Slow freezing versus vitrifcation for the cryopreservation of zebrafsh (Danio rerio) ovarian tissue

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marques, Lis Santos
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Fossati, Ana Amélia Nunes, Rodrigues, Rômulo Batista, Rosa, Helen T. da, Izaguirry, Aryele Pinto, Ramalho, Juliana B., Moreira, Jose Claudio Fonseca, Santos, Francielli Weber, Zhang, Tiantian, Streit Júnior, Danilo Pedro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225559
Resumo: The aim of the present study was to compare the efficiency of vitrification and slow freezing techniques for the cryopreservation of zebrafish ovarian tissue containing immature follicles. In Experiment 1, assessment of cell membrane integrity by trypan blue exclusion staining was used to select the best cryoprotectant solution for each cryopreservation method. Primary growth (PG) oocytes showed the best percentage of membrane integrity (63.5 ± 2.99%) when SF4 solution (2 M methanol + 0.1 M trehalose + 10% egg yolk solution) was employed. The vitrification solution, which presented the highest membrane integrity (V2; 1.5 M methanol + 5.5 M Me2SO + 0.5 M sucrose + 10% egg yolk solution) was selected for Experiment 2. Experiment 2 aimed to compare the vitrification and slow freezing techniques in the following parameters: morphology, oxidative stress, mitochondrial activity, and DNA damage. Frozen ovarian tissue showed higher ROS levels and lower mitochondrial activity than vitrified ovarian tissue. Ultrastructural observations of frozen PG oocytes showed rupture of the plasma membrane, loss of intracellular contents and a large number of damaged mitochondria, while vitrified PG oocytes had intact mitochondria and cell plasma membranes. We conclude that vitrification may be more effective than slow freezing for the cryopreservation of zebrafish ovarian tissue.
id UFRGS-2_3f10c89bf3052f48cdc44bc2a6acecaf
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/225559
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Marques, Lis SantosFossati, Ana Amélia NunesRodrigues, Rômulo BatistaRosa, Helen T. daIzaguirry, Aryele PintoRamalho, Juliana B.Moreira, Jose Claudio FonsecaSantos, Francielli WeberZhang, TiantianStreit Júnior, Danilo Pedro2021-08-11T04:48:43Z20192045-2322http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225559001107565The aim of the present study was to compare the efficiency of vitrification and slow freezing techniques for the cryopreservation of zebrafish ovarian tissue containing immature follicles. In Experiment 1, assessment of cell membrane integrity by trypan blue exclusion staining was used to select the best cryoprotectant solution for each cryopreservation method. Primary growth (PG) oocytes showed the best percentage of membrane integrity (63.5 ± 2.99%) when SF4 solution (2 M methanol + 0.1 M trehalose + 10% egg yolk solution) was employed. The vitrification solution, which presented the highest membrane integrity (V2; 1.5 M methanol + 5.5 M Me2SO + 0.5 M sucrose + 10% egg yolk solution) was selected for Experiment 2. Experiment 2 aimed to compare the vitrification and slow freezing techniques in the following parameters: morphology, oxidative stress, mitochondrial activity, and DNA damage. Frozen ovarian tissue showed higher ROS levels and lower mitochondrial activity than vitrified ovarian tissue. Ultrastructural observations of frozen PG oocytes showed rupture of the plasma membrane, loss of intracellular contents and a large number of damaged mitochondria, while vitrified PG oocytes had intact mitochondria and cell plasma membranes. We conclude that vitrification may be more effective than slow freezing for the cryopreservation of zebrafish ovarian tissue.application/pdfengScientific reports. London. Vol. 9 (Oct. 2019), 15353, 11 p.CriopreservaçãoDanio rerioTecido animalSlow freezing versus vitrifcation for the cryopreservation of zebrafsh (Danio rerio) ovarian tissueEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001107565.pdf.txt001107565.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain45286http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225559/2/001107565.pdf.txt202b3a299d645d30231c831587d50910MD52ORIGINAL001107565.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf2584067http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225559/1/001107565.pdfbeed4fd0cabe194ae78a7c99bf8fc754MD5110183/2255592024-05-01 06:52:22.493825oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/225559Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestlume@ufrgs.bropendoar:2024-05-01T09:52:22Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Slow freezing versus vitrifcation for the cryopreservation of zebrafsh (Danio rerio) ovarian tissue
