The use of rubber dam in the survival of RMGIC restorations in primary molars : a 30-month randomized controlled clinical trial

• Autor(a) principal: Brum, Vanessa dos Santos
• Data de Publicação: 2024
• Outros Autores: Borges, Maria Luiza Vieira, Santos, Nicole Marchioro dos, Kaufmann, Camila, Rodrigues, Jonas de Almeida
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/272298
• topic: Cárie dentária; Diques de borracha; Taxa de sobrevida; Cimentos de ionômeros de vidro; Dente decíduo; Dental cavities; Rubber dams; Survival rate; Glass ionomer cements; Tooth Deciduous

Abstract: This study was a randomized controlled clinical trial with two parallel arms and the objective was to compare the survival of resin modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) restorations in primary teeth using rubber dam or cotton roll isolation after a 30-month follow-up period. Ninety-two children (mean age 6.8 ± 1.37) and 200 primary molars with occlusal or occluso-proximal cavitated dentin caries lesions were randomly assigned into two groups: cotton rolls and rubber dam. All lesions were restored using RMGIC (RIVA Light Cure) after selective caries removal. Restorative failure and lesion arrestment were evaluated by two independent, trained, and calibrated examiners through clinical and radiographic examinations. The Kaplan-Meier test was used to assess the survival of restorations and Cox regression was used to assess the association of risk factors with restorative failure. There was no significant difference in survival rates between groups (p = 0.17). Older age (HR = 2.81 [95%CI: 1.47–5.44]) and higher rate of gingival bleeding (HR = 0.47 [95%CI: 0.23–0.99]) were associated with restorative failure. No patient had painful symptoms, pulp outcomes, or radiographic changes compatible with lesion progression. The use of rubber dam isolation did not increase the survival rate of occlusal and occluso-proximal restorations using RMGIC in primary molars after 30 months of follow-up. Since the survival is not influenced by the type of isolation, the professional can safely choose the appropriate technique for each case, considering his experience and preferences, as well as those of the patient.