Comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes : a cross-sectional study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150415 |
Resumo: | Background: Adherence to treatment has been defined as the degree to which a patient’s behavior corresponds to medical or health advice; however, the most appropriate method to evaluate adherence to diabetes care has yet to be identified. We conducted analyses to compare adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures with regard to their ability to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes. Methods: We analyzed four instruments to evaluate adherence: Self-Care Inventory-Revised, a self-administered survey; Diabetes Self-Monitoring Profile (DSMP), administered by trained researchers; a categorical (yes/no/sometimes) adherence self-evaluation; and a continuous (0–100) adherence self-evaluation. Blood glucose monitoring frequency was evaluated by self-report, diary, and meter download. Results: Participants (n = 82) were aged 39.0 ± 13.1 years with a mean diabetes duration of 21.2 ± 11.1 years; 27 % monitored blood glucose >4 times/day. The DSMP score was the strongest predictor of glycemic control (r = −0.32, P = 0.004) among adherence assessments, while blood glucose monitoring frequency assessed by meter download was the strongest predictor among blood glucose monitoring measures (r = −40, P < 0.001). All the self-report assessments had a significant but weak correlation with glycemic control (r ≤ 0.28, P ≤ 0.02). The final adjusted model identified the assessment of blood glucose monitoring frequency by meter download as the most robust predictor of HbA1c (estimate effect size = −0.58, P = 0.003). Conclusions: In efforts to evaluate adherence, blood glucose monitoring frequency assessed by meter download has the strongest relationship with glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes. |
id |
UFRGS-2_14793e2f1681a83415a4c25e2133a2b4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/150415 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Teló, Gabriela HeidenSouza, Martina Schaan deAndrade, Thaís StürmerSchaan, Beatriz D'Agord2017-01-04T02:26:54Z20161758-5996http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150415001008486Background: Adherence to treatment has been defined as the degree to which a patient’s behavior corresponds to medical or health advice; however, the most appropriate method to evaluate adherence to diabetes care has yet to be identified. We conducted analyses to compare adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures with regard to their ability to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes. Methods: We analyzed four instruments to evaluate adherence: Self-Care Inventory-Revised, a self-administered survey; Diabetes Self-Monitoring Profile (DSMP), administered by trained researchers; a categorical (yes/no/sometimes) adherence self-evaluation; and a continuous (0–100) adherence self-evaluation. Blood glucose monitoring frequency was evaluated by self-report, diary, and meter download. Results: Participants (n = 82) were aged 39.0 ± 13.1 years with a mean diabetes duration of 21.2 ± 11.1 years; 27 % monitored blood glucose >4 times/day. The DSMP score was the strongest predictor of glycemic control (r = −0.32, P = 0.004) among adherence assessments, while blood glucose monitoring frequency assessed by meter download was the strongest predictor among blood glucose monitoring measures (r = −40, P < 0.001). All the self-report assessments had a significant but weak correlation with glycemic control (r ≤ 0.28, P ≤ 0.02). The final adjusted model identified the assessment of blood glucose monitoring frequency by meter download as the most robust predictor of HbA1c (estimate effect size = −0.58, P = 0.003). Conclusions: In efforts to evaluate adherence, blood glucose monitoring frequency assessed by meter download has the strongest relationship with glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes.application/pdfengDiabetology & metabolic syndrome [recurso eletrônico]. London. Vol. 8 (Jul. 2016), 54, [6] f.Diabetes mellitus tipo 1Adesão à medicaçãoAutomonitorização da glicemiaDiabetes mellitusType 1Medication adherenceBlood glucose monitoringComparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes : a cross-sectional studyEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL001008486.pdf001008486.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1134859http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150415/1/001008486.pdf244361145f13ed55a5a554918cf2fcc0MD51TEXT001008486.pdf.txt001008486.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain29572http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150415/2/001008486.pdf.txt5215a910854d72c3c3f694f0527d2c0aMD52THUMBNAIL001008486.pdf.jpg001008486.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2003http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150415/3/001008486.pdf.jpg7b5ea350b1610aaa0dadd557728252bdMD5310183/1504152023-05-17 03:30:35.120636oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/150415Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-05-17T06:30:35Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes : a cross-sectional study |
title |
Comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes : a cross-sectional study |
spellingShingle |
Comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes : a cross-sectional study Teló, Gabriela Heiden Diabetes mellitus tipo 1 Adesão à medicação Automonitorização da glicemia Diabetes mellitus Type 1 Medication adherence Blood glucose monitoring |
title_short |
Comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes : a cross-sectional study |
title_full |
Comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes : a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr |
Comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes : a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes : a cross-sectional study |
title_sort |
Comparison between adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes : a cross-sectional study |
author |
Teló, Gabriela Heiden |
author_facet |
Teló, Gabriela Heiden Souza, Martina Schaan de Andrade, Thaís Stürmer Schaan, Beatriz D'Agord |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Souza, Martina Schaan de Andrade, Thaís Stürmer Schaan, Beatriz D'Agord |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Teló, Gabriela Heiden Souza, Martina Schaan de Andrade, Thaís Stürmer Schaan, Beatriz D'Agord |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Diabetes mellitus tipo 1 Adesão à medicação Automonitorização da glicemia |
topic |
Diabetes mellitus tipo 1 Adesão à medicação Automonitorização da glicemia Diabetes mellitus Type 1 Medication adherence Blood glucose monitoring |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Diabetes mellitus Type 1 Medication adherence Blood glucose monitoring |
description |
Background: Adherence to treatment has been defined as the degree to which a patient’s behavior corresponds to medical or health advice; however, the most appropriate method to evaluate adherence to diabetes care has yet to be identified. We conducted analyses to compare adherence assessments and blood glucose monitoring measures with regard to their ability to predict glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes. Methods: We analyzed four instruments to evaluate adherence: Self-Care Inventory-Revised, a self-administered survey; Diabetes Self-Monitoring Profile (DSMP), administered by trained researchers; a categorical (yes/no/sometimes) adherence self-evaluation; and a continuous (0–100) adherence self-evaluation. Blood glucose monitoring frequency was evaluated by self-report, diary, and meter download. Results: Participants (n = 82) were aged 39.0 ± 13.1 years with a mean diabetes duration of 21.2 ± 11.1 years; 27 % monitored blood glucose >4 times/day. The DSMP score was the strongest predictor of glycemic control (r = −0.32, P = 0.004) among adherence assessments, while blood glucose monitoring frequency assessed by meter download was the strongest predictor among blood glucose monitoring measures (r = −40, P < 0.001). All the self-report assessments had a significant but weak correlation with glycemic control (r ≤ 0.28, P ≤ 0.02). The final adjusted model identified the assessment of blood glucose monitoring frequency by meter download as the most robust predictor of HbA1c (estimate effect size = −0.58, P = 0.003). Conclusions: In efforts to evaluate adherence, blood glucose monitoring frequency assessed by meter download has the strongest relationship with glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2016 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-04T02:26:54Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150415 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1758-5996 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001008486 |
identifier_str_mv |
1758-5996 001008486 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/150415 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Diabetology & metabolic syndrome [recurso eletrônico]. London. Vol. 8 (Jul. 2016), 54, [6] f. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150415/1/001008486.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150415/2/001008486.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/150415/3/001008486.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
244361145f13ed55a5a554918cf2fcc0 5215a910854d72c3c3f694f0527d2c0a 7b5ea350b1610aaa0dadd557728252bd |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447627019321344 |