Effect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Assunção, Cristiane Meira
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Silva, Marcelo Goulart Rodrigues da, Essvein, Tattiana Enrich, Santos, Nicole Marchioro dos, Erhardt, Maria Carolina Guilherme, Lussi, Adrian, Rodrigues, Jonas de Almeida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180692
Resumo: Objective: To evaluate the effect of erosive challenges on the toothrestoration interface of deciduous teeth treated with different adhesive protocols. Material and Methods: Deciduous molars were cut mesiodistally, then embedded, abraded and polished (n=80). Samples were randomly divided according to the adhesive system used into: G1 (Adper Single Bond2®, etch-and-rinse), G2 (Universal Single Bond®, self-etching), G3 (OptibondFL®, etch-and-rinse with Fluoride) and G4 (BondForce®, self-etching with Fluoride). After standardized cavity preparation (2 mm diameter x 2 mm depth), adhesive systems were applied and samples were restored (composite resin Z350®). Half of the samples were exposed to erosive/abrasive cycles (n=10, each adhesive group), and the other half (control group; n=10) remained immersed in artificial saliva. For microleakage analysis, samples were submersed in methylene blue and analyzed at 40x magnifications. Cross-sectional microhardness (CSMH) was carried out (50 g/5 s) at 25 μm, 50 μm, and 100 μm from the eroded surface and at 25 μm, 75 μm, and 125 μm from the enamel bond interface. Results: Regarding microleakage, 7.5% of the samples showed no dye infiltration, 30% showed dye infiltration only at the enamel interface, and 62.5% showed dye infiltration through the dentin–enamel junction, with no difference between groups (p≥0.05). No significant difference was observed in CSMH at different depths (two-way ANOVA, p≥0.05). Conclusions: We did not observe significant changes in microleakage or CSMH after erosive/abrasive challenges in deciduous teeth treated with different adhesive protocols (etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesives, with and without fluoride).
id UFRGS-2_01a82576db2225b1a854b904e17b2570
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/180692
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Assunção, Cristiane MeiraSilva, Marcelo Goulart Rodrigues daEssvein, Tattiana EnrichSantos, Nicole Marchioro dosErhardt, Maria Carolina GuilhermeLussi, AdrianRodrigues, Jonas de Almeida2018-07-28T02:46:02Z20181678-7757http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180692001060664Objective: To evaluate the effect of erosive challenges on the toothrestoration interface of deciduous teeth treated with different adhesive protocols. Material and Methods: Deciduous molars were cut mesiodistally, then embedded, abraded and polished (n=80). Samples were randomly divided according to the adhesive system used into: G1 (Adper Single Bond2®, etch-and-rinse), G2 (Universal Single Bond®, self-etching), G3 (OptibondFL®, etch-and-rinse with Fluoride) and G4 (BondForce®, self-etching with Fluoride). After standardized cavity preparation (2 mm diameter x 2 mm depth), adhesive systems were applied and samples were restored (composite resin Z350®). Half of the samples were exposed to erosive/abrasive cycles (n=10, each adhesive group), and the other half (control group; n=10) remained immersed in artificial saliva. For microleakage analysis, samples were submersed in methylene blue and analyzed at 40x magnifications. Cross-sectional microhardness (CSMH) was carried out (50 g/5 s) at 25 μm, 50 μm, and 100 μm from the eroded surface and at 25 μm, 75 μm, and 125 μm from the enamel bond interface. Results: Regarding microleakage, 7.5% of the samples showed no dye infiltration, 30% showed dye infiltration only at the enamel interface, and 62.5% showed dye infiltration through the dentin–enamel junction, with no difference between groups (p≥0.05). No significant difference was observed in CSMH at different depths (two-way ANOVA, p≥0.05). Conclusions: We did not observe significant changes in microleakage or CSMH after erosive/abrasive challenges in deciduous teeth treated with different adhesive protocols (etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesives, with and without fluoride).application/pdfengJournal of applied oral science. Bauru. Vol. 26 (2018), p. 1-8Erosão dentáriaDentes decíduosDeciduous toothErosive tooth wearAdhesiveTooth erosionTooth wearEffect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro studyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL001060664.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf415565http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180692/1/001060664.pdfaab5d07c01d4da86c00189795d4a0085MD51TEXT001060664.pdf.txt001060664.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain34380http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180692/2/001060664.pdf.txtd46ac1755476c4fec804dcc6853869e4MD52THUMBNAIL001060664.pdf.jpg001060664.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1977http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180692/3/001060664.pdf.jpgadf7e7bad3bd2e858748bb5a8aea255aMD5310183/1806922018-10-05 07:32:09.126oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/180692Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2018-10-05T10:32:09Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Effect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro study
