Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Wollheim, Claudia
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Sperhacke, Rosa Dea, Fontana, Sabrina Khaler Ribeiro, Vanni, Andréa Cristina, Kato, Sergio Kakuta, Araújo, Patrícia Regina de, Barth, Afonso Luis, Madi, José Mauro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/201273
Resumo: INTRODUCTION: Group B Streptococcus (GBS), a source of neonatal infection, colonizes the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts of pregnant women. Routine screening for maternal GBS in late pregnancy and consequent intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis have reduced the incidence of early-onset GBS neonatal infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of PCR, compared to culture (gold standard), in GBS colonization screening of pregnant women, and to establish the prevalence of GBS colonization among this population. METHODS: Vaginal introitus and perianal samples were collected from 204 pregnant women, between the 35th and 37th weeks of pregnancy, at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit of the University of Caxias do Sul General Hospital between June 2008 and September 2009. All samples were cultured after enrichment in a selective medium and then assayed by culture and PCR methods. RESULTS: The culture and PCR methods yielded detection rates of vaginal/perianal GBS colonization of 22.5% and 26%, respectively (sensitivity 100%; specificity 95.6%; positive and negative predictive values 86.8% and 100%, respectively). A higher prevalence of GBS colonization was detected in the combined vaginal and perianal samples by both culture and PCR assay analyses. CONCLUSIONS: PCR is a faster and more efficient method for GBS screening, allowing for optimal identification of women who should receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent newborn infection.
id UFRGS-2_4f53d9e54376ebc76cd54169d8f34b4c
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/201273
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Wollheim, ClaudiaSperhacke, Rosa DeaFontana, Sabrina Khaler RibeiroVanni, Andréa CristinaKato, Sergio KakutaAraújo, Patrícia Regina deBarth, Afonso LuisMadi, José Mauro2019-11-02T03:51:51Z20170037-8682http://hdl.handle.net/10183/201273001104004INTRODUCTION: Group B Streptococcus (GBS), a source of neonatal infection, colonizes the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts of pregnant women. Routine screening for maternal GBS in late pregnancy and consequent intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis have reduced the incidence of early-onset GBS neonatal infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of PCR, compared to culture (gold standard), in GBS colonization screening of pregnant women, and to establish the prevalence of GBS colonization among this population. METHODS: Vaginal introitus and perianal samples were collected from 204 pregnant women, between the 35th and 37th weeks of pregnancy, at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit of the University of Caxias do Sul General Hospital between June 2008 and September 2009. All samples were cultured after enrichment in a selective medium and then assayed by culture and PCR methods. RESULTS: The culture and PCR methods yielded detection rates of vaginal/perianal GBS colonization of 22.5% and 26%, respectively (sensitivity 100%; specificity 95.6%; positive and negative predictive values 86.8% and 100%, respectively). A higher prevalence of GBS colonization was detected in the combined vaginal and perianal samples by both culture and PCR assay analyses. CONCLUSIONS: PCR is a faster and more efficient method for GBS screening, allowing for optimal identification of women who should receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent newborn infection.application/pdfengRevista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical. Vol. 50, n. 2 (mar./abr. 2017), p. 179-183StreptococcusGestantesGroup B StreptococcusPregnant womenCulturePCRGroup B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methodsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001104004.pdf.txt001104004.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain22801http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/201273/2/001104004.pdf.txtc91261404c565444beffeb550bae6d7dMD52ORIGINAL001104004.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf855186http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/201273/1/001104004.pdfe76cfd19ea369ae8e9b6495924d48d87MD5110183/2012732019-11-03 03:52:02.697326oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/201273Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2019-11-03T05:52:02Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methods
title Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methods
spellingShingle Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methods
Wollheim, Claudia
Streptococcus
Gestantes
Group B Streptococcus
Pregnant women
Culture
PCR
title_short Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methods
title_full Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methods
title_fullStr Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methods
title_full_unstemmed Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methods
title_sort Group B Streptococcus detection in pregnant women via culture and PCR methods
author Wollheim, Claudia
author_facet Wollheim, Claudia
Sperhacke, Rosa Dea
Fontana, Sabrina Khaler Ribeiro
Vanni, Andréa Cristina
Kato, Sergio Kakuta
Araújo, Patrícia Regina de
Barth, Afonso Luis
Madi, José Mauro
author_role author
author2 Sperhacke, Rosa Dea
Fontana, Sabrina Khaler Ribeiro
Vanni, Andréa Cristina
Kato, Sergio Kakuta
Araújo, Patrícia Regina de
Barth, Afonso Luis
Madi, José Mauro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Wollheim, Claudia
Sperhacke, Rosa Dea
Fontana, Sabrina Khaler Ribeiro
Vanni, Andréa Cristina
Kato, Sergio Kakuta
Araújo, Patrícia Regina de
Barth, Afonso Luis
Madi, José Mauro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Streptococcus
Gestantes
topic Streptococcus
Gestantes
Group B Streptococcus
Pregnant women
Culture
PCR
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Group B Streptococcus
Pregnant women
Culture
PCR
description INTRODUCTION: Group B Streptococcus (GBS), a source of neonatal infection, colonizes the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts of pregnant women. Routine screening for maternal GBS in late pregnancy and consequent intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis have reduced the incidence of early-onset GBS neonatal infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of PCR, compared to culture (gold standard), in GBS colonization screening of pregnant women, and to establish the prevalence of GBS colonization among this population. METHODS: Vaginal introitus and perianal samples were collected from 204 pregnant women, between the 35th and 37th weeks of pregnancy, at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit of the University of Caxias do Sul General Hospital between June 2008 and September 2009. All samples were cultured after enrichment in a selective medium and then assayed by culture and PCR methods. RESULTS: The culture and PCR methods yielded detection rates of vaginal/perianal GBS colonization of 22.5% and 26%, respectively (sensitivity 100%; specificity 95.6%; positive and negative predictive values 86.8% and 100%, respectively). A higher prevalence of GBS colonization was detected in the combined vaginal and perianal samples by both culture and PCR assay analyses. CONCLUSIONS: PCR is a faster and more efficient method for GBS screening, allowing for optimal identification of women who should receive intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent newborn infection.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-11-02T03:51:51Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/201273
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 0037-8682
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001104004
identifier_str_mv 0037-8682
001104004
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/201273
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical. Vol. 50, n. 2 (mar./abr. 2017), p. 179-183
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/201273/2/001104004.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/201273/1/001104004.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv c91261404c565444beffeb550bae6d7d
e76cfd19ea369ae8e9b6495924d48d87
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224978112184320