Positive expiratory pressure in postoperative cardiac patients in intensive care: a randomized controlled trial
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/222816 |
Resumo: | Objective: To evaluate effectiveness of positive expiratory pressure blow-bottle device compared to expiratory positive airway pressure and conventional physiotherapy on pulmonary function in postoperative cardiac surgery patients in intensive care unit. Design: A randomized controlled trial. Settings: Tertiary care. Subjects: 48 patients (16 in each group; aged 64.5±9.1 years, 38 male) submitted to cardiac surgery. Interventions: Patients were randomized into conventional physiotherapy (G1), positive expiratory pressure blow-bottle device (G2) or expiratory positive airway pressure, both associated with conventional physiotherapy (G3). G2 and G3 performed three sets of 10 repetitions in each session for each technique. Main measures: Pulmonary function (primary); respiratory muscle strength, radiological changes, pulmonary complications, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay (secondary) assessed preoperatively and on the 3rd postoperative day. Results: Pulmonary function (except for forced expiratory volume in one second/ forced vital capacity % predicted) and respiratory muscle strength showed significant reduction from the preoperative to the 3rd postoperative in all groups (P<0.001), with no difference between groups (P>0.05). Regarding radiological changes, length of intensive care unit stay and length of hospital stay, there was no significant difference between groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Both positive expiratory pressure techniques associated with conventional physiotherapy were similar, but there was no difference regarding the use of positive expiratory pressure compared to conventional physiotherapy. |
id |
UFRGS-2_2e57129e1779e0275866695080bae281 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/222816 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pieczkoski, Suzimara MonteiroOliveira, Amanda Lino deSbruzzi, GracieleHaeffner, Mauren PortoAzambuja, Aline de Cássia Meine2021-06-25T04:24:13Z20210269-2155http://hdl.handle.net/10183/222816001127134Objective: To evaluate effectiveness of positive expiratory pressure blow-bottle device compared to expiratory positive airway pressure and conventional physiotherapy on pulmonary function in postoperative cardiac surgery patients in intensive care unit. Design: A randomized controlled trial. Settings: Tertiary care. Subjects: 48 patients (16 in each group; aged 64.5±9.1 years, 38 male) submitted to cardiac surgery. Interventions: Patients were randomized into conventional physiotherapy (G1), positive expiratory pressure blow-bottle device (G2) or expiratory positive airway pressure, both associated with conventional physiotherapy (G3). G2 and G3 performed three sets of 10 repetitions in each session for each technique. Main measures: Pulmonary function (primary); respiratory muscle strength, radiological changes, pulmonary complications, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay (secondary) assessed preoperatively and on the 3rd postoperative day. Results: Pulmonary function (except for forced expiratory volume in one second/ forced vital capacity % predicted) and respiratory muscle strength showed significant reduction from the preoperative to the 3rd postoperative in all groups (P<0.001), with no difference between groups (P>0.05). Regarding radiological changes, length of intensive care unit stay and length of hospital stay, there was no significant difference between groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Both positive expiratory pressure techniques associated with conventional physiotherapy were similar, but there was no difference regarding the use of positive expiratory pressure compared to conventional physiotherapy.application/pdfengClinical Rehabilitation. Londres. Vol. 35, n.5 (May 2021), p. 681–691Cirurgia cardíacaFunção pulmonarFisioterapiaEnsaio clínicoCardiac surgeryPhysiotherapyClinical trialPositive expiratory pressure in postoperative cardiac patients in intensive care: a randomized controlled trialEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001127134.pdf.txt001127134.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain35962http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/222816/2/001127134.pdf.txtaac847ecd9cf37dfbb86e354544f7c98MD52ORIGINAL001127134.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf192189http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/222816/1/001127134.pdf2845b92e92197429acc719f952f77f28MD5110183/2228162021-07-09 04:31:23.087004oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/222816Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestlume@ufrgs.bropendoar:2021-07-09T07:31:23Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Positive expiratory pressure in postoperative cardiac patients in intensive care: a randomized controlled trial |
title |
Positive expiratory pressure in postoperative cardiac patients in intensive care: a randomized controlled trial |
spellingShingle |
Positive expiratory pressure in postoperative cardiac patients in intensive care: a randomized controlled trial Pieczkoski, Suzimara Monteiro Cirurgia cardíaca Função pulmonar Fisioterapia Ensaio clínico Cardiac surgery Physiotherapy Clinical trial |
title_short |
Positive expiratory pressure in postoperative cardiac patients in intensive care: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full |
Positive expiratory pressure in postoperative cardiac patients in intensive care: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr |
Positive expiratory pressure in postoperative cardiac patients in intensive care: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Positive expiratory pressure in postoperative cardiac patients in intensive care: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort |
Positive expiratory pressure in postoperative cardiac patients in intensive care: a randomized controlled trial |
author |
Pieczkoski, Suzimara Monteiro |
author_facet |
Pieczkoski, Suzimara Monteiro Oliveira, Amanda Lino de Sbruzzi, Graciele Haeffner, Mauren Porto Azambuja, Aline de Cássia Meine |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Amanda Lino de Sbruzzi, Graciele Haeffner, Mauren Porto Azambuja, Aline de Cássia Meine |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pieczkoski, Suzimara Monteiro Oliveira, Amanda Lino de Sbruzzi, Graciele Haeffner, Mauren Porto Azambuja, Aline de Cássia Meine |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cirurgia cardíaca Função pulmonar Fisioterapia Ensaio clínico |
topic |
Cirurgia cardíaca Função pulmonar Fisioterapia Ensaio clínico Cardiac surgery Physiotherapy Clinical trial |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Cardiac surgery Physiotherapy Clinical trial |
description |
Objective: To evaluate effectiveness of positive expiratory pressure blow-bottle device compared to expiratory positive airway pressure and conventional physiotherapy on pulmonary function in postoperative cardiac surgery patients in intensive care unit. Design: A randomized controlled trial. Settings: Tertiary care. Subjects: 48 patients (16 in each group; aged 64.5±9.1 years, 38 male) submitted to cardiac surgery. Interventions: Patients were randomized into conventional physiotherapy (G1), positive expiratory pressure blow-bottle device (G2) or expiratory positive airway pressure, both associated with conventional physiotherapy (G3). G2 and G3 performed three sets of 10 repetitions in each session for each technique. Main measures: Pulmonary function (primary); respiratory muscle strength, radiological changes, pulmonary complications, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay (secondary) assessed preoperatively and on the 3rd postoperative day. Results: Pulmonary function (except for forced expiratory volume in one second/ forced vital capacity % predicted) and respiratory muscle strength showed significant reduction from the preoperative to the 3rd postoperative in all groups (P<0.001), with no difference between groups (P>0.05). Regarding radiological changes, length of intensive care unit stay and length of hospital stay, there was no significant difference between groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Both positive expiratory pressure techniques associated with conventional physiotherapy were similar, but there was no difference regarding the use of positive expiratory pressure compared to conventional physiotherapy. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-25T04:24:13Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2021 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/222816 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
0269-2155 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001127134 |
identifier_str_mv |
0269-2155 001127134 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/222816 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Clinical Rehabilitation. Londres. Vol. 35, n.5 (May 2021), p. 681–691 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/222816/2/001127134.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/222816/1/001127134.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
aac847ecd9cf37dfbb86e354544f7c98 2845b92e92197429acc719f952f77f28 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
lume@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1817725101454393344 |