Influence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sarti, Caroline Simão
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Renata Schlesner de, Campos, Priscila Hernández de, Novaes, Tatiane Fernandes, Diniz, Michele Baffi, Rodrigues, Jonas de Almeida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225429
Resumo: The aims of this study were to evaluate the influence (1) of the examiner experience and (2) three histological classification criteria on the reproducibility of two gold standard techniques (non-dye or dye) for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries. This study comprised a sample of 210 digital images of 105 permanent teeth (105 rhodamine B dyed and 105 dyefree hemisections) and six examiners. Images were evaluated on a laptop computer and categorised according to three different histological classification criteria (proposed by Ekstrand, Lussi or Downer) and repeated in order to allow reproducibility calculation. For data analysis, the six participants were divided into two groups: G1: examiners with previous experience in histological evaluation and G2: examiners with no experience in histological evaluation. Statistical significance was set at 0.05. Results. The mean intraexaminer reproducibility values in G1 were higher than G2 in all variables. Intra-examiner reproducibility was lower for the dye-free technique in both groups. The mean values of inter-examiner reproducibility in G1 ranged from 0.60 to 0.68, and in G2 values ranged from 0.34 to 0.69. Conclusion. It can be concluded that: (1) the examiners’ experience seems to influence the reproducibility of the two gold standard techniques studied and reproducibility tends to be lower when the dye-free technique is used, and (2) the histological classification criterion does not appear to influence the reproducibility for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries.
id UFRGS-2_41a12687f4a05132134a88b35e14ac14
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/225429
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Sarti, Caroline SimãoOliveira, Renata Schlesner deCampos, Priscila Hernández deNovaes, Tatiane FernandesDiniz, Michele BaffiRodrigues, Jonas de Almeida2021-08-10T04:31:51Z20191699-5848http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225429001099177The aims of this study were to evaluate the influence (1) of the examiner experience and (2) three histological classification criteria on the reproducibility of two gold standard techniques (non-dye or dye) for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries. This study comprised a sample of 210 digital images of 105 permanent teeth (105 rhodamine B dyed and 105 dyefree hemisections) and six examiners. Images were evaluated on a laptop computer and categorised according to three different histological classification criteria (proposed by Ekstrand, Lussi or Downer) and repeated in order to allow reproducibility calculation. For data analysis, the six participants were divided into two groups: G1: examiners with previous experience in histological evaluation and G2: examiners with no experience in histological evaluation. Statistical significance was set at 0.05. Results. The mean intraexaminer reproducibility values in G1 were higher than G2 in all variables. Intra-examiner reproducibility was lower for the dye-free technique in both groups. The mean values of inter-examiner reproducibility in G1 ranged from 0.60 to 0.68, and in G2 values ranged from 0.34 to 0.69. Conclusion. It can be concluded that: (1) the examiners’ experience seems to influence the reproducibility of the two gold standard techniques studied and reproducibility tends to be lower when the dye-free technique is used, and (2) the histological classification criterion does not appear to influence the reproducibility for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries.application/pdfengHistology and histopathology. Murcia, Spain. Vol. 34, no. 4 (Apr. 2019), p. 353-358Cárie dentáriaDiagnósticoDental cariesDiagnosisCaries detectionReproductibility of testsInfluence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesionsEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001099177.pdf.txt001099177.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain28688http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225429/2/001099177.pdf.txt45c0b2e05e63f27efbb4046b195ad6c3MD52ORIGINAL001099177.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf106385http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225429/1/001099177.pdf29cf466de3b0a4659467dadd0f2cd45bMD5110183/2254292021-08-18 04:41:00.540063oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/225429Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-08-18T07:41Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Influence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions
title Influence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions
spellingShingle Influence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions
Sarti, Caroline Simão
Cárie dentária
Diagnóstico
Dental caries
Diagnosis
Caries detection
Reproductibility of tests
title_short Influence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions
title_full Influence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions
title_fullStr Influence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions
title_full_unstemmed Influence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions
title_sort Influence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions
author Sarti, Caroline Simão
author_facet Sarti, Caroline Simão
Oliveira, Renata Schlesner de
Campos, Priscila Hernández de
Novaes, Tatiane Fernandes
Diniz, Michele Baffi
Rodrigues, Jonas de Almeida
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Renata Schlesner de
Campos, Priscila Hernández de
Novaes, Tatiane Fernandes
Diniz, Michele Baffi
Rodrigues, Jonas de Almeida
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sarti, Caroline Simão
Oliveira, Renata Schlesner de
Campos, Priscila Hernández de
Novaes, Tatiane Fernandes
Diniz, Michele Baffi
Rodrigues, Jonas de Almeida
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cárie dentária
Diagnóstico
topic Cárie dentária
Diagnóstico
Dental caries
Diagnosis
Caries detection
Reproductibility of tests
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Dental caries
Diagnosis
Caries detection
Reproductibility of tests
description The aims of this study were to evaluate the influence (1) of the examiner experience and (2) three histological classification criteria on the reproducibility of two gold standard techniques (non-dye or dye) for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries. This study comprised a sample of 210 digital images of 105 permanent teeth (105 rhodamine B dyed and 105 dyefree hemisections) and six examiners. Images were evaluated on a laptop computer and categorised according to three different histological classification criteria (proposed by Ekstrand, Lussi or Downer) and repeated in order to allow reproducibility calculation. For data analysis, the six participants were divided into two groups: G1: examiners with previous experience in histological evaluation and G2: examiners with no experience in histological evaluation. Statistical significance was set at 0.05. Results. The mean intraexaminer reproducibility values in G1 were higher than G2 in all variables. Intra-examiner reproducibility was lower for the dye-free technique in both groups. The mean values of inter-examiner reproducibility in G1 ranged from 0.60 to 0.68, and in G2 values ranged from 0.34 to 0.69. Conclusion. It can be concluded that: (1) the examiners’ experience seems to influence the reproducibility of the two gold standard techniques studied and reproducibility tends to be lower when the dye-free technique is used, and (2) the histological classification criterion does not appear to influence the reproducibility for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-08-10T04:31:51Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225429
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1699-5848
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001099177
identifier_str_mv 1699-5848
001099177
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225429
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Histology and histopathology. Murcia, Spain. Vol. 34, no. 4 (Apr. 2019), p. 353-358
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225429/2/001099177.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225429/1/001099177.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 45c0b2e05e63f27efbb4046b195ad6c3
29cf466de3b0a4659467dadd0f2cd45b
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801225031631503360