title Effect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro study
spellingShingle Effect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro study
Assunção, Cristiane Meira
Erosão dentária
Dentes decíduos
Deciduous tooth
Erosive tooth wear
Adhesive
Tooth erosion
Tooth wear
title_short Effect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro study
title_full Effect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro study
title_fullStr Effect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro study
title_sort Effect of erosive challenges on deciduous teeth undergoing restorative procedures with different adhesive protocols - an in vitro study
author Assunção, Cristiane Meira
author_facet Assunção, Cristiane Meira
Silva, Marcelo Goulart Rodrigues da
Essvein, Tattiana Enrich
Santos, Nicole Marchioro dos
Erhardt, Maria Carolina Guilherme
Lussi, Adrian
Rodrigues, Jonas de Almeida
author_role author
author2 Silva, Marcelo Goulart Rodrigues da
Essvein, Tattiana Enrich
Santos, Nicole Marchioro dos
Erhardt, Maria Carolina Guilherme
Lussi, Adrian
Rodrigues, Jonas de Almeida
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Assunção, Cristiane Meira
Silva, Marcelo Goulart Rodrigues da
Essvein, Tattiana Enrich
Santos, Nicole Marchioro dos
Erhardt, Maria Carolina Guilherme
Lussi, Adrian
Rodrigues, Jonas de Almeida
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Erosão dentária
Dentes decíduos
topic Erosão dentária
Dentes decíduos
Deciduous tooth
Erosive tooth wear
Adhesive
Tooth erosion
Tooth wear
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Deciduous tooth
Erosive tooth wear
Adhesive
Tooth erosion
Tooth wear
description Objective: To evaluate the effect of erosive challenges on the toothrestoration interface of deciduous teeth treated with different adhesive protocols. Material and Methods: Deciduous molars were cut mesiodistally, then embedded, abraded and polished (n=80). Samples were randomly divided according to the adhesive system used into: G1 (Adper Single Bond2®, etch-and-rinse), G2 (Universal Single Bond®, self-etching), G3 (OptibondFL®, etch-and-rinse with Fluoride) and G4 (BondForce®, self-etching with Fluoride). After standardized cavity preparation (2 mm diameter x 2 mm depth), adhesive systems were applied and samples were restored (composite resin Z350®). Half of the samples were exposed to erosive/abrasive cycles (n=10, each adhesive group), and the other half (control group; n=10) remained immersed in artificial saliva. For microleakage analysis, samples were submersed in methylene blue and analyzed at 40x magnifications. Cross-sectional microhardness (CSMH) was carried out (50 g/5 s) at 25 μm, 50 μm, and 100 μm from the eroded surface and at 25 μm, 75 μm, and 125 μm from the enamel bond interface. Results: Regarding microleakage, 7.5% of the samples showed no dye infiltration, 30% showed dye infiltration only at the enamel interface, and 62.5% showed dye infiltration through the dentin–enamel junction, with no difference between groups (p≥0.05). No significant difference was observed in CSMH at different depths (two-way ANOVA, p≥0.05). Conclusions: We did not observe significant changes in microleakage or CSMH after erosive/abrasive challenges in deciduous teeth treated with different adhesive protocols (etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesives, with and without fluoride).
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-07-28T02:46:02Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180692
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1678-7757
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001060664
identifier_str_mv 1678-7757
001060664
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180692
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science. Bauru. Vol. 26 (2018), p. 1-8
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180692/1/001060664.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180692/2/001060664.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180692/3/001060664.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv aab5d07c01d4da86c00189795d4a0085
d46ac1755476c4fec804dcc6853869e4
adf7e7bad3bd2e858748bb5a8aea255a
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224947505299456