Silagem de alfafa colhida no início do florescimento e submetida ao emurchecimento e à ação de aditivos biológicos
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2000 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/129389 |
Resumo: | A 40 days alfalfa (Medicago sativa) regrowth was harvested in the summer at the early flowering stage with (26.3% DM, 18.94% CP, 8,90% DM soluble carbohydrates and 43.35 meq OH-/100 g DM buffering capacity). Part of the material was direct cut ensiled (26.3% DM) and part was wilted for 20 hours (44.12% DM). Both silages, either wilted or not, were assigned to four treatments: Control, Enzymes, Inoculate and Inoculate plus Enzymes and were ensiled in laboratory silos (3.6 L), with four replicates, per treatment, per a period 60 days. Wilting provived silages of better quality with lower pH, higher lactic acid/acetic acid ratio, lower N-NH3 and lower solubilization of the nitrogen fraction, with higher residual soluble carbohydrates content. The direct cut alfalfa silages additive action provided lower pH and N-NH3 in the treatments with Enzymes and Inoculate plus enzymes when compared to the treatment with Inoculate, however when compared to the treatment with Inoculate, but did not differ from Control. In both silages (direct cut and wilted), there was a decrease in the NDF contents in the Inoculates plus Enzymes treatment. |
id |
UFRGS-2_414ffac92fb624d02d6a69b860cb6fb0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/129389 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Rangrab, Luis HenriqueMuhlbach, Paulo Roberto FrenzelBerto, Jorge Luiz2015-11-09T16:37:42Z20001516-3598http://hdl.handle.net/10183/129389000274150A 40 days alfalfa (Medicago sativa) regrowth was harvested in the summer at the early flowering stage with (26.3% DM, 18.94% CP, 8,90% DM soluble carbohydrates and 43.35 meq OH-/100 g DM buffering capacity). Part of the material was direct cut ensiled (26.3% DM) and part was wilted for 20 hours (44.12% DM). Both silages, either wilted or not, were assigned to four treatments: Control, Enzymes, Inoculate and Inoculate plus Enzymes and were ensiled in laboratory silos (3.6 L), with four replicates, per treatment, per a period 60 days. Wilting provived silages of better quality with lower pH, higher lactic acid/acetic acid ratio, lower N-NH3 and lower solubilization of the nitrogen fraction, with higher residual soluble carbohydrates content. The direct cut alfalfa silages additive action provided lower pH and N-NH3 in the treatments with Enzymes and Inoculate plus enzymes when compared to the treatment with Inoculate, however when compared to the treatment with Inoculate, but did not differ from Control. In both silages (direct cut and wilted), there was a decrease in the NDF contents in the Inoculates plus Enzymes treatment.application/pdfporRevista brasileira de zootecnia= Brazilian journal of animal science, Viçosa. Vol. 29, n. 2 (mar./abr. 2000), p. 349-356AlfafaSilagemNutricao animalNutrienteAlfalfa silageEnzymesInoculateWiltingSilagem de alfafa colhida no início do florescimento e submetida ao emurchecimento e à ação de aditivos biológicosAlfalfa silage harvest at the early flowering stage and submitted to wilt and action of biological additives info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000274150.pdf000274150.pdfTexto completoapplication/pdf41992http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/129389/1/000274150.pdf8f4848d6650d507c694b397bff609fcdMD51TEXT000274150.pdf.txt000274150.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain35201http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/129389/2/000274150.pdf.txte2d42d7eeea0564bd40bf03352861657MD52THUMBNAIL000274150.pdf.jpg000274150.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1895http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/129389/3/000274150.pdf.jpgb5c8cc1721805379ce280a42dfcda6a8MD5310183/1293892018-10-24 09:13:44.212oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/129389Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2018-10-24T12:13:44Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Silagem de alfafa colhida no início do florescimento e submetida ao emurchecimento e à ação de aditivos biológicos |
dc.title.alternative.en.fl_str_mv |
Alfalfa silage harvest at the early flowering stage and submitted to wilt and action of biological additives |
title |
Silagem de alfafa colhida no início do florescimento e submetida ao emurchecimento e à ação de aditivos biológicos |
spellingShingle |
Silagem de alfafa colhida no início do florescimento e submetida ao emurchecimento e à ação de aditivos biológicos Rangrab, Luis Henrique Alfafa Silagem Nutricao animal Nutriente Alfalfa silage Enzymes Inoculate Wilting |
title_short |
Silagem de alfafa colhida no início do florescimento e submetida ao emurchecimento e à ação de aditivos biológicos |
title_full |
Silagem de alfafa colhida no início do florescimento e submetida ao emurchecimento e à ação de aditivos biológicos |
title_fullStr |
Silagem de alfafa colhida no início do florescimento e submetida ao emurchecimento e à ação de aditivos biológicos |
title_full_unstemmed |
Silagem de alfafa colhida no início do florescimento e submetida ao emurchecimento e à ação de aditivos biológicos |
title_sort |
Silagem de alfafa colhida no início do florescimento e submetida ao emurchecimento e à ação de aditivos biológicos |
author |
Rangrab, Luis Henrique |
author_facet |
Rangrab, Luis Henrique Muhlbach, Paulo Roberto Frenzel Berto, Jorge Luiz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Muhlbach, Paulo Roberto Frenzel Berto, Jorge Luiz |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rangrab, Luis Henrique Muhlbach, Paulo Roberto Frenzel Berto, Jorge Luiz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Alfafa Silagem Nutricao animal Nutriente |
topic |
Alfafa Silagem Nutricao animal Nutriente Alfalfa silage Enzymes Inoculate Wilting |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Alfalfa silage Enzymes Inoculate Wilting |
description |
A 40 days alfalfa (Medicago sativa) regrowth was harvested in the summer at the early flowering stage with (26.3% DM, 18.94% CP, 8,90% DM soluble carbohydrates and 43.35 meq OH-/100 g DM buffering capacity). Part of the material was direct cut ensiled (26.3% DM) and part was wilted for 20 hours (44.12% DM). Both silages, either wilted or not, were assigned to four treatments: Control, Enzymes, Inoculate and Inoculate plus Enzymes and were ensiled in laboratory silos (3.6 L), with four replicates, per treatment, per a period 60 days. Wilting provived silages of better quality with lower pH, higher lactic acid/acetic acid ratio, lower N-NH3 and lower solubilization of the nitrogen fraction, with higher residual soluble carbohydrates content. The direct cut alfalfa silages additive action provided lower pH and N-NH3 in the treatments with Enzymes and Inoculate plus enzymes when compared to the treatment with Inoculate, however when compared to the treatment with Inoculate, but did not differ from Control. In both silages (direct cut and wilted), there was a decrease in the NDF contents in the Inoculates plus Enzymes treatment. |
publishDate |
2000 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2000 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2015-11-09T16:37:42Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/129389 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1516-3598 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
000274150 |
identifier_str_mv |
1516-3598 000274150 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/129389 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Revista brasileira de zootecnia= Brazilian journal of animal science, Viçosa. Vol. 29, n. 2 (mar./abr. 2000), p. 349-356 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/129389/1/000274150.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/129389/2/000274150.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/129389/3/000274150.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
8f4848d6650d507c694b397bff609fcd e2d42d7eeea0564bd40bf03352861657 b5c8cc1721805379ce280a42dfcda6a8 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1801224890170212352 |