Crack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol users

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marchi, Nino Cesar
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Scherer, Juliana Nichterwitz, Pachado, Mayra Pacheco, Guimarães, Luciano Santos Pinto, Siegmund, Gerson, Castro, Melina Nogueira de, Halpern, Silvia Chwartzmann, Bumaguin, Daniela Benzano, Formigoni, Maria Lucia Oliveira de Souza, Cruz, Marcelo, Pechansky, Flavio, Kessler, Felix Henrique Paim
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/185192
Resumo: Objective: Many studies correlate characteristics of family functioning and the development of drug addiction. This study sought to evaluate and compare the family environment styles of two groups of psychoactive substance users: 1) alcohol-only users and 2) crack-cocaine users. Methods: Three hundred and sixty-four users of alcohol, crack-cocaine, and other drugs, recruited from research centers in four Brazilian capitals participated in this study. Subjects were evaluated through the Family Environment Scale and the Addiction Severity Index, 6th version (ASI-6). ASI-6 t-scores were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc tests. A final model was obtained using a logistic regression analysis. All analyses were adjusted for partner, age, and psychiatric t-score. Results: We found a significant difference between groups in the cohesion subscale (p = 0.044). The post-hoc test revealed a difference of 1.06 points (95%CI 0.11-2.01) between groups 1 (6.4560.28) and 2 (5.3860.20). No significant between-group differences were observed in the other subscales. However, categorical analyses of variables regarding family dynamic showed that crack users more often reported that sometimes people in their family hit each other (30.4% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.007) and that people in their family frequently compared each other regarding work and/or school achievement (57.2% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.041). Conclusion: These results suggest that families of crack-cocaine users are less cohesive than families of alcohol users. This type of family environment may affect treatment outcome, and should thus be adequately approached.
id UFRGS-2_1ad41b853cd10c4e855b74cac6ea621a
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/185192
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Marchi, Nino CesarScherer, Juliana NichterwitzPachado, Mayra PachecoGuimarães, Luciano Santos PintoSiegmund, GersonCastro, Melina Nogueira deHalpern, Silvia ChwartzmannBumaguin, Daniela BenzanoFormigoni, Maria Lucia Oliveira de SouzaCruz, MarceloPechansky, FlavioKessler, Felix Henrique Paim2018-11-28T02:45:48Z20171516-4446http://hdl.handle.net/10183/185192001081881Objective: Many studies correlate characteristics of family functioning and the development of drug addiction. This study sought to evaluate and compare the family environment styles of two groups of psychoactive substance users: 1) alcohol-only users and 2) crack-cocaine users. Methods: Three hundred and sixty-four users of alcohol, crack-cocaine, and other drugs, recruited from research centers in four Brazilian capitals participated in this study. Subjects were evaluated through the Family Environment Scale and the Addiction Severity Index, 6th version (ASI-6). ASI-6 t-scores were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc tests. A final model was obtained using a logistic regression analysis. All analyses were adjusted for partner, age, and psychiatric t-score. Results: We found a significant difference between groups in the cohesion subscale (p = 0.044). The post-hoc test revealed a difference of 1.06 points (95%CI 0.11-2.01) between groups 1 (6.4560.28) and 2 (5.3860.20). No significant between-group differences were observed in the other subscales. However, categorical analyses of variables regarding family dynamic showed that crack users more often reported that sometimes people in their family hit each other (30.4% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.007) and that people in their family frequently compared each other regarding work and/or school achievement (57.2% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.041). Conclusion: These results suggest that families of crack-cocaine users are less cohesive than families of alcohol users. This type of family environment may affect treatment outcome, and should thus be adequately approached.application/pdfengRevista brasileira de psiquiatria (1999). São Paulo. vol. 39, n. 4 (out./dez. 2017), p. 346-351.Relações familiaresTranstornos relacionados ao uso de cocaínaTranstornos relacionados ao uso de álcoolFamilyFamily relationshipsCohesionSubstance abuseAlcohol useCrack-cocaine useCrack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol usersinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001081881.pdf.txt001081881.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain28700http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/185192/2/001081881.pdf.txt4ff2f7eafff5d35ee4a7aa06ea2e80d2MD52ORIGINAL001081881.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf83109http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/185192/1/001081881.pdf914026034e6f4ac2c738d6398346e9a5MD5110183/1851922019-06-14 02:31:23.532396oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/185192Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2019-06-14T05:31:23Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Crack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol users
