Efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/181142 |
Resumo: | Background: Several (neo)adjuvant treatments for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have been compared in different randomized clinical trials. Since it is not feasible to conduct adequate pairwise comparative trials of all these therapeutic options, network meta-analysis offers an opportunity for more detailed inference for evidence-based therapy. Methods: Phase II/III randomized clinical trials comparing two or more different (neo) adjuvant treatments for HER2-positive breast cancer patients were included. Relative treatment effects were pooled in two separate network meta-analyses for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: 17 clinical trials met our eligibility criteria. Two different networks of trials were created based on the availability of the outcomes: OS network (15 trials: 37,837 patients); and DFS network (17 trials: 40,992 patients). Two studies—the ExteNET and the NeoSphere trials—were included only in this DFS network because OS data have not yet been reported. The concept of the dual anti-HER2 blockade proved to be the best option in terms of OS and DFS. Chemotherapy (CT) plus trastuzumab (T) and lapatinib (L) and CT + T + Pertuzumab (P) are probably the best treatment options in terms of OS, with 62.47% and 22.06%, respectively. In the DFS network, CT + T + Neratinib (N) was the best treatment option with 50.55%, followed by CT + T + P (26.59%) and CT + T + L (20.62%). Conclusion: This network meta-analysis suggests that dual anti-HER2 blockade with trastuzumab plus either lapatinib or pertuzumab are probably the best treatment options in the (neo)adjuvant setting for HER2-positive breast cancer patients in terms of OS gain. Mature OS results are still expected for the Aphinity trial and for the sequential use of trastuzumab followed by neratinib, the treatment that showed the best performance in terms of DFS in our analysis. |
id |
UFRGS-2_1790748ad08741b7da7d1927f5894864 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/181142 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Debiasi, MárcioPolanczyk, Carisi AnneZiegelmann, Patricia KlarmannBarrios, Carlos Henrique EscosteguyCao, HongyuanDignam, JamesBychkovsky, Brittany LouiseFinkelstein, Dianne MadelynGuindalini, Rodrigo Santa CruzNunes Filho, Paulo Ricardo SantosSilva, Caroline Albuquerque Moreira daReinert, TomásAzambuja, Evandro deOlopade, Olufunmilayo L.2018-08-18T03:01:25Z20182234-943Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/181142001070608Background: Several (neo)adjuvant treatments for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have been compared in different randomized clinical trials. Since it is not feasible to conduct adequate pairwise comparative trials of all these therapeutic options, network meta-analysis offers an opportunity for more detailed inference for evidence-based therapy. Methods: Phase II/III randomized clinical trials comparing two or more different (neo) adjuvant treatments for HER2-positive breast cancer patients were included. Relative treatment effects were pooled in two separate network meta-analyses for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: 17 clinical trials met our eligibility criteria. Two different networks of trials were created based on the availability of the outcomes: OS network (15 trials: 37,837 patients); and DFS network (17 trials: 40,992 patients). Two studies—the ExteNET and the NeoSphere trials—were included only in this DFS network because OS data have not yet been reported. The concept of the dual anti-HER2 blockade proved to be the best option in terms of OS and DFS. Chemotherapy (CT) plus trastuzumab (T) and lapatinib (L) and CT + T + Pertuzumab (P) are probably the best treatment options in terms of OS, with 62.47% and 22.06%, respectively. In the DFS network, CT + T + Neratinib (N) was the best treatment option with 50.55%, followed by CT + T + P (26.59%) and CT + T + L (20.62%). Conclusion: This network meta-analysis suggests that dual anti-HER2 blockade with trastuzumab plus either lapatinib or pertuzumab are probably the best treatment options in the (neo)adjuvant setting for HER2-positive breast cancer patients in terms of OS gain. Mature OS results are still expected for the Aphinity trial and for the sequential use of trastuzumab followed by neratinib, the treatment that showed the best performance in terms of DFS in our analysis.application/pdfengFrontiers in oncology. [Lausanne : Frontiers Research Foundation]. Vol. 8 (May 2018), 156, 8 p.Neoplasias da mamaReceptor erbB-2TrastuzumabQuimioterapia adjuvanteBreast cancerHER2/ERBB2Adjuvant treatmentNeoadjuvant treatmentMeta-analysisNetwork meta-analysisEfficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysisEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL001070608.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf675902http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/181142/1/001070608.pdf05b31d73811a11f5c3a1ef749c99857fMD51TEXT001070608.pdf.txt001070608.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain41621http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/181142/2/001070608.pdf.txt95dda54dafcf02123d9d950b9c26d799MD52THUMBNAIL001070608.pdf.jpg001070608.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1900http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/181142/3/001070608.pdf.jpg9d3bb120bb39ce7a2430396999cc59d3MD5310183/1811422023-04-20 03:20:49.645272oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/181142Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestlume@ufrgs.bropendoar:2023-04-20T06:20:49Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysis |
title |
Efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysis Debiasi, Márcio Neoplasias da mama Receptor erbB-2 Trastuzumab Quimioterapia adjuvante Breast cancer HER2/ERBB2 Adjuvant treatment Neoadjuvant treatment Meta-analysis Network meta-analysis |
title_short |
Efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysis |
title_full |
Efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Efficacy of anti-HER2 agents in combination with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early and locally advanced HER2-positive breast cancer patients : a network meta-analysis |
author |
Debiasi, Márcio |
author_facet |
Debiasi, Márcio Polanczyk, Carisi Anne Ziegelmann, Patricia Klarmann Barrios, Carlos Henrique Escosteguy Cao, Hongyuan Dignam, James Bychkovsky, Brittany Louise Finkelstein, Dianne Madelyn Guindalini, Rodrigo Santa Cruz Nunes Filho, Paulo Ricardo Santos Silva, Caroline Albuquerque Moreira da Reinert, Tomás Azambuja, Evandro de Olopade, Olufunmilayo L. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Polanczyk, Carisi Anne Ziegelmann, Patricia Klarmann Barrios, Carlos Henrique Escosteguy Cao, Hongyuan Dignam, James Bychkovsky, Brittany Louise Finkelstein, Dianne Madelyn Guindalini, Rodrigo Santa Cruz Nunes Filho, Paulo Ricardo Santos Silva, Caroline Albuquerque Moreira da Reinert, Tomás Azambuja, Evandro de Olopade, Olufunmilayo L. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Debiasi, Márcio Polanczyk, Carisi Anne Ziegelmann, Patricia Klarmann Barrios, Carlos Henrique Escosteguy Cao, Hongyuan Dignam, James Bychkovsky, Brittany Louise Finkelstein, Dianne Madelyn Guindalini, Rodrigo Santa Cruz Nunes Filho, Paulo Ricardo Santos Silva, Caroline Albuquerque Moreira da Reinert, Tomás Azambuja, Evandro de Olopade, Olufunmilayo L. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Neoplasias da mama Receptor erbB-2 Trastuzumab Quimioterapia adjuvante |
topic |
Neoplasias da mama Receptor erbB-2 Trastuzumab Quimioterapia adjuvante Breast cancer HER2/ERBB2 Adjuvant treatment Neoadjuvant treatment Meta-analysis Network meta-analysis |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Breast cancer HER2/ERBB2 Adjuvant treatment Neoadjuvant treatment Meta-analysis Network meta-analysis |
description |
Background: Several (neo)adjuvant treatments for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have been compared in different randomized clinical trials. Since it is not feasible to conduct adequate pairwise comparative trials of all these therapeutic options, network meta-analysis offers an opportunity for more detailed inference for evidence-based therapy. Methods: Phase II/III randomized clinical trials comparing two or more different (neo) adjuvant treatments for HER2-positive breast cancer patients were included. Relative treatment effects were pooled in two separate network meta-analyses for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: 17 clinical trials met our eligibility criteria. Two different networks of trials were created based on the availability of the outcomes: OS network (15 trials: 37,837 patients); and DFS network (17 trials: 40,992 patients). Two studies—the ExteNET and the NeoSphere trials—were included only in this DFS network because OS data have not yet been reported. The concept of the dual anti-HER2 blockade proved to be the best option in terms of OS and DFS. Chemotherapy (CT) plus trastuzumab (T) and lapatinib (L) and CT + T + Pertuzumab (P) are probably the best treatment options in terms of OS, with 62.47% and 22.06%, respectively. In the DFS network, CT + T + Neratinib (N) was the best treatment option with 50.55%, followed by CT + T + P (26.59%) and CT + T + L (20.62%). Conclusion: This network meta-analysis suggests that dual anti-HER2 blockade with trastuzumab plus either lapatinib or pertuzumab are probably the best treatment options in the (neo)adjuvant setting for HER2-positive breast cancer patients in terms of OS gain. Mature OS results are still expected for the Aphinity trial and for the sequential use of trastuzumab followed by neratinib, the treatment that showed the best performance in terms of DFS in our analysis. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-18T03:01:25Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/181142 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
2234-943X |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001070608 |
identifier_str_mv |
2234-943X 001070608 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/181142 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers in oncology. [Lausanne : Frontiers Research Foundation]. Vol. 8 (May 2018), 156, 8 p. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/181142/1/001070608.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/181142/2/001070608.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/181142/3/001070608.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
05b31d73811a11f5c3a1ef749c99857f 95dda54dafcf02123d9d950b9c26d799 9d3bb120bb39ce7a2430396999cc59d3 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
lume@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1817725028588847104 |