Choking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trial
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/267232 |
Resumo: | Objective: Compare the occurrence of choking and gagging in infants subjected to three complementary feeding (CF) methods. Methods: Randomized clinical trial with mother-infant pairs, allocated according to the following methods of CF: a) Parent-Led Weaning (PLW) — group control, b) Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS (BLISS), and c) mixed (initially BLISS and if the infant presents a lack of interest or dissatisfaction, PLW), with the last two methods guided by the infant. Mothers received nutritional intervention on CF and prevention of choking and gagging according to the method at 5.5 months of age and remained in follow-up until 12 months. Frequencies of choking and gagging were collected by questionnaire at nine and 12 months. The comparison between groups was performed using the analysis of variance test (p < 0.05). Results 130 infants were followed, and 34 (26.2%) children presented choking between six and 12 months of age, 13 (30.2%) in PLW, 10 (22.2%) BLISS, and 11 (26.2%) mixed method, no significative difference between methods (p > 0.05). The choking was caused mainly by the semi-solid/solid consistency. Moreover, 100 (80%) infants aged from six to 12 months presented gagging and their characteristics were not statistically different among groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Infants following a baby-led feeding method that includes advice on minimizing choking risk do not seem more likely to choke than infants following traditional feeding practice that includes advice on minimizing choking risk. |
id |
UFRGS-2_356eefaf1e5819982c1f323e37caebab |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/267232 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Paiva, Christielly Santos Silveira deNunes, Leandro MeirellesBernardi, Juliana RombaldiMoreira, Paula RuffoniMariath, Adriela Azevedo SouzaGomes, Erissandra2023-11-18T03:25:21Z20230021-7557http://hdl.handle.net/10183/267232001186716Objective: Compare the occurrence of choking and gagging in infants subjected to three complementary feeding (CF) methods. Methods: Randomized clinical trial with mother-infant pairs, allocated according to the following methods of CF: a) Parent-Led Weaning (PLW) — group control, b) Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS (BLISS), and c) mixed (initially BLISS and if the infant presents a lack of interest or dissatisfaction, PLW), with the last two methods guided by the infant. Mothers received nutritional intervention on CF and prevention of choking and gagging according to the method at 5.5 months of age and remained in follow-up until 12 months. Frequencies of choking and gagging were collected by questionnaire at nine and 12 months. The comparison between groups was performed using the analysis of variance test (p < 0.05). Results 130 infants were followed, and 34 (26.2%) children presented choking between six and 12 months of age, 13 (30.2%) in PLW, 10 (22.2%) BLISS, and 11 (26.2%) mixed method, no significative difference between methods (p > 0.05). The choking was caused mainly by the semi-solid/solid consistency. Moreover, 100 (80%) infants aged from six to 12 months presented gagging and their characteristics were not statistically different among groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Infants following a baby-led feeding method that includes advice on minimizing choking risk do not seem more likely to choke than infants following traditional feeding practice that includes advice on minimizing choking risk.application/pdfengJornal de pediatria. Vol. 99, n. 6 (Nov./Dec. 2023), p. 574-581EngasgoFenômenos fisiológicos da nutrição do lactenteMétodos de alimentaçãoEnsaio clínico controlado aleatórioChokingInfant feedingFeeding methodsRandomized clinical trialChoking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trialinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001186716.pdf.txt001186716.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain33819http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/267232/2/001186716.pdf.txt494932d57eb31291f9d8ee9b744becb7MD52ORIGINAL001186716.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1208940http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/267232/1/001186716.pdf06c2ebc0d6944a438a44d620f62f2770MD5110183/2672322023-11-19 04:21:19.020085oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/267232Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-11-19T06:21:19Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Choking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trial |
title |
Choking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trial |
spellingShingle |
Choking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trial Paiva, Christielly Santos Silveira de Engasgo Fenômenos fisiológicos da nutrição do lactente Métodos de alimentação Ensaio clínico controlado aleatório Choking Infant feeding Feeding methods Randomized clinical trial |
title_short |
Choking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trial |
title_full |
Choking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trial |
title_fullStr |
Choking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Choking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trial |
title_sort |
Choking, gagging and complementary feeding methods in the first year of life : a randomized clinical trial |
author |
Paiva, Christielly Santos Silveira de |
author_facet |
Paiva, Christielly Santos Silveira de Nunes, Leandro Meirelles Bernardi, Juliana Rombaldi Moreira, Paula Ruffoni Mariath, Adriela Azevedo Souza Gomes, Erissandra |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nunes, Leandro Meirelles Bernardi, Juliana Rombaldi Moreira, Paula Ruffoni Mariath, Adriela Azevedo Souza Gomes, Erissandra |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paiva, Christielly Santos Silveira de Nunes, Leandro Meirelles Bernardi, Juliana Rombaldi Moreira, Paula Ruffoni Mariath, Adriela Azevedo Souza Gomes, Erissandra |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Engasgo Fenômenos fisiológicos da nutrição do lactente Métodos de alimentação Ensaio clínico controlado aleatório |
topic |
Engasgo Fenômenos fisiológicos da nutrição do lactente Métodos de alimentação Ensaio clínico controlado aleatório Choking Infant feeding Feeding methods Randomized clinical trial |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Choking Infant feeding Feeding methods Randomized clinical trial |
description |
Objective: Compare the occurrence of choking and gagging in infants subjected to three complementary feeding (CF) methods. Methods: Randomized clinical trial with mother-infant pairs, allocated according to the following methods of CF: a) Parent-Led Weaning (PLW) — group control, b) Baby-Led Introduction to SolidS (BLISS), and c) mixed (initially BLISS and if the infant presents a lack of interest or dissatisfaction, PLW), with the last two methods guided by the infant. Mothers received nutritional intervention on CF and prevention of choking and gagging according to the method at 5.5 months of age and remained in follow-up until 12 months. Frequencies of choking and gagging were collected by questionnaire at nine and 12 months. The comparison between groups was performed using the analysis of variance test (p < 0.05). Results 130 infants were followed, and 34 (26.2%) children presented choking between six and 12 months of age, 13 (30.2%) in PLW, 10 (22.2%) BLISS, and 11 (26.2%) mixed method, no significative difference between methods (p > 0.05). The choking was caused mainly by the semi-solid/solid consistency. Moreover, 100 (80%) infants aged from six to 12 months presented gagging and their characteristics were not statistically different among groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Infants following a baby-led feeding method that includes advice on minimizing choking risk do not seem more likely to choke than infants following traditional feeding practice that includes advice on minimizing choking risk. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2023-11-18T03:25:21Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2023 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/267232 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
0021-7557 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001186716 |
identifier_str_mv |
0021-7557 001186716 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/267232 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Jornal de pediatria. Vol. 99, n. 6 (Nov./Dec. 2023), p. 574-581 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/267232/2/001186716.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/267232/1/001186716.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
494932d57eb31291f9d8ee9b744becb7 06c2ebc0d6944a438a44d620f62f2770 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447845175558144 |