Approaches to capturing the black and white Tegu Salvator merianae (Squamata: Teiidae)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vieira, Renata Cardoso
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Arthur Schramm de, Fagundes, Nelson Jurandi Rosa, Verrastro Viñas, Laura
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180705
Resumo: The use of traps is extremely important in several types of ecological studies, and may assist in the capture of individuals in areas that are difficult to access. In the present study, we compared the effectiveness of wooden (Schramm) versus “Tomahawk” traps to capture Salvator merianae (Duméril & Bibron, 1839) lizards. The study was conducted in Eldorado do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Field data were collected from August 2013 to March 2015, during the reproductive period of the species. The study involved two types of baited traps: i) “Tomahawk”, made of galvanized steel; and ii) Schramm, a wooden trap. The capture rate of the Schramm wooden traps was 1.63 individuals/ day, and of the “Tomahawk” was 0.36 individuals/day. These results are important for researchers working with large lizards and may help to increase sampling efficiency for these organisms.
id UFRGS-2_16db4665a9d225db0dcb8e73139ddafe
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/180705
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Vieira, Renata CardosoOliveira, Arthur Schramm deFagundes, Nelson Jurandi RosaVerrastro Viñas, Laura2018-07-28T02:46:05Z20150101-8175http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180705001066923The use of traps is extremely important in several types of ecological studies, and may assist in the capture of individuals in areas that are difficult to access. In the present study, we compared the effectiveness of wooden (Schramm) versus “Tomahawk” traps to capture Salvator merianae (Duméril & Bibron, 1839) lizards. The study was conducted in Eldorado do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Field data were collected from August 2013 to March 2015, during the reproductive period of the species. The study involved two types of baited traps: i) “Tomahawk”, made of galvanized steel; and ii) Schramm, a wooden trap. The capture rate of the Schramm wooden traps was 1.63 individuals/ day, and of the “Tomahawk” was 0.36 individuals/day. These results are important for researchers working with large lizards and may help to increase sampling efficiency for these organisms.application/pdfengRevista Brasileira de Zoologia. São Paulo, SP. Vol. 32, no. 4, (Aug. 2015), p. 317-320CapturaArmadilhasEcologiaCaptureEcologyTrapsTomahawkApproaches to capturing the black and white Tegu Salvator merianae (Squamata: Teiidae)info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL001066923.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf788350http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180705/1/001066923.pdfdc2430a54633c651be6f490462e1bc00MD51TEXT001066923.pdf.txt001066923.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain20451http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180705/2/001066923.pdf.txt1a67612d5dd777b4de3bdf47b8ad3d15MD52THUMBNAIL001066923.pdf.jpg001066923.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1715http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180705/3/001066923.pdf.jpgb281b6145ebdd53ddce9b4c4db92cea0MD5310183/1807052018-10-05 07:32:29.859oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/180705Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2018-10-05T10:32:29Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Approaches to capturing the black and white Tegu Salvator merianae (Squamata: Teiidae)
title Approaches to capturing the black and white Tegu Salvator merianae (Squamata: Teiidae)
spellingShingle Approaches to capturing the black and white Tegu Salvator merianae (Squamata: Teiidae)
Vieira, Renata Cardoso
Captura
Armadilhas
Ecologia
Capture
Ecology
Traps
Tomahawk
title_short Approaches to capturing the black and white Tegu Salvator merianae (Squamata: Teiidae)
title_full Approaches to capturing the black and white Tegu Salvator merianae (Squamata: Teiidae)
title_fullStr Approaches to capturing the black and white Tegu Salvator merianae (Squamata: Teiidae)
title_full_unstemmed Approaches to capturing the black and white Tegu Salvator merianae (Squamata: Teiidae)
title_sort Approaches to capturing the black and white Tegu Salvator merianae (Squamata: Teiidae)
author Vieira, Renata Cardoso
author_facet Vieira, Renata Cardoso
Oliveira, Arthur Schramm de
Fagundes, Nelson Jurandi Rosa
Verrastro Viñas, Laura
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Arthur Schramm de
Fagundes, Nelson Jurandi Rosa
Verrastro Viñas, Laura
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vieira, Renata Cardoso
Oliveira, Arthur Schramm de
Fagundes, Nelson Jurandi Rosa
Verrastro Viñas, Laura
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Captura
Armadilhas
Ecologia
topic Captura
Armadilhas
Ecologia
Capture
Ecology
Traps
Tomahawk
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Capture
Ecology
Traps
Tomahawk
description The use of traps is extremely important in several types of ecological studies, and may assist in the capture of individuals in areas that are difficult to access. In the present study, we compared the effectiveness of wooden (Schramm) versus “Tomahawk” traps to capture Salvator merianae (Duméril & Bibron, 1839) lizards. The study was conducted in Eldorado do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Field data were collected from August 2013 to March 2015, during the reproductive period of the species. The study involved two types of baited traps: i) “Tomahawk”, made of galvanized steel; and ii) Schramm, a wooden trap. The capture rate of the Schramm wooden traps was 1.63 individuals/ day, and of the “Tomahawk” was 0.36 individuals/day. These results are important for researchers working with large lizards and may help to increase sampling efficiency for these organisms.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2015
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-07-28T02:46:05Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180705
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 0101-8175
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001066923
identifier_str_mv 0101-8175
001066923
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/180705
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Zoologia. São Paulo, SP. Vol. 32, no. 4, (Aug. 2015), p. 317-320
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180705/1/001066923.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180705/2/001066923.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/180705/3/001066923.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv dc2430a54633c651be6f490462e1bc00
1a67612d5dd777b4de3bdf47b8ad3d15
b281b6145ebdd53ddce9b4c4db92cea0
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224947522076672

Registros relacionados