Effectiveness of multidisciplinary intervention on blood pressure control in primary health care : a randomized clinical trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Notti, Regina Kuhmmer
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Lazzaretti, Rosmeri Kuhmmer, Guterres, Cátia Moreira, Raimundo, Fabiana Viegas, Leite, Leni Everson Araújo, Delabary, Tássia Scholante, Caon, Suhélen, Bastos, Gisele Alsina Nader, Polanczyk, Carisi Anne
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/158783
Resumo: Background: Hypertension is a public health problem and a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary program based on group and individual care versus group-only care, to promote blood pressure control in hypertensive patients in primary health care. Methods: Randomized controlled clinical trial. The study was conducted within the primary health care, in two units of the Family Health Strategy, covering 11,000 individuals, in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Two hundred and 56 patients, older than 40 years old and with uncontrolled hypertension, systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg or ≥130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥80 mmHg for individuals with diabetes. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to a health care program aiming for blood pressure control, with the multidisciplinary program group or with the multidisciplinary program plus personalized care group. Primary outcome measures were reduction in systolic BP from baseline to 6 months. Secondary measures included proportion of patients with systolic or diastolic BP controlled. Student t test, Pearson’s chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed-ranks test and generalized estimating equation (GEE) model were used in the analysis. Results: The baseline characteristics of participants were similar between groups. After 6 months of follow-up, systolic BP decreased markedly in both groups (Δ - 11.8 mmHg [SD, 20.2] in the multidisciplinary program group and Δ - 12.9 mmHg [SD, 19.2] in the personalized care group; p < 0.001). Similarly, we noted a significant change in diastolic BP over time in both groups (Δ - 8.1 mmHg [SD, 10.8] in the multidisciplinary program group and Δ - 7. 0 mmHg [SD, 11.5] in the personalized care group; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The study demonstrates similar effectiveness of a group intervention in comparison to a personalized education program in hypertension patients to achieve BP control. These findings indicate that the intervention can be for all hypertensive patients assisted in primary health care.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT01696318 (May 2013).
id UFRGS-2_0f11cfaa9c8b070ead997cc1c9b22c2d
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/158783
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Notti, Regina KuhmmerLazzaretti, Rosmeri KuhmmerGuterres, Cátia MoreiraRaimundo, Fabiana ViegasLeite, Leni Everson AraújoDelabary, Tássia ScholanteCaon, SuhélenBastos, Gisele Alsina NaderPolanczyk, Carisi Anne2017-05-30T02:37:50Z20161472-6963http://hdl.handle.net/10183/158783001014193Background: Hypertension is a public health problem and a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary program based on group and individual care versus group-only care, to promote blood pressure control in hypertensive patients in primary health care. Methods: Randomized controlled clinical trial. The study was conducted within the primary health care, in two units of the Family Health Strategy, covering 11,000 individuals, in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Two hundred and 56 patients, older than 40 years old and with uncontrolled hypertension, systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg or ≥130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥80 mmHg for individuals with diabetes. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to a health care program aiming for blood pressure control, with the multidisciplinary program group or with the multidisciplinary program plus personalized care group. Primary outcome measures were reduction in systolic BP from baseline to 6 months. Secondary measures included proportion of patients with systolic or diastolic BP controlled. Student t test, Pearson’s chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed-ranks test and generalized estimating equation (GEE) model were used in the analysis. Results: The baseline characteristics of participants were similar between groups. After 6 months of follow-up, systolic BP decreased markedly in both groups (Δ - 11.8 mmHg [SD, 20.2] in the multidisciplinary program group and Δ - 12.9 mmHg [SD, 19.2] in the personalized care group; p < 0.001). Similarly, we noted a significant change in diastolic BP over time in both groups (Δ - 8.1 mmHg [SD, 10.8] in the multidisciplinary program group and Δ - 7. 0 mmHg [SD, 11.5] in the personalized care group; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The study demonstrates similar effectiveness of a group intervention in comparison to a personalized education program in hypertension patients to achieve BP control. These findings indicate that the intervention can be for all hypertensive patients assisted in primary health care.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT01696318 (May 2013).application/pdfengBMC health services research. London. Vol. 16, (Aug. 2016), 456, 13 p.HipertensãoSaúde públicaPressão sanguíneaDiabetes mellitusHypertensionPublic healthMultidisciplinary programSystolic blood pressureDiastolic blood pressureDiabetes MellitusEffectiveness of multidisciplinary intervention on blood pressure control in primary health care : a randomized clinical trialEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL001014193.pdf001014193.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf615406http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/158783/1/001014193.pdf1c11d36c8584c48f7d1fde0458d82ffdMD51TEXT001014193.pdf.txt001014193.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain54396http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/158783/2/001014193.pdf.txtea801c458ba5c1d86be1682f072c03a9MD52THUMBNAIL001014193.pdf.jpg001014193.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1763http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/158783/3/001014193.pdf.jpgb8ec6ddefc97697e638c935017f7c2b9MD5310183/1587832023-05-20 03:53:39.841704oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/158783Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-05-20T06:53:39Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Effectiveness of multidisciplinary intervention on blood pressure control in primary health care : a randomized clinical trial
