nature for the voter's vote never ceased to exist. This study is committed to discovering the profile of the voter preferred by the candidates to offer clientelism between the years 2000 and 2010 in Brazil. It uses quantitative methodology and techniques of descriptive statistics and of the relative risk for the analysis. The main results obtained make some of the premises of Political Science and of common sense about this practice, which is so common to Brazilian politics, fall apart.A diferencia del coronelismo, que perdió fuerza con el avance de los mecanismos de control del proceso electoral, o del mandonismo, que se hizo raro con la afirmación de los derechos políticos y civiles en el país, el clientelismo se mantuvo vivo a lo largo de la historia de la democracia brasileña. Con el tiempo, los actores cambiaron, su presencia disminuyó en ciertos períodos, aumentó en otros, pero el intercambio de bienes de cualquier naturaleza por el voto del votante nunca dejó de existir. Este estudio se compromete a conocer el perfil del votante preferido por los candidatos para ofrecer clientelismo entre los años 2000 y 2010 en Brasil. Utiliza metodología cuantitativa y técnicas de estadística descriptiva y del riesgo relativo para el análisis. Los principales resultados obtenidos hacen que se desmoronen algunas de las premisas de la Ciencia Política y del sentido común sobre esta práctica, tan común en la política brasileña.Diferentemente do coronelismo, que perdeu força com o avanço dos mecanismos de controle sobre o processo eleitoral, ou do mandonismo, que rareou com a afirmação dos direitos políticos e civis no país, o clientelismo se manteve vivo por toda a história da democracia brasileira. Com o passar do tempo, mudaram os atores, sua presença diminuiu em determinados períodos, aumentou em outros, mas a troca de bens de qualquer natureza pelo voto do eleitor nunca deixou de existir. Este estudo assume o compromisso de descobrir o perfil do eleitor preferido pelos candidatos para ofertar o clientelismo entre os anos de 2000 e 2010 no Brasil. Se vale da metodologia quantitativa e das técnicas da estatística descritiva e do risco relativo para sua análise. Os principais resultados obtidos fazem cair por terra algumas das premissas da Ciência Política e do senso comum a respeito dessa prática tão comum à política brasileira.UFRGS2020-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpesquisa quantitativaapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/10927410.22456/1982-5269.109274Revista Debates; Vol. 14 Núm. 3 (2020): Partidos Políticos e Organização Partidária; 150-176Revista Debates; v. 14 n. 3 (2020): Partidos Políticos e Organização Partidária; 150-1761982-52692236-479Xreponame:Revista Debatesinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/109274/59786Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Debatesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMüller, Matheus2020-12-18T19:51:06Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/109274Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debatesPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debates/oai1982-52692236-479Xopendoar:2020-12-18T19:51:06Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Why do we still speak of clientelism in Brazil?
¿Por qué seguimos hablando de clientelismo en Brasil?
Por que ainda falamos de clientelismo no Brasil?
title Why do we still speak of clientelism in Brazil?
spellingShingle Why do we still speak of clientelism in Brazil?
Müller, Matheus
Clientelismo
Comportamento Político
Eleições
Brasil.
Clientelism
Political Behavior
Elections
Brazil.
Clientelismo
Comportamiento Político
Elecciones
Brasil.
title_short Why do we still speak of clientelism in Brazil?
title_full Why do we still speak of clientelism in Brazil?
title_fullStr Why do we still speak of clientelism in Brazil?
title_full_unstemmed Why do we still speak of clientelism in Brazil?
title_sort Why do we still speak of clientelism in Brazil?
author Müller, Matheus
author_facet Müller, Matheus
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Müller, Matheus
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Clientelismo
Comportamento Político
Eleições
Brasil.
Clientelism
Political Behavior
Elections
Brazil.
Clientelismo
Comportamiento Político
Elecciones
Brasil.
topic Clientelismo
Comportamento Político
Eleições
Brasil.
Clientelism
Political Behavior
Elections
Brazil.
Clientelismo
Comportamiento Político
Elecciones
Brasil.
description Unlike coronelism, which lost strength with the advance of the mechanisms of control over the electoral process, or of "mandonismo", which became rare with the affirmation of the political and civil rights in the country, clientelism remained alive throughout the history of the Brazilian democracy. Over time, the actors changed, its presence decreased in certain periods, increased in others, but the exchange of goods of any nature for the voter's vote never ceased to exist. This study is committed to discovering the profile of the voter preferred by the candidates to offer clientelism between the years 2000 and 2010 in Brazil. It uses quantitative methodology and techniques of descriptive statistics and of the relative risk for the analysis. The main results obtained make some of the premises of Political Science and of common sense about this practice, which is so common to Brazilian politics, fall apart.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
pesquisa quantitativa
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/109274
10.22456/1982-5269.109274
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/109274
identifier_str_mv 10.22456/1982-5269.109274
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/109274/59786
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Debates
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Debates
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Debates; Vol. 14 Núm. 3 (2020): Partidos Políticos e Organização Partidária; 150-176
Revista Debates; v. 14 n. 3 (2020): Partidos Políticos e Organização Partidária; 150-176
1982-5269
2236-479X
reponame:Revista Debates
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Revista Debates
collection Revista Debates
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808845566510104576

Registros relacionados