Influence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225429 |
Resumo: | The aims of this study were to evaluate the influence (1) of the examiner experience and (2) three histological classification criteria on the reproducibility of two gold standard techniques (non-dye or dye) for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries. This study comprised a sample of 210 digital images of 105 permanent teeth (105 rhodamine B dyed and 105 dyefree hemisections) and six examiners. Images were evaluated on a laptop computer and categorised according to three different histological classification criteria (proposed by Ekstrand, Lussi or Downer) and repeated in order to allow reproducibility calculation. For data analysis, the six participants were divided into two groups: G1: examiners with previous experience in histological evaluation and G2: examiners with no experience in histological evaluation. Statistical significance was set at 0.05. Results. The mean intraexaminer reproducibility values in G1 were higher than G2 in all variables. Intra-examiner reproducibility was lower for the dye-free technique in both groups. The mean values of inter-examiner reproducibility in G1 ranged from 0.60 to 0.68, and in G2 values ranged from 0.34 to 0.69. Conclusion. It can be concluded that: (1) the examiners’ experience seems to influence the reproducibility of the two gold standard techniques studied and reproducibility tends to be lower when the dye-free technique is used, and (2) the histological classification criterion does not appear to influence the reproducibility for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries. |
id |
UFRGS-2_41a12687f4a05132134a88b35e14ac14 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/225429 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Sarti, Caroline SimãoOliveira, Renata Schlesner deCampos, Priscila Hernández deNovaes, Tatiane FernandesDiniz, Michele BaffiRodrigues, Jonas de Almeida2021-08-10T04:31:51Z20191699-5848http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225429001099177The aims of this study were to evaluate the influence (1) of the examiner experience and (2) three histological classification criteria on the reproducibility of two gold standard techniques (non-dye or dye) for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries. This study comprised a sample of 210 digital images of 105 permanent teeth (105 rhodamine B dyed and 105 dyefree hemisections) and six examiners. Images were evaluated on a laptop computer and categorised according to three different histological classification criteria (proposed by Ekstrand, Lussi or Downer) and repeated in order to allow reproducibility calculation. For data analysis, the six participants were divided into two groups: G1: examiners with previous experience in histological evaluation and G2: examiners with no experience in histological evaluation. Statistical significance was set at 0.05. Results. The mean intraexaminer reproducibility values in G1 were higher than G2 in all variables. Intra-examiner reproducibility was lower for the dye-free technique in both groups. The mean values of inter-examiner reproducibility in G1 ranged from 0.60 to 0.68, and in G2 values ranged from 0.34 to 0.69. Conclusion. It can be concluded that: (1) the examiners’ experience seems to influence the reproducibility of the two gold standard techniques studied and reproducibility tends to be lower when the dye-free technique is used, and (2) the histological classification criterion does not appear to influence the reproducibility for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries.application/pdfengHistology and histopathology. Murcia, Spain. Vol. 34, no. 4 (Apr. 2019), p. 353-358Cárie dentáriaDiagnósticoDental cariesDiagnosisCaries detectionReproductibility of testsInfluence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesionsEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001099177.pdf.txt001099177.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain28688http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225429/2/001099177.pdf.txt45c0b2e05e63f27efbb4046b195ad6c3MD52ORIGINAL001099177.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf106385http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225429/1/001099177.pdf29cf466de3b0a4659467dadd0f2cd45bMD5110183/2254292021-08-18 04:41:00.540063oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/225429Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-08-18T07:41Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Influence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions |
title |
Influence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions |
spellingShingle |
Influence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions Sarti, Caroline Simão Cárie dentária Diagnóstico Dental caries Diagnosis Caries detection Reproductibility of tests |
title_short |
Influence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions |
title_full |
Influence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions |
title_fullStr |
Influence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions |
title_sort |
Influence of examiners’ experience on the reproducibility of different gold standard techniques and histological criteria for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries lesions |
author |
Sarti, Caroline Simão |
author_facet |
Sarti, Caroline Simão Oliveira, Renata Schlesner de Campos, Priscila Hernández de Novaes, Tatiane Fernandes Diniz, Michele Baffi Rodrigues, Jonas de Almeida |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Renata Schlesner de Campos, Priscila Hernández de Novaes, Tatiane Fernandes Diniz, Michele Baffi Rodrigues, Jonas de Almeida |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sarti, Caroline Simão Oliveira, Renata Schlesner de Campos, Priscila Hernández de Novaes, Tatiane Fernandes Diniz, Michele Baffi Rodrigues, Jonas de Almeida |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cárie dentária Diagnóstico |
topic |
Cárie dentária Diagnóstico Dental caries Diagnosis Caries detection Reproductibility of tests |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Dental caries Diagnosis Caries detection Reproductibility of tests |
description |
The aims of this study were to evaluate the influence (1) of the examiner experience and (2) three histological classification criteria on the reproducibility of two gold standard techniques (non-dye or dye) for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries. This study comprised a sample of 210 digital images of 105 permanent teeth (105 rhodamine B dyed and 105 dyefree hemisections) and six examiners. Images were evaluated on a laptop computer and categorised according to three different histological classification criteria (proposed by Ekstrand, Lussi or Downer) and repeated in order to allow reproducibility calculation. For data analysis, the six participants were divided into two groups: G1: examiners with previous experience in histological evaluation and G2: examiners with no experience in histological evaluation. Statistical significance was set at 0.05. Results. The mean intraexaminer reproducibility values in G1 were higher than G2 in all variables. Intra-examiner reproducibility was lower for the dye-free technique in both groups. The mean values of inter-examiner reproducibility in G1 ranged from 0.60 to 0.68, and in G2 values ranged from 0.34 to 0.69. Conclusion. It can be concluded that: (1) the examiners’ experience seems to influence the reproducibility of the two gold standard techniques studied and reproducibility tends to be lower when the dye-free technique is used, and (2) the histological classification criterion does not appear to influence the reproducibility for validation of the diagnosis of occlusal caries. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2019 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2021-08-10T04:31:51Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225429 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1699-5848 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001099177 |
identifier_str_mv |
1699-5848 001099177 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/225429 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Histology and histopathology. Murcia, Spain. Vol. 34, no. 4 (Apr. 2019), p. 353-358 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225429/2/001099177.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/225429/1/001099177.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
45c0b2e05e63f27efbb4046b195ad6c3 29cf466de3b0a4659467dadd0f2cd45b |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447761695277056 |