A comparison of data mining techniques and multi-sensor analysis for inland marshes delineation

• Autor(a) principal: Simioni, João Paulo Delapasse
• Data de Publicação: 2020
• Outros Autores: Guasselli, Laurindo Antônio, Oliveira, Guilherme Garcia de, Ruiz, Luis Fernando Chimelo, Oliveira, Gabriel de
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/250035
• topic: Gerenciamento remoto; Imagens SAR

Inland Marsh (IM) is a type of wetland characterized by the presence of non-woody plants as grasses, reeds or sedges, with a water surface smaller than 25% of the area. Historically, these areas have been suffering impacts related to pollution by urban, industrial and agrochemical waste, as well as drainage for agriculture. The IM delineation allows to understand the vegetation and hydrodynamic dynamics and also to monitor the degradation caused by human-induced activities. This work aimed to compare four machine learning algorithms (classification and regression tree (CART), artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF), and k-nearest neighbors (k-NN)) using active and passive remote sensing data in order to address the following questions: (1) which of the four machine learning methods has the greatest potential for inland marshes delineation? (2) are SAR features more important for inland marshes delineation than optical features? and (3) what are the most accurate classification parameters for inland marshes delineation? To address these questions, we used data from Sentinel 1A and Alos Palsar I (SAR) and Sentinel 2A (optical) sensors, in a geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) approach. In addition, we performed a vectorization of a 1975 Brazilian Army topographic chart (first official document presenting marsh boundaries) in order to quantify the marsh area losses between 1975 and 2018 by comparing it with a Sentinel 2A image. Our results showed that the method with the highest overall accuracy was k-NN, with 98.5%. The accuracies for the RF, ANN, and CART methods were 98.3%, 96.0% and 95.5%, respectively. The four classifiers presented accuracies exceeding 95%, showing that all methods have potential for inland marsh delineation. However, we note that the classification results have a great dependence on the input layers. Regarding the importance of the features, SAR images were more important in RF and ANN models, especially in the HV, HV + VH and VH channels of the Alos Palsar I L-band satellite, while spectral indices from optical images were more important in the marshes delineation with the CART method. In addition, we found that the CART and ANN methods presented the largest variations of the overall accuracy (OA) in relation to the different parameters tested. The multi-sensor approach was critical for the high OA values found in the IM delineation (> 95%). The four machine learning methods can be accurately applied for IM delineation, acting as an important low-cost tool for monitoring and managing these environments, in the face of advances in agriculture, soil degradation and pollution of water resources due to agrochemical dumping.