The brain decade in debate : I. Neurobiology of learning and memory
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2000 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/21168 |
Resumo: | This article is a transcription of an electronic symposium in which some active researchers were invited by the Brazilian Society for Neuroscience and Behavior (SBNeC) to discuss the last decade’s advances in neurobiology of learning and memory. The way different parts of the brain are recruited during the storage of different kinds of memory (e.g., short-term vs long-term memory, declarative vs procedural memory) and even the property of these divisions were discussed. It was pointed out that the brain does not really store memories, but stores traces of information that are later used to create memories, not always expressing a completely veridical picture of the past experienced reality. To perform this process different parts of the brain act as important nodes of the neural network that encode, store and retrieve the information that will be used to create memories. Some of the brain regions are recognizably active during the activation of short-term working memory (e.g., prefrontal cortex), or the storage of information retrieved as long-term explicit memories (e.g., hippocampus and related cortical areas) or the modulation of the storage of memories related to emotional events (e.g., amygdala). This does not mean that there is a separate neural structure completely supporting the storage of each kind of memory but means that these memories critically depend on the functioning of these neural structures. The current view is that there is no sense in talking about hippocampusbased or amygdala-based memory since this implies that there is a oneto- one correspondence. The present question to be solved is how systems interact in memory. The pertinence of attributing a critical role to cellular processes like synaptic tagging and protein kinase A activation to explain the memory storage processes at the cellular level was also discussed. |
id |
UFRGS-2_2db8b311185c63a961988a51b4ab7780 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/21168 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Baddeley, AlanBueno, OrlandoCahill, LarryFuster, Joaquin M.Izquierdo, Ivan AntonioMcGaugh, James L.Morris, RichardNadel, LynnRouttenberg, AryehXavier, Gilberto FernandoDa Cunha, Claudio2010-04-24T04:15:33Z20000100-879Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/21168000297752This article is a transcription of an electronic symposium in which some active researchers were invited by the Brazilian Society for Neuroscience and Behavior (SBNeC) to discuss the last decade’s advances in neurobiology of learning and memory. The way different parts of the brain are recruited during the storage of different kinds of memory (e.g., short-term vs long-term memory, declarative vs procedural memory) and even the property of these divisions were discussed. It was pointed out that the brain does not really store memories, but stores traces of information that are later used to create memories, not always expressing a completely veridical picture of the past experienced reality. To perform this process different parts of the brain act as important nodes of the neural network that encode, store and retrieve the information that will be used to create memories. Some of the brain regions are recognizably active during the activation of short-term working memory (e.g., prefrontal cortex), or the storage of information retrieved as long-term explicit memories (e.g., hippocampus and related cortical areas) or the modulation of the storage of memories related to emotional events (e.g., amygdala). This does not mean that there is a separate neural structure completely supporting the storage of each kind of memory but means that these memories critically depend on the functioning of these neural structures. The current view is that there is no sense in talking about hippocampusbased or amygdala-based memory since this implies that there is a oneto- one correspondence. The present question to be solved is how systems interact in memory. The pertinence of attributing a critical role to cellular processes like synaptic tagging and protein kinase A activation to explain the memory storage processes at the cellular level was also discussed.application/pdfengBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas médicas e biológicas. Ribeirão Preto, SP. Vol. 33, no. 9 (Sept. 2000), p. 993-1002BioquímicaMemoryLearningHippocampusPrefrontal cortexAmygdalaMemory systemsThe brain decade in debate : I. Neurobiology of learning and memoryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000297752.pdf000297752.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf42615http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/21168/1/000297752.pdf55e82c2b465ab1b5aa28bb28ce5dfbe1MD51TEXT000297752.pdf.txt000297752.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain37058http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/21168/2/000297752.pdf.txtc8331c8049f55139a17b0fe525e92cbcMD52THUMBNAIL000297752.pdf.jpg000297752.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1646http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/21168/3/000297752.pdf.jpg9e3233620851e6a7700f55de0bb7540dMD5310183/211682021-11-20 05:44:16.814356oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/21168Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-11-20T07:44:16Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
