Crossed factions: agreements and partisan disputes in changes of judges at the Court of the province of Santa Fe, Argentina (1983-2011)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Abdulhadi, Augusto
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Revista Debates
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/111004
Resumo: Supreme Courts are collegiate organs of conduction of the Judicial Power, and they have decision-making power over issues that affect government projects or public policies, which makes them relevant actors for both national and subnational politics. The literature on comparative judicial politics indicates that, in Argentina, Supreme Court judges turnover is frequent, and partisan incentives are a great predictor of changes in Courts, but there is no clear relationship between these changes and the control of legislative majorities. This article presents a case study analysis of the political changes of Supreme Court judges of the province of Santa Fe between 1983 and 2011. The causal mechanisms which are proposed here are based on a strategic argument that explains political changes at Supreme Courts of Argentinean provinces.
id UFRGS-26_bb52d1dcd918f7ab741c628f2b4c8735
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/111004
network_acronym_str UFRGS-26
network_name_str Revista Debates
repository_id_str
spelling Crossed factions: agreements and partisan disputes in changes of judges at the Court of the province of Santa Fe, Argentina (1983-2011)Facciones cruzadas: acuerdos y disputas partidarias en los nombramientos de jueces de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la provincia de Santa Fe, Argentina (1983-2011)Facções cruzadas: acordos partidários e disputas nas mudanças de juízes do Tribunal da província de Santa Fé, Argentina (1983-2011)Política subnacionalCortes judicialesDemocraciaprovincias argentinasSupreme Courts are collegiate organs of conduction of the Judicial Power, and they have decision-making power over issues that affect government projects or public policies, which makes them relevant actors for both national and subnational politics. The literature on comparative judicial politics indicates that, in Argentina, Supreme Court judges turnover is frequent, and partisan incentives are a great predictor of changes in Courts, but there is no clear relationship between these changes and the control of legislative majorities. This article presents a case study analysis of the political changes of Supreme Court judges of the province of Santa Fe between 1983 and 2011. The causal mechanisms which are proposed here are based on a strategic argument that explains political changes at Supreme Courts of Argentinean provinces.Las Cortes judiciales son órganos colegiados de conducción del Poder Judicial, y tienen poder de decisión sobre temas que afectan proyectos de gobierno o políticas públicas, lo que las convierte en actores relevantes tanto para la política nacional como subnacional. En Argentina existe una rotación frecuente de jueces en los STJ provinciales y la literatura de estudios judiciales comparados señala que los incentivos partidarios predicen estos cambios en las Cortes. Sin embargo, no existe una clara relación entre estos cambios y el poder partidario de que disponen los gobernadores. Este trabajo realiza un estudio de caso a partir del análisis de los cambios políticos de jueces de la Corte Suprema de la provincia de Santa Fe entre 1983 y 2011. Los mecanismos causales propuestos se basan en un argumento estratégico que sirve para explicar esos cambios políticos de jueces de las Cortes en las provincias argentinas.Os Tribunais Judiciais são órgãos colegiados que conduzem o Judiciário e têm poder de decisão sobre questões que afetam projetos de governo ou políticas públicas, o que os torna atores relevantes para as políticas nacionais e subnacionais. Na Argentina, há uma rotação frequente de juízes nos STJs provinciais, e a literatura de estudos judiciais comparativos indica que incentivos partidários predizem essas mudanças nos Tribunais. No entanto, não há uma relação clara entre essas mudanças e o poder partidário dos governadores. Este trabalho realiza um estudo de caso com base na análise das mudanças políticas dos juízes do Supremo Tribunal da província de Santa Fé entre 1983 e 2011. Os mecanismos causais propostos baseiam-se em um argumento estratégico que serve para explicar essas mudanças políticas dos juízes. das Cortes nas províncias argentinas.UFRGS2021-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionEstudio de casoapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/11100410.22456/1982-5269.111004Revista Debates; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2021): O avanço da extrema direita na América Latina e na Europa; 186-211Revista Debates; v. 15 n. 2 (2021): O avanço da extrema direita na América Latina e na Europa; 186-2111982-52692236-479Xreponame:Revista Debatesinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSspahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/111004/64246Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Debatesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAbdulhadi, Augusto2022-06-28T13:30:47Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/111004Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debatesPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debates/oai1982-52692236-479Xopendoar:2022-06-28T13:30:47Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Crossed factions: agreements and partisan disputes in changes of judges at the Court of the province of Santa Fe, Argentina (1983-2011)
Facciones cruzadas: acuerdos y disputas partidarias en los nombramientos de jueces de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la provincia de Santa Fe, Argentina (1983-2011)
Facções cruzadas: acordos partidários e disputas nas mudanças de juízes do Tribunal da província de Santa Fé, Argentina (1983-2011)
title Crossed factions: agreements and partisan disputes in changes of judges at the Court of the province of Santa Fe, Argentina (1983-2011)
spellingShingle Crossed factions: agreements and partisan disputes in changes of judges at the Court of the province of Santa Fe, Argentina (1983-2011)
Abdulhadi, Augusto
Política subnacional
Cortes judiciales
Democracia
provincias argentinas
title_short Crossed factions: agreements and partisan disputes in changes of judges at the Court of the province of Santa Fe, Argentina (1983-2011)
title_full Crossed factions: agreements and partisan disputes in changes of judges at the Court of the province of Santa Fe, Argentina (1983-2011)
title_fullStr Crossed factions: agreements and partisan disputes in changes of judges at the Court of the province of Santa Fe, Argentina (1983-2011)
title_full_unstemmed Crossed factions: agreements and partisan disputes in changes of judges at the Court of the province of Santa Fe, Argentina (1983-2011)
title_sort Crossed factions: agreements and partisan disputes in changes of judges at the Court of the province of Santa Fe, Argentina (1983-2011)
author Abdulhadi, Augusto
author_facet Abdulhadi, Augusto
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Abdulhadi, Augusto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Política subnacional
Cortes judiciales
Democracia
provincias argentinas
topic Política subnacional
Cortes judiciales
Democracia
provincias argentinas
description Supreme Courts are collegiate organs of conduction of the Judicial Power, and they have decision-making power over issues that affect government projects or public policies, which makes them relevant actors for both national and subnational politics. The literature on comparative judicial politics indicates that, in Argentina, Supreme Court judges turnover is frequent, and partisan incentives are a great predictor of changes in Courts, but there is no clear relationship between these changes and the control of legislative majorities. This article presents a case study analysis of the political changes of Supreme Court judges of the province of Santa Fe between 1983 and 2011. The causal mechanisms which are proposed here are based on a strategic argument that explains political changes at Supreme Courts of Argentinean provinces.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Estudio de caso
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/111004
10.22456/1982-5269.111004
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/111004
identifier_str_mv 10.22456/1982-5269.111004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/111004/64246
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Debates
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Debates
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Debates; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2021): O avanço da extrema direita na América Latina e na Europa; 186-211
Revista Debates; v. 15 n. 2 (2021): O avanço da extrema direita na América Latina e na Europa; 186-211
1982-5269
2236-479X
reponame:Revista Debates
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Revista Debates
collection Revista Debates
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798045816195121152

Registros relacionados