title Effectiveness of multidisciplinary intervention on blood pressure control in primary health care : a randomized clinical trial
spellingShingle Effectiveness of multidisciplinary intervention on blood pressure control in primary health care : a randomized clinical trial
Notti, Regina Kuhmmer
Hipertensão
Saúde pública
Pressão sanguínea
Diabetes mellitus
Hypertension
Public health
Multidisciplinary program
Systolic blood pressure
Diastolic blood pressure
Diabetes Mellitus
title_short Effectiveness of multidisciplinary intervention on blood pressure control in primary health care : a randomized clinical trial
title_full Effectiveness of multidisciplinary intervention on blood pressure control in primary health care : a randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of multidisciplinary intervention on blood pressure control in primary health care : a randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of multidisciplinary intervention on blood pressure control in primary health care : a randomized clinical trial
title_sort Effectiveness of multidisciplinary intervention on blood pressure control in primary health care : a randomized clinical trial
author Notti, Regina Kuhmmer
author_facet Notti, Regina Kuhmmer
Lazzaretti, Rosmeri Kuhmmer
Guterres, Cátia Moreira
Raimundo, Fabiana Viegas
Leite, Leni Everson Araújo
Delabary, Tássia Scholante
Caon, Suhélen
Bastos, Gisele Alsina Nader
Polanczyk, Carisi Anne
author_role author
author2 Lazzaretti, Rosmeri Kuhmmer
Guterres, Cátia Moreira
Raimundo, Fabiana Viegas
Leite, Leni Everson Araújo
Delabary, Tássia Scholante
Caon, Suhélen
Bastos, Gisele Alsina Nader
Polanczyk, Carisi Anne
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Notti, Regina Kuhmmer
Lazzaretti, Rosmeri Kuhmmer
Guterres, Cátia Moreira
Raimundo, Fabiana Viegas
Leite, Leni Everson Araújo
Delabary, Tássia Scholante
Caon, Suhélen
Bastos, Gisele Alsina Nader
Polanczyk, Carisi Anne
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hipertensão
Saúde pública
Pressão sanguínea
Diabetes mellitus
topic Hipertensão
Saúde pública
Pressão sanguínea
Diabetes mellitus
Hypertension
Public health
Multidisciplinary program
Systolic blood pressure
Diastolic blood pressure
Diabetes Mellitus
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Hypertension
Public health
Multidisciplinary program
Systolic blood pressure
Diastolic blood pressure
Diabetes Mellitus
description Background: Hypertension is a public health problem and a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary program based on group and individual care versus group-only care, to promote blood pressure control in hypertensive patients in primary health care. Methods: Randomized controlled clinical trial. The study was conducted within the primary health care, in two units of the Family Health Strategy, covering 11,000 individuals, in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Two hundred and 56 patients, older than 40 years old and with uncontrolled hypertension, systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg or ≥130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥80 mmHg for individuals with diabetes. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to a health care program aiming for blood pressure control, with the multidisciplinary program group or with the multidisciplinary program plus personalized care group. Primary outcome measures were reduction in systolic BP from baseline to 6 months. Secondary measures included proportion of patients with systolic or diastolic BP controlled. Student t test, Pearson’s chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed-ranks test and generalized estimating equation (GEE) model were used in the analysis. Results: The baseline characteristics of participants were similar between groups. After 6 months of follow-up, systolic BP decreased markedly in both groups (Δ - 11.8 mmHg [SD, 20.2] in the multidisciplinary program group and Δ - 12.9 mmHg [SD, 19.2] in the personalized care group; p < 0.001). Similarly, we noted a significant change in diastolic BP over time in both groups (Δ - 8.1 mmHg [SD, 10.8] in the multidisciplinary program group and Δ - 7. 0 mmHg [SD, 11.5] in the personalized care group; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The study demonstrates similar effectiveness of a group intervention in comparison to a personalized education program in hypertension patients to achieve BP control. These findings indicate that the intervention can be for all hypertensive patients assisted in primary health care.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT01696318 (May 2013).
publishDate 2016
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-05-30T02:37:50Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/158783
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1472-6963
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001014193
identifier_str_mv 1472-6963
001014193
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/158783
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv BMC health services research. London. Vol. 16, (Aug. 2016), 456, 13 p.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/158783/1/001014193.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/158783/2/001014193.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/158783/3/001014193.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 1c11d36c8584c48f7d1fde0458d82ffd
ea801c458ba5c1d86be1682f072c03a9
b8ec6ddefc97697e638c935017f7c2b9
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224916725399552