title Slow freezing versus vitrifcation for the cryopreservation of zebrafsh (Danio rerio) ovarian tissue
spellingShingle Slow freezing versus vitrifcation for the cryopreservation of zebrafsh (Danio rerio) ovarian tissue
Marques, Lis Santos
Criopreservação
Danio rerio
Tecido animal
title_short Slow freezing versus vitrifcation for the cryopreservation of zebrafsh (Danio rerio) ovarian tissue
title_full Slow freezing versus vitrifcation for the cryopreservation of zebrafsh (Danio rerio) ovarian tissue
title_fullStr Slow freezing versus vitrifcation for the cryopreservation of zebrafsh (Danio rerio) ovarian tissue
title_full_unstemmed Slow freezing versus vitrifcation for the cryopreservation of zebrafsh (Danio rerio) ovarian tissue
title_sort Slow freezing versus vitrifcation for the cryopreservation of zebrafsh (Danio rerio) ovarian tissue
author Marques, Lis Santos
author_facet Marques, Lis Santos
Fossati, Ana Amélia Nunes
Rodrigues, Rômulo Batista
Rosa, Helen T. da
Izaguirry, Aryele Pinto
Ramalho, Juliana B.
Moreira, Jose Claudio Fonseca
Santos, Francielli Weber
Zhang, Tiantian
Streit Júnior, Danilo Pedro
author_role author
author2 Fossati, Ana Amélia Nunes
Rodrigues, Rômulo Batista
Rosa, Helen T. da
Izaguirry, Aryele Pinto
Ramalho, Juliana B.
Moreira, Jose Claudio Fonseca
Santos, Francielli Weber
Zhang, Tiantian
Streit Júnior, Danilo Pedro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marques, Lis Santos
Fossati, Ana Amélia Nunes
Rodrigues, Rômulo Batista
Rosa, Helen T. da
Izaguirry, Aryele Pinto
Ramalho, Juliana B.
Moreira, Jose Claudio Fonseca
Santos, Francielli Weber
Zhang, Tiantian
Streit Júnior, Danilo Pedro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Criopreservação
Danio rerio
Tecido animal
topic Criopreservação
Danio rerio
Tecido animal
description The aim of the present study was to compare the efficiency of vitrification and slow freezing techniques for the cryopreservation of zebrafish ovarian tissue containing immature follicles. In Experiment 1, assessment of cell membrane integrity by trypan blue exclusion staining was used to select the best cryoprotectant solution for each cryopreservation method. Primary growth (PG) oocytes showed the best percentage of membrane integrity (63.5 ± 2.99%) when SF4 solution (2 M methanol + 0.1 M trehalose + 10% egg yolk solution) was employed. The vitrification solution, which presented the highest membrane integrity (V2; 1.5 M methanol + 5.5 M Me2SO + 0.5 M sucrose + 10% egg yolk solution) was selected for Experiment 2. Experiment 2 aimed to compare the vitrification and slow freezing techniques in the following parameters: morphology, oxidative stress, mitochondrial activity, and DNA damage. Frozen ovarian tissue showed higher ROS levels and lower mitochondrial activity than vitrified ovarian tissue. Ultrastructural observations of frozen PG oocytes showed rupture of the plasma membrane, loss of intracellular contents and a large number of damaged mitochondria, while vitrified PG oocytes had intact mitochondria and cell plasma membranes. We conclude that vitrification may be more effective than slow freezing for the cryopreservation of zebrafish ovarian tissue.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-08-11T04:48:43Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225559
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 2045-2322
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001107565
identifier_str_mv 2045-2322
001107565
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225559
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Scientific reports. London. Vol. 9 (Oct. 2019), 15353, 11 p.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225559/2/001107565.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225559/1/001107565.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 202b3a299d645d30231c831587d50910
beed4fd0cabe194ae78a7c99bf8fc754
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv lume@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1817725110832857088