Premises for eco-efficiency analysis on construction and demolition waste recycling
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/253027 |
Resumo: | The construction industry is associated with significative impacts such a consumption of natural resources and waste generation. Eco-efficiency is an instrument for sustainable analysis which indicates the relation between environmental costs and impacts. While the most environmental method used is the lifecycle assessment (LCA), standardized by ISO 14040, the economic indicator should be selected according to the stakeholder. Total cost, Unit Cost, Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) are some of the economic indicators used in the economic analysis of Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) recycling, however, the search for literature regarding the Eco-efficiency analysis shows a tendency to use the total cost regardless of its objective. In this sense, the objective of this paper is to propose the main premises to be considered in the selection of the economic indicator and in the normalization of the analysis of the CDW recycling Eco-efficiency index results. The search method adopted was comprised for three steps: Systematic review of literature; Analysis and comparison of Eco-efficiency indicators (including economic and environmental inputs); Discussion about the main assumptions in the CDW recycling Eco-efficiency analysis. 14 articles were identified in the Science Direct and Springer platforms. This paper provides information to propose premises to the Eco-efficiency analysis on CDW recycling. As a result, was defined a standard Eco-efficiency analysis according the objective: assessment of the cost to minimizing impacts, a simple comparison between scenarios or economic and environmental viability. The first two objectives refer to the input data variation and the scenarios evaluated, respectively. The third objective needs to compare the results with the current scenario, the final disposal and established market material that recycled aggregate can replace. Using the simplified flowchart proposed for each CDW recycling Eco-efficiency analysis objective will allow to standardize studies of this aspect, thus enabling more credible, replicable and comparable development. |
id |
UFRGS-2_5bb250d84aa0a1efafcfc802f9e8bc31 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/253027 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Waskow, Régis PereiraKanno, RodrigoTubino, Rejane Maria Candiota2022-12-21T04:53:06Z20220718-378Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/253027001154358The construction industry is associated with significative impacts such a consumption of natural resources and waste generation. Eco-efficiency is an instrument for sustainable analysis which indicates the relation between environmental costs and impacts. While the most environmental method used is the lifecycle assessment (LCA), standardized by ISO 14040, the economic indicator should be selected according to the stakeholder. Total cost, Unit Cost, Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) are some of the economic indicators used in the economic analysis of Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) recycling, however, the search for literature regarding the Eco-efficiency analysis shows a tendency to use the total cost regardless of its objective. In this sense, the objective of this paper is to propose the main premises to be considered in the selection of the economic indicator and in the normalization of the analysis of the CDW recycling Eco-efficiency index results. The search method adopted was comprised for three steps: Systematic review of literature; Analysis and comparison of Eco-efficiency indicators (including economic and environmental inputs); Discussion about the main assumptions in the CDW recycling Eco-efficiency analysis. 14 articles were identified in the Science Direct and Springer platforms. This paper provides information to propose premises to the Eco-efficiency analysis on CDW recycling. As a result, was defined a standard Eco-efficiency analysis according the objective: assessment of the cost to minimizing impacts, a simple comparison between scenarios or economic and environmental viability. The first two objectives refer to the input data variation and the scenarios evaluated, respectively. The third objective needs to compare the results with the current scenario, the final disposal and established market material that recycled aggregate can replace. Using the simplified flowchart proposed for each CDW recycling Eco-efficiency analysis objective will allow to standardize studies of this aspect, thus enabling more credible, replicable and comparable development.application/pdfengRevista AIDIS de ingeniería y ciencias ambientales [recurso eletrônico]. Coyoacán, México. Vol. 14, n. 2 (ago. 2021), p. 564-577Reaproveitamento de resíduosResíduos da construção civilEcoeficiênciaEco-efficiencyConstruction wasteDemolition wasteLCALCCSustainabilityPremises for eco-efficiency analysis on construction and demolition waste recyclingEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001154358.pdf.txt001154358.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain36493http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/253027/2/001154358.pdf.txt82d11192b927d639dfb04411770f1dc8MD52ORIGINAL001154358.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf436072http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/253027/1/001154358.pdffdd4573edfc94a6f6654f36915fabbceMD5110183/2530272024-09-04 06:29:13.179366oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/253027Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2024-09-04T09:29:13Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Premises for eco-efficiency analysis on construction and demolition waste recycling |