title Crack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol users
spellingShingle Crack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol users
Marchi, Nino Cesar
Relações familiares
Transtornos relacionados ao uso de cocaína
Transtornos relacionados ao uso de álcool
Family
Family relationships
Cohesion
Substance abuse
Alcohol use
Crack-cocaine use
title_short Crack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol users
title_full Crack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol users
title_fullStr Crack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol users
title_full_unstemmed Crack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol users
title_sort Crack-cocaine users have less family cohesion than alcohol users
author Marchi, Nino Cesar
author_facet Marchi, Nino Cesar
Scherer, Juliana Nichterwitz
Pachado, Mayra Pacheco
Guimarães, Luciano Santos Pinto
Siegmund, Gerson
Castro, Melina Nogueira de
Halpern, Silvia Chwartzmann
Bumaguin, Daniela Benzano
Formigoni, Maria Lucia Oliveira de Souza
Cruz, Marcelo
Pechansky, Flavio
Kessler, Felix Henrique Paim
author_role author
author2 Scherer, Juliana Nichterwitz
Pachado, Mayra Pacheco
Guimarães, Luciano Santos Pinto
Siegmund, Gerson
Castro, Melina Nogueira de
Halpern, Silvia Chwartzmann
Bumaguin, Daniela Benzano
Formigoni, Maria Lucia Oliveira de Souza
Cruz, Marcelo
Pechansky, Flavio
Kessler, Felix Henrique Paim
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marchi, Nino Cesar
Scherer, Juliana Nichterwitz
Pachado, Mayra Pacheco
Guimarães, Luciano Santos Pinto
Siegmund, Gerson
Castro, Melina Nogueira de
Halpern, Silvia Chwartzmann
Bumaguin, Daniela Benzano
Formigoni, Maria Lucia Oliveira de Souza
Cruz, Marcelo
Pechansky, Flavio
Kessler, Felix Henrique Paim
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Relações familiares
Transtornos relacionados ao uso de cocaína
Transtornos relacionados ao uso de álcool
topic Relações familiares
Transtornos relacionados ao uso de cocaína
Transtornos relacionados ao uso de álcool
Family
Family relationships
Cohesion
Substance abuse
Alcohol use
Crack-cocaine use
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Family
Family relationships
Cohesion
Substance abuse
Alcohol use
Crack-cocaine use
description Objective: Many studies correlate characteristics of family functioning and the development of drug addiction. This study sought to evaluate and compare the family environment styles of two groups of psychoactive substance users: 1) alcohol-only users and 2) crack-cocaine users. Methods: Three hundred and sixty-four users of alcohol, crack-cocaine, and other drugs, recruited from research centers in four Brazilian capitals participated in this study. Subjects were evaluated through the Family Environment Scale and the Addiction Severity Index, 6th version (ASI-6). ASI-6 t-scores were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc tests. A final model was obtained using a logistic regression analysis. All analyses were adjusted for partner, age, and psychiatric t-score. Results: We found a significant difference between groups in the cohesion subscale (p = 0.044). The post-hoc test revealed a difference of 1.06 points (95%CI 0.11-2.01) between groups 1 (6.4560.28) and 2 (5.3860.20). No significant between-group differences were observed in the other subscales. However, categorical analyses of variables regarding family dynamic showed that crack users more often reported that sometimes people in their family hit each other (30.4% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.007) and that people in their family frequently compared each other regarding work and/or school achievement (57.2% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.041). Conclusion: These results suggest that families of crack-cocaine users are less cohesive than families of alcohol users. This type of family environment may affect treatment outcome, and should thus be adequately approached.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-11-28T02:45:48Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/185192
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1516-4446
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001081881
identifier_str_mv 1516-4446
001081881
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/185192
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (1999). São Paulo. vol. 39, n. 4 (out./dez. 2017), p. 346-351.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/185192/2/001081881.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/185192/1/001081881.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 4ff2f7eafff5d35ee4a7aa06ea2e80d2
914026034e6f4ac2c738d6398346e9a5
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1815447675459338240