Effect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180692 |
Resumo: | Objective: To evaluate the effect of erosive challenges on the toothrestoration interface of deciduous teeth treated with different adhesive protocols. Material and Methods: Deciduous molars were cut mesiodistally, then embedded, abraded and polished (n=80). Samples were randomly divided according to the adhesive system used into: G1 (Adper Single Bond2®, etch-and-rinse), G2 (Universal Single Bond®, self-etching), G3 (OptibondFL®, etch-and-rinse with Fluoride) and G4 (BondForce®, self-etching with Fluoride). After standardized cavity preparation (2 mm diameter x 2 mm depth), adhesive systems were applied and samples were restored (composite resin Z350®). Half of the samples were exposed to erosive/abrasive cycles (n=10, each adhesive group), and the other half (control group; n=10) remained immersed in artificial saliva. For microleakage analysis, samples were submersed in methylene blue and analyzed at 40x magnifications. Cross-sectional microhardness (CSMH) was carried out (50 g/5 s) at 25 μm, 50 μm, and 100 μm from the eroded surface and at 25 μm, 75 μm, and 125 μm from the enamel bond interface. Results: Regarding microleakage, 7.5% of the samples showed no dye infiltration, 30% showed dye infiltration only at the enamel interface, and 62.5% showed dye infiltration through the dentin–enamel junction, with no difference between groups (p≥0.05). No significant difference was observed in CSMH at different depths (two-way ANOVA, p≥0.05). Conclusions: We did not observe significant changes in microleakage or CSMH after erosive/abrasive challenges in deciduous teeth treated with different adhesive protocols (etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesives, with and without fluoride). |
id |
UFRGS-2_01a82576db2225b1a854b904e17b2570 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/180692 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Assunção, Cristiane MeiraSilva, Marcelo Goulart Rodrigues daEssvein, Tattiana EnrichSantos, Nicole Marchioro dosErhardt, Maria Carolina GuilhermeLussi, AdrianRodrigues, Jonas de Almeida2018-07-28T02:46:02Z20181678-7757http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180692001060664Objective: To evaluate the effect of erosive challenges on the toothrestoration interface of deciduous teeth treated with different adhesive protocols. Material and Methods: Deciduous molars were cut mesiodistally, then embedded, abraded and polished (n=80). Samples were randomly divided according to the adhesive system used into: G1 (Adper Single Bond2®, etch-and-rinse), G2 (Universal Single Bond®, self-etching), G3 (OptibondFL®, etch-and-rinse with Fluoride) and G4 (BondForce®, self-etching with Fluoride). After standardized cavity preparation (2 mm diameter x 2 mm depth), adhesive systems were applied and samples were restored (composite resin Z350®). Half of the samples were exposed to erosive/abrasive cycles (n=10, each adhesive group), and the other half (control group; n=10) remained immersed in artificial saliva. For microleakage analysis, samples were submersed in methylene blue and analyzed at 40x magnifications. Cross-sectional microhardness (CSMH) was carried out (50 g/5 s) at 25 μm, 50 μm, and 100 μm from the eroded surface and at 25 μm, 75 μm, and 125 μm from the enamel bond interface. Results: Regarding microleakage, 7.5% of the samples showed no dye infiltration, 30% showed dye infiltration only at the enamel interface, and 62.5% showed dye infiltration through the dentin–enamel junction, with no difference between groups (p≥0.05). No significant difference was observed in CSMH at different depths (two-way ANOVA, p≥0.05). Conclusions: We did not observe significant changes in microleakage or CSMH after erosive/abrasive challenges in deciduous teeth treated with different adhesive protocols (etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesives, with and without fluoride).application/pdfengJournal of applied oral science. Bauru. Vol. 26 (2018), p. 1-8Erosão dentáriaDentes decíduosDeciduous toothErosive tooth wearAdhesiveTooth erosionTooth wearEffect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro studyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL001060664.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf415565http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180692/1/001060664.pdfaab5d07c01d4da86c00189795d4a0085MD51TEXT001060664.pdf.txt001060664.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain34380http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180692/2/001060664.pdf.txtd46ac1755476c4fec804dcc6853869e4MD52THUMBNAIL001060664.pdf.jpg001060664.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1977http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180692/3/001060664.pdf.jpgadf7e7bad3bd2e858748bb5a8aea255aMD5310183/1806922018-10-05 07:32:09.126oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/180692Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2018-10-05T10:32:09Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Effect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro study |