title |
Premises for eco-efficiency analysis on construction and demolition waste recycling |
spellingShingle |
Premises for eco-efficiency analysis on construction and demolition waste recycling Waskow, Régis Pereira Reaproveitamento de resíduos Resíduos da construção civil Ecoeficiência Eco-efficiency Construction waste Demolition waste LCA LCC Sustainability |
title_short |
Premises for eco-efficiency analysis on construction and demolition waste recycling |
title_full |
Premises for eco-efficiency analysis on construction and demolition waste recycling |
title_fullStr |
Premises for eco-efficiency analysis on construction and demolition waste recycling |
title_full_unstemmed |
Premises for eco-efficiency analysis on construction and demolition waste recycling |
title_sort |
Premises for eco-efficiency analysis on construction and demolition waste recycling |
author |
Waskow, Régis Pereira |
author_facet |
Waskow, Régis Pereira Kanno, Rodrigo Tubino, Rejane Maria Candiota |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kanno, Rodrigo Tubino, Rejane Maria Candiota |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Waskow, Régis Pereira Kanno, Rodrigo Tubino, Rejane Maria Candiota |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Reaproveitamento de resíduos Resíduos da construção civil Ecoeficiência |
topic |
Reaproveitamento de resíduos Resíduos da construção civil Ecoeficiência Eco-efficiency Construction waste Demolition waste LCA LCC Sustainability |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Eco-efficiency Construction waste Demolition waste LCA LCC Sustainability |
description |
The construction industry is associated with significative impacts such a consumption of natural resources and waste generation. Eco-efficiency is an instrument for sustainable analysis which indicates the relation between environmental costs and impacts. While the most environmental method used is the lifecycle assessment (LCA), standardized by ISO 14040, the economic indicator should be selected according to the stakeholder. Total cost, Unit Cost, Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) are some of the economic indicators used in the economic analysis of Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) recycling, however, the search for literature regarding the Eco-efficiency analysis shows a tendency to use the total cost regardless of its objective. In this sense, the objective of this paper is to propose the main premises to be considered in the selection of the economic indicator and in the normalization of the analysis of the CDW recycling Eco-efficiency index results. The search method adopted was comprised for three steps: Systematic review of literature; Analysis and comparison of Eco-efficiency indicators (including economic and environmental inputs); Discussion about the main assumptions in the CDW recycling Eco-efficiency analysis. 14 articles were identified in the Science Direct and Springer platforms. This paper provides information to propose premises to the Eco-efficiency analysis on CDW recycling. As a result, was defined a standard Eco-efficiency analysis according the objective: assessment of the cost to minimizing impacts, a simple comparison between scenarios or economic and environmental viability. The first two objectives refer to the input data variation and the scenarios evaluated, respectively. The third objective needs to compare the results with the current scenario, the final disposal and established market material that recycled aggregate can replace. Using the simplified flowchart proposed for each CDW recycling Eco-efficiency analysis objective will allow to standardize studies of this aspect, thus enabling more credible, replicable and comparable development. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-21T04:53:06Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2022 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/253027 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
0718-378X |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001154358 |
identifier_str_mv |
0718-378X 001154358 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/253027 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Revista AIDIS de ingeniería y ciencias ambientales [recurso eletrônico]. Coyoacán, México. Vol. 14, n. 2 (ago. 2021), p. 564-577 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/253027/2/001154358.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/253027/1/001154358.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
82d11192b927d639dfb04411770f1dc8 fdd4573edfc94a6f6654f36915fabbce |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447815210401792 |