The brain decade in debate : I. Neurobiology of learning and memory |
title |
The brain decade in debate : I. Neurobiology of learning and memory |
spellingShingle |
The brain decade in debate : I. Neurobiology of learning and memory Baddeley, Alan Bioquímica Memory Learning Hippocampus Prefrontal cortex Amygdala Memory systems |
title_short |
The brain decade in debate : I. Neurobiology of learning and memory |
title_full |
The brain decade in debate : I. Neurobiology of learning and memory |
title_fullStr |
The brain decade in debate : I. Neurobiology of learning and memory |
title_full_unstemmed |
The brain decade in debate : I. Neurobiology of learning and memory |
title_sort |
The brain decade in debate : I. Neurobiology of learning and memory |
author |
Baddeley, Alan |
author_facet |
Baddeley, Alan Bueno, Orlando Cahill, Larry Fuster, Joaquin M. Izquierdo, Ivan Antonio McGaugh, James L. Morris, Richard Nadel, Lynn Routtenberg, Aryeh Xavier, Gilberto Fernando Da Cunha, Claudio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bueno, Orlando Cahill, Larry Fuster, Joaquin M. Izquierdo, Ivan Antonio McGaugh, James L. Morris, Richard Nadel, Lynn Routtenberg, Aryeh Xavier, Gilberto Fernando Da Cunha, Claudio |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Baddeley, Alan Bueno, Orlando Cahill, Larry Fuster, Joaquin M. Izquierdo, Ivan Antonio McGaugh, James L. Morris, Richard Nadel, Lynn Routtenberg, Aryeh Xavier, Gilberto Fernando Da Cunha, Claudio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bioquímica |
topic |
Bioquímica Memory Learning Hippocampus Prefrontal cortex Amygdala Memory systems |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Memory Learning Hippocampus Prefrontal cortex Amygdala Memory systems |
description |
This article is a transcription of an electronic symposium in which some active researchers were invited by the Brazilian Society for Neuroscience and Behavior (SBNeC) to discuss the last decade’s advances in neurobiology of learning and memory. The way different parts of the brain are recruited during the storage of different kinds of memory (e.g., short-term vs long-term memory, declarative vs procedural memory) and even the property of these divisions were discussed. It was pointed out that the brain does not really store memories, but stores traces of information that are later used to create memories, not always expressing a completely veridical picture of the past experienced reality. To perform this process different parts of the brain act as important nodes of the neural network that encode, store and retrieve the information that will be used to create memories. Some of the brain regions are recognizably active during the activation of short-term working memory (e.g., prefrontal cortex), or the storage of information retrieved as long-term explicit memories (e.g., hippocampus and related cortical areas) or the modulation of the storage of memories related to emotional events (e.g., amygdala). This does not mean that there is a separate neural structure completely supporting the storage of each kind of memory but means that these memories critically depend on the functioning of these neural structures. The current view is that there is no sense in talking about hippocampusbased or amygdala-based memory since this implies that there is a oneto- one correspondence. The present question to be solved is how systems interact in memory. The pertinence of attributing a critical role to cellular processes like synaptic tagging and protein kinase A activation to explain the memory storage processes at the cellular level was also discussed. |
publishDate |
2000 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2000 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2010-04-24T04:15:33Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/21168 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
0100-879X |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
000297752 |
identifier_str_mv |
0100-879X 000297752 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/21168 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas médicas e biológicas. Ribeirão Preto, SP. Vol. 33, no. 9 (Sept. 2000), p. 993-1002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/21168/1/000297752.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/21168/2/000297752.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/21168/3/000297752.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
55e82c2b465ab1b5aa28bb28ce5dfbe1 c8331c8049f55139a17b0fe525e92cbc 9e3233620851e6a7700f55de0bb7540d |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1801224710540754944 |