Which documentation for software maintenance?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-65002006000400004 |
Resumo: | Software engineering has been striving for years to improve the practice of software development and maintenance. Documentation has long been prominent on the list of recommended practices to improve development and help maintenance. Recently however, agile methods started to shake this view, arguing that the goal of the game is to produce software and that documentation is only useful as long as it helps to reach this goal. On the other hand, in the re-engineering field, people wish they could re-document useful legacy software so that they may continue maintain them or migrate them to new platform. In these two case, a crucial question arises: How much documentation is enough? In this article, we present the results of a survey of software maintainers to try to establish what documentation artifacts are the most important to them. |
id |
UFRGS-28_8b2034747811be2de333c7c3daae15b5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0104-65002006000400004 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-28 |
network_name_str |
Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Which documentation for software maintenance?Software engineering has been striving for years to improve the practice of software development and maintenance. Documentation has long been prominent on the list of recommended practices to improve development and help maintenance. Recently however, agile methods started to shake this view, arguing that the goal of the game is to produce software and that documentation is only useful as long as it helps to reach this goal. On the other hand, in the re-engineering field, people wish they could re-document useful legacy software so that they may continue maintain them or migrate them to new platform. In these two case, a crucial question arises: How much documentation is enough? In this article, we present the results of a survey of software maintainers to try to establish what documentation artifacts are the most important to them.Sociedade Brasileira de Computação2006-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-65002006000400004Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society v.12 n.3 2006reponame:Journal of the Brazilian Computer Societyinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC)instacron:UFRGS10.1007/BF03194494info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza,Sergio Cozzetti B. deAnquetil,NicolasOliveira,Káthia M. deeng2010-05-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-65002006000400004Revistahttps://journal-bcs.springeropen.com/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpjbcs@icmc.sc.usp.br1678-48040104-6500opendoar:2010-05-24T00:00Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society - Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Which documentation for software maintenance? |
title |
Which documentation for software maintenance? |
spellingShingle |
Which documentation for software maintenance? Souza,Sergio Cozzetti B. de |
title_short |
Which documentation for software maintenance? |
title_full |
Which documentation for software maintenance? |
title_fullStr |
Which documentation for software maintenance? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Which documentation for software maintenance? |
title_sort |
Which documentation for software maintenance? |
author |
Souza,Sergio Cozzetti B. de |
author_facet |
Souza,Sergio Cozzetti B. de Anquetil,Nicolas Oliveira,Káthia M. de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Anquetil,Nicolas Oliveira,Káthia M. de |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza,Sergio Cozzetti B. de Anquetil,Nicolas Oliveira,Káthia M. de |
description |
Software engineering has been striving for years to improve the practice of software development and maintenance. Documentation has long been prominent on the list of recommended practices to improve development and help maintenance. Recently however, agile methods started to shake this view, arguing that the goal of the game is to produce software and that documentation is only useful as long as it helps to reach this goal. On the other hand, in the re-engineering field, people wish they could re-document useful legacy software so that they may continue maintain them or migrate them to new platform. In these two case, a crucial question arises: How much documentation is enough? In this article, we present the results of a survey of software maintainers to try to establish what documentation artifacts are the most important to them. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-65002006000400004 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-65002006000400004 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1007/BF03194494 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Computação |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Computação |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society v.12 n.3 2006 reponame:Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society |
collection |
Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society - Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
jbcs@icmc.sc.usp.br |
_version_ |
1754734669928071168 |