Efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Debiasi, Márcio
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Polanczyk, Carisi Anne, Ziegelmann, Patricia Klarmann, Barrios, Carlos Henrique Escosteguy, Cao, Hongyuan, Dignam, James, Bychkovsky, Brittany Louise, Finkelstein, Dianne Madelyn, Guindalini, Rodrigo Santa Cruz, Nunes Filho, Paulo Ricardo Santos, Silva, Caroline Albuquerque Moreira da, Reinert, Tomás, Azambuja, Evandro de, Olopade, Olufunmilayo L.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/181142
Resumo: Background: Several (neo)adjuvant treatments for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have been compared in different randomized clinical trials. Since it is not feasible to conduct adequate pairwise comparative trials of all these therapeutic options, network meta-analysis offers an opportunity for more detailed inference for evidence-based therapy. Methods: Phase II/III randomized clinical trials comparing two or more different (neo) adjuvant treatments for HER2-positive breast cancer patients were included. Relative treatment effects were pooled in two separate network meta-analyses for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: 17 clinical trials met our eligibility criteria. Two different networks of trials were created based on the availability of the outcomes: OS network (15 trials: 37,837 patients); and DFS network (17 trials: 40,992 patients). Two studies—the ExteNET and the NeoSphere trials—were included only in this DFS network because OS data have not yet been reported. The concept of the dual anti-HER2 blockade proved to be the best option in terms of OS and DFS. Chemotherapy (CT) plus trastuzumab (T) and lapatinib (L) and CT + T + Pertuzumab (P) are probably the best treatment options in terms of OS, with 62.47% and 22.06%, respectively. In the DFS network, CT + T + Neratinib (N) was the best treatment option with 50.55%, followed by CT + T + P (26.59%) and CT + T + L (20.62%). Conclusion: This network meta-analysis suggests that dual anti-HER2 blockade with trastuzumab plus either lapatinib or pertuzumab are probably the best treatment options in the (neo)adjuvant setting for HER2-positive breast cancer patients in terms of OS gain. Mature OS results are still expected for the Aphinity trial and for the sequential use of trastuzumab followed by neratinib, the treatment that showed the best performance in terms of DFS in our analysis.
id UFRGS-2_1790748ad08741b7da7d1927f5894864
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/181142
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Debiasi, MárcioPolanczyk, Carisi AnneZiegelmann, Patricia KlarmannBarrios, Carlos Henrique EscosteguyCao, HongyuanDignam, JamesBychkovsky, Brittany LouiseFinkelstein, Dianne MadelynGuindalini, Rodrigo Santa CruzNunes Filho, Paulo Ricardo SantosSilva, Caroline Albuquerque Moreira daReinert, TomásAzambuja, Evandro deOlopade, Olufunmilayo L.2018-08-18T03:01:25Z20182234-943Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/181142001070608Background: Several (neo)adjuvant treatments for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have been compared in different randomized clinical trials. Since it is not feasible to conduct adequate pairwise comparative trials of all these therapeutic options, network meta-analysis offers an opportunity for more detailed inference for evidence-based therapy. Methods: Phase II/III randomized clinical trials comparing two or more different (neo) adjuvant treatments for HER2-positive breast cancer patients were included. Relative treatment effects were pooled in two separate network meta-analyses for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: 17 clinical trials met our eligibility criteria. Two different networks of trials were created based on the availability of the outcomes: OS network (15 trials: 37,837 patients); and DFS network (17 trials: 40,992 patients). Two studies—the ExteNET and the NeoSphere trials—were included only in this DFS network because OS data have not yet been reported. The concept of the dual anti-HER2 blockade proved to be the best option in terms of OS and DFS. Chemotherapy (CT) plus trastuzumab (T) and lapatinib (L) and CT + T + Pertuzumab (P) are probably the best treatment options in terms of OS, with 62.47% and 22.06%, respectively. In the DFS network, CT + T + Neratinib (N) was the best treatment option with 50.55%, followed by CT + T + P (26.59%) and CT + T + L (20.62%). Conclusion: This network meta-analysis suggests that dual anti-HER2 blockade with trastuzumab plus either lapatinib or pertuzumab are probably the best treatment options in the (neo)adjuvant setting for HER2-positive breast cancer patients in terms of OS gain. Mature OS results are still expected for the Aphinity trial and for the sequential use of trastuzumab followed by neratinib, the treatment that showed the best performance in terms of DFS in our analysis.application/pdfengFrontiers in oncology. [Lausanne : Frontiers Research Foundation]. Vol. 8 (May 2018), 156, 8 p.Neoplasias da mamaReceptor erbB-2TrastuzumabQuimioterapia adjuvanteBreast cancerHER2/ERBB2Adjuvant treatmentNeoadjuvant treatmentMeta-analysisNetwork meta-analysisEfficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysisEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL001070608.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf675902http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/181142/1/001070608.pdf05b31d73811a11f5c3a1ef749c99857fMD51TEXT001070608.pdf.txt001070608.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain41621http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/181142/2/001070608.pdf.txt95dda54dafcf02123d9d950b9c26d799MD52THUMBNAIL001070608.pdf.jpg001070608.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1900http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/181142/3/001070608.pdf.jpg9d3bb120bb39ce7a2430396999cc59d3MD5310183/1811422023-04-20 03:20:49.645272oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/181142Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-04-20T06:20:49Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysis
title Efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysis
spellingShingle Efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysis
Debiasi, Márcio
Neoplasias da mama
Receptor erbB-2
Trastuzumab
Quimioterapia adjuvante
Breast cancer
HER2/ERBB2
Adjuvant treatment
Neoadjuvant treatment
Meta-analysis
Network meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysis
title_sort Efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysis
author Debiasi, Márcio
author_facet Debiasi, Márcio
Polanczyk, Carisi Anne
Ziegelmann, Patricia Klarmann
Barrios, Carlos Henrique Escosteguy
Cao, Hongyuan
Dignam, James
Bychkovsky, Brittany Louise
Finkelstein, Dianne Madelyn
Guindalini, Rodrigo Santa Cruz
Nunes Filho, Paulo Ricardo Santos
Silva, Caroline Albuquerque Moreira da
Reinert, Tomás
Azambuja, Evandro de
Olopade, Olufunmilayo L.