title |
Effect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro study |
spellingShingle |
Effect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro study Assunção, Cristiane Meira Erosão dentária Dentes decíduos Deciduous tooth Erosive tooth wear Adhesive Tooth erosion Tooth wear |
title_short |
Effect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro study |
title_full |
Effect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro study |
title_fullStr |
Effect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro study |
title_sort |
Effect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro study |
author |
Assunção, Cristiane Meira |
author_facet |
Assunção, Cristiane Meira Silva, Marcelo Goulart Rodrigues da Essvein, Tattiana Enrich Santos, Nicole Marchioro dos Erhardt, Maria Carolina Guilherme Lussi, Adrian Rodrigues, Jonas de Almeida |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Marcelo Goulart Rodrigues da Essvein, Tattiana Enrich Santos, Nicole Marchioro dos Erhardt, Maria Carolina Guilherme Lussi, Adrian Rodrigues, Jonas de Almeida |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Assunção, Cristiane Meira Silva, Marcelo Goulart Rodrigues da Essvein, Tattiana Enrich Santos, Nicole Marchioro dos Erhardt, Maria Carolina Guilherme Lussi, Adrian Rodrigues, Jonas de Almeida |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Erosão dentária Dentes decíduos |
topic |
Erosão dentária Dentes decíduos Deciduous tooth Erosive tooth wear Adhesive Tooth erosion Tooth wear |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Deciduous tooth Erosive tooth wear Adhesive Tooth erosion Tooth wear |
description |
Objective: To evaluate the effect of erosive challenges on the toothrestoration interface of deciduous teeth treated with different adhesive protocols. Material and Methods: Deciduous molars were cut mesiodistally, then embedded, abraded and polished (n=80). Samples were randomly divided according to the adhesive system used into: G1 (Adper Single Bond2®, etch-and-rinse), G2 (Universal Single Bond®, self-etching), G3 (OptibondFL®, etch-and-rinse with Fluoride) and G4 (BondForce®, self-etching with Fluoride). After standardized cavity preparation (2 mm diameter x 2 mm depth), adhesive systems were applied and samples were restored (composite resin Z350®). Half of the samples were exposed to erosive/abrasive cycles (n=10, each adhesive group), and the other half (control group; n=10) remained immersed in artificial saliva. For microleakage analysis, samples were submersed in methylene blue and analyzed at 40x magnifications. Cross-sectional microhardness (CSMH) was carried out (50 g/5 s) at 25 μm, 50 μm, and 100 μm from the eroded surface and at 25 μm, 75 μm, and 125 μm from the enamel bond interface. Results: Regarding microleakage, 7.5% of the samples showed no dye infiltration, 30% showed dye infiltration only at the enamel interface, and 62.5% showed dye infiltration through the dentin–enamel junction, with no difference between groups (p≥0.05). No significant difference was observed in CSMH at different depths (two-way ANOVA, p≥0.05). Conclusions: We did not observe significant changes in microleakage or CSMH after erosive/abrasive challenges in deciduous teeth treated with different adhesive protocols (etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesives, with and without fluoride). |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-07-28T02:46:02Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180692 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1678-7757 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001060664 |
identifier_str_mv |
1678-7757 001060664 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180692 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Journal of applied oral science. Bauru. Vol. 26 (2018), p. 1-8 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180692/1/001060664.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180692/2/001060664.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180692/3/001060664.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
aab5d07c01d4da86c00189795d4a0085 d46ac1755476c4fec804dcc6853869e4 adf7e7bad3bd2e858748bb5a8aea255a |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447664881303552 |