Memory vs oblivion: analysis of the Law on Access to Public Information formulation process

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soares, Alessandra Guimarães
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Debates
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/74882
Resumo: This paper analyzes the political process that led the changes in the Law on Access to Public Information that allowed the opening of archives of the period of exception and, consequently, served to make feasible the work of the National Truth Comission (CNV). The analysis, based on the memory and oblivion binomial, brings the clashes to this topic in the National Congress after the Constitution of 1988 until 2011, when were created the CNV and the last amendment of the Law on Access to Information. The theoretical methodological reference used was the advocacy coalition framework.
id UFRGS-26_ee4409a9aaf4250e704751e0eaafddca
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/74882
network_acronym_str UFRGS-26
network_name_str Revista Debates
repository_id_str
spelling Memory vs oblivion: analysis of the Law on Access to Public Information formulation processMemória vs esquecimento: análise do processo de formulação da Lei de Acesso à InformaçãoLei de Acesso à InformaçãoCongresso NacionalAdvocacy Coalition Framework.Law on Access to InformationNational CongressAdvocacy Coalition Framework.This paper analyzes the political process that led the changes in the Law on Access to Public Information that allowed the opening of archives of the period of exception and, consequently, served to make feasible the work of the National Truth Comission (CNV). The analysis, based on the memory and oblivion binomial, brings the clashes to this topic in the National Congress after the Constitution of 1988 until 2011, when were created the CNV and the last amendment of the Law on Access to Information. The theoretical methodological reference used was the advocacy coalition framework.O objetivo deste trabalho é analisar o processo político que levou as mudanças na Lei de Acesso à Informação Pública que permitiram a abertura dos arquivos do período de exceção e, consequentemente, serviram para viabilizar os trabalhos da Comissão Nacional da Verdade (CNV). A análise, realizada a partir do binômio memória vs esquecimento, traz os embates travados sobre esse tema no Congresso Nacional pós-Constituição de 1988 até o ano de 2011, momento de criação da CNV e da edição da última alteração da Lei de Acesso à Informação. O referencial teórico metodológico empregado foi o do advocacy coalition framework.UFRGS2017-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPesquisa Qualitativaapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/7488210.22456/1982-5269.74882Revista Debates; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2017): Ideologia e Política Externa; 175-196Revista Debates; v. 11 n. 2 (2017): Ideologia e Política Externa; 175-1961982-52692236-479Xreponame:Revista Debatesinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/74882/43500Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Debatesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares, Alessandra Guimarães2017-09-13T18:58:46Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/74882Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debatesPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debates/oai1982-52692236-479Xopendoar:2017-09-13T18:58:46Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Memory vs oblivion: analysis of the Law on Access to Public Information formulation process
Memória vs esquecimento: análise do processo de formulação da Lei de Acesso à Informação
title Memory vs oblivion: analysis of the Law on Access to Public Information formulation process
spellingShingle Memory vs oblivion: analysis of the Law on Access to Public Information formulation process
Soares, Alessandra Guimarães
Lei de Acesso à Informação
Congresso Nacional
Advocacy Coalition Framework.
Law on Access to Information
National Congress
Advocacy Coalition Framework.
title_short Memory vs oblivion: analysis of the Law on Access to Public Information formulation process
title_full Memory vs oblivion: analysis of the Law on Access to Public Information formulation process
title_fullStr Memory vs oblivion: analysis of the Law on Access to Public Information formulation process
title_full_unstemmed Memory vs oblivion: analysis of the Law on Access to Public Information formulation process
title_sort Memory vs oblivion: analysis of the Law on Access to Public Information formulation process
author Soares, Alessandra Guimarães
author_facet Soares, Alessandra Guimarães
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soares, Alessandra Guimarães
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Lei de Acesso à Informação
Congresso Nacional
Advocacy Coalition Framework.
Law on Access to Information
National Congress
Advocacy Coalition Framework.
topic Lei de Acesso à Informação
Congresso Nacional
Advocacy Coalition Framework.
Law on Access to Information
National Congress
Advocacy Coalition Framework.
description This paper analyzes the political process that led the changes in the Law on Access to Public Information that allowed the opening of archives of the period of exception and, consequently, served to make feasible the work of the National Truth Comission (CNV). The analysis, based on the memory and oblivion binomial, brings the clashes to this topic in the National Congress after the Constitution of 1988 until 2011, when were created the CNV and the last amendment of the Law on Access to Information. The theoretical methodological reference used was the advocacy coalition framework.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Pesquisa Qualitativa
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/74882
10.22456/1982-5269.74882
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/74882
identifier_str_mv 10.22456/1982-5269.74882
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/74882/43500
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Debates
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Debates
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Debates; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2017): Ideologia e Política Externa; 175-196
Revista Debates; v. 11 n. 2 (2017): Ideologia e Política Externa; 175-196
1982-5269
2236-479X
reponame:Revista Debates
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Revista Debates
collection Revista Debates
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798045815294394368

Registros relacionados