author_role author
author2 Polanczyk, Carisi Anne
Ziegelmann, Patricia Klarmann
Barrios, Carlos Henrique Escosteguy
Cao, Hongyuan
Dignam, James
Bychkovsky, Brittany Louise
Finkelstein, Dianne Madelyn
Guindalini, Rodrigo Santa Cruz
Nunes Filho, Paulo Ricardo Santos
Silva, Caroline Albuquerque Moreira da
Reinert, Tomás
Azambuja, Evandro de
Olopade, Olufunmilayo L.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Debiasi, Márcio
Polanczyk, Carisi Anne
Ziegelmann, Patricia Klarmann
Barrios, Carlos Henrique Escosteguy
Cao, Hongyuan
Dignam, James
Bychkovsky, Brittany Louise
Finkelstein, Dianne Madelyn
Guindalini, Rodrigo Santa Cruz
Nunes Filho, Paulo Ricardo Santos
Silva, Caroline Albuquerque Moreira da
Reinert, Tomás
Azambuja, Evandro de
Olopade, Olufunmilayo L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Neoplasias da mama
Receptor erbB-2
Trastuzumab
Quimioterapia adjuvante
topic Neoplasias da mama
Receptor erbB-2
Trastuzumab
Quimioterapia adjuvante
Breast cancer
HER2/ERBB2
Adjuvant treatment
Neoadjuvant treatment
Meta-analysis
Network meta-analysis
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Breast cancer
HER2/ERBB2
Adjuvant treatment
Neoadjuvant treatment
Meta-analysis
Network meta-analysis
description Background: Several (neo)adjuvant treatments for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have been compared in different randomized clinical trials. Since it is not feasible to conduct adequate pairwise comparative trials of all these therapeutic options, network meta-analysis offers an opportunity for more detailed inference for evidence-based therapy. Methods: Phase II/III randomized clinical trials comparing two or more different (neo) adjuvant treatments for HER2-positive breast cancer patients were included. Relative treatment effects were pooled in two separate network meta-analyses for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: 17 clinical trials met our eligibility criteria. Two different networks of trials were created based on the availability of the outcomes: OS network (15 trials: 37,837 patients); and DFS network (17 trials: 40,992 patients). Two studies—the ExteNET and the NeoSphere trials—were included only in this DFS network because OS data have not yet been reported. The concept of the dual anti-HER2 blockade proved to be the best option in terms of OS and DFS. Chemotherapy (CT) plus trastuzumab (T) and lapatinib (L) and CT + T + Pertuzumab (P) are probably the best treatment options in terms of OS, with 62.47% and 22.06%, respectively. In the DFS network, CT + T + Neratinib (N) was the best treatment option with 50.55%, followed by CT + T + P (26.59%) and CT + T + L (20.62%). Conclusion: This network meta-analysis suggests that dual anti-HER2 blockade with trastuzumab plus either lapatinib or pertuzumab are probably the best treatment options in the (neo)adjuvant setting for HER2-positive breast cancer patients in terms of OS gain. Mature OS results are still expected for the Aphinity trial and for the sequential use of trastuzumab followed by neratinib, the treatment that showed the best performance in terms of DFS in our analysis.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-08-18T03:01:25Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/181142
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 2234-943X
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001070608
identifier_str_mv 2234-943X
001070608
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/181142
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Frontiers in oncology. [Lausanne : Frontiers Research Foundation]. Vol. 8 (May 2018), 156, 8 p.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/181142/1/001070608.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/181142/2/001070608.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/181142/3/001070608.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 05b31d73811a11f5c3a1ef749c99857f
95dda54dafcf02123d9d950b9c26d799
9d3bb120bb39ce7a2430396999cc59d3
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